Richer's Ghost
Bourbonite
ok I read through the thread, and 99% of people didn’t think he was a parise replacement in the first place. so this all seems to be a moot point
Utility monster doesn't have time for egalitarianist thread.
ok I read through the thread, and 99% of people didn’t think he was a parise replacement in the first place. so this all seems to be a moot point
Utility monster doesn't have time for egalitarianist thread.
Okay looking back... what the hell happened with Clarkson in those last 30 or so games?
Okay looking back... what the hell happened with Clarkson in those last 30 or so games?
Okay looking back... what the hell happened with Clarkson in those last 30 or so games?
Okay looking back... what the hell happened with Clarkson in those last 30 or so games?
Clarkson I think had the lowest amount of points in the last 34 games though among non goon forwards. I believe he was tied with Gionta.
I think the one trick Poni had one less point than both of them in that time span, but he actually missed a couple games due to injury.
The New Jersey Devils put more shots on goal (per 20 minutes) with Clarkson on the ice than any other skater at even strength. Second was Loktionov, and third was Elias. This is per unit of ice time, so games played or time missed isn't a huge factor. Clarkson also led the team in corsi/20 minutes. He's become a very good hockey player considering his background.
If he isn't putting it in the back of the net then he's not worth what he's likely gonna get. Good corsi don't make you worth $5 million a year if you're scoring less than 20 goals.
I don't see him as a 30 goal guy. Maybe a perennial 20 guy.
So many of his shots were just thrown on net for the sake of shooting and led to zero rebound or chance. How did everyone not see that? He'd rack up tons of shots with literally not getting a single chance. He would also not pass it and elect to shoot when a pass was clearly the better choice. He wasn't playing the game that he has played his whole career, how has everyone not seen this? I'm not some hockey genius, but was it not painfully obvious that he wasn't playing his hard nosed game and was attempting to play like a high skill panzi?The point is that NO ONE was putting the puck in the back of the net and yet Clarkson was the best at doing what is necessary to score. Those aren't just Clarkson's shots, they're the shots (specifically shots on goal, too) that any Devil takes when Clarkson is on the ice. Basically, Clarkson's play facilitates zone time and shots on goal, which, historically, are both good indicators of goals being scored and games being won.