GDT: Panthers @ Leafs - 7pm Tuesday TSN

Status
Not open for further replies.

PromisedLand

I need more FOOD
Dec 3, 2016
45,130
61,125
Hogwarts
1701111598669.png


 
  • Like
Reactions: Cleetus

mikeyz

Registered User
Dec 3, 2013
7,732
7,059
The Panthers are complete frauds there isn't an excuse to lose to them especially with them on a back to back. They already lost once this season to them, and I was hoping the Leafs would have found their game by now to give me confidence they would win.

The good news is they have Ekblad back who is a liability defensively. That is a difference from last game. Also likely to avoid Bob who stops looking like an AHL goalie when he plays the Leafs for some reason.

I think the Leafs have in the past not started finding their game until they felt the pressure to do so from the market. I think we are getting there, I am expecting a pretty strong game by our guys. Start Woll, maybe knock Bennett's head against the boards a few times, should be an easy win.
You mean “starts” not “stops” right?
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,985
60,050
Guess AM34 doesn't like it when JT's wingers outperform his.

Sheldon still thinks the answer lies in some magical set of line combinations. :shakehead

I never understood why they didn’t just mix and match the Big 4 depending on the opposition, have multiple separate game plans to keep teams pro scouting a little off balance. If they’re planning for Matthews and Marner, give them a little Matthews and Nylander. Or slip in a Marner and Nylander shift. Or go Marner Nylander and Tavares and sneak Matthews onto another mismatch. You know, coaching.

The same coaching staff that will give you a Sandin Rielly D pairing just to check it out but won’t try different looks with their biggest stars.
 

Guided by Veseys

Registered User
Nov 14, 2011
3,837
3,170
Kind of wished they gave Marner a third line spot for a game or two just to see if he can crush the match up. I suppose in this market though it would be a colossal story if he went to third line to get it going for a bit. I’d love to have three potent offensive lines.
 

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,714
25,145
Richmond Hill, ON
Jeez Louize Keefer! Don’t hurt yourself with these wild adjustments that we’ve been screaming for since last season? These mental gymnastics may be exhausting for you…..

@PromisedLand : how dare you post such gratuitous violence here with no Warning? Now all the Jennifer Boterill shrinking violets of the Leafs Forum may go cross eyed and the risk of trauma is real. We are hockey players, dammit! We aren’t built for this kind of violence…..

:)
Panthers played a heavy game the last time I saw them play. Ekblad, Bennett, and Montour were all back. I'm hoping they bring it and the Leafs push back. I'm tired of watching the ice capades and want to see us show some emotion like they actually care about beating the team that embarrassed them in round #2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafSteel

LeafalCrusader

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
10,438
12,630
Winnipeg
Kind of wished they gave Marner a third line spot for a game or two just to see if he can crush the match up. I suppose in this market though it would be a colossal story if he went to third line to get it going for a bit. I’d love to have three potent offensive lines.

Yeah I would have left Bertuzzi Tavares Nylander alone and put Jarnkrok with Matthews and Knies and Marner with Robertson and Domi. Try to get three lines going as you said.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
20,154
30,947
Guess AM34 doesn't like it when JT's wingers outperform his.

Sheldon still thinks the answer lies in some magical set of line combinations. :shakehead

I have read too many comments to count the last few weeks of Keefe refusing to break up AM and MM. He does it, and I read this comment. The man literally cannot win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,220
13,136
GTA
I never understood why they didn’t just mix and match the Big 4 depending on the opposition, have multiple separate game plans to keep teams pro scouting a little off balance. If they’re planning for Matthews and Marner, give them a little Matthews and Nylander. Or slip in a Marner and Nylander shift. Or go Marner Nylander and Tavares and sneak Matthews onto another mismatch. You know, coaching.

The same coaching staff that will give you a Sandin Rielly D pairing just to check it out but won’t try different looks with their biggest stars.
Can't honestly say he hasn't tried many different combinations, but what seems to missing is the multiple separate game plans.
 

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,220
13,136
GTA
I have read too many comments to count the last few weeks of Keefe refusing to break up AM and MM. He does it, and I read this comment. The man literally cannot win.
Lots of posters also believe that there is some secret line combination that will resolve all of the clubs issues. I am not one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rojac and Optimist

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
12,323
17,363
Guess AM34 doesn't like it when JT's wingers outperform his.

Sheldon still thinks the answer lies in some magical set of line combinations. :shakehead

Knies and Matthews play fast straight line hockey when they’re at their best, Marner plays slow east west. Nylander plays fast straight line hockey when he’s at his best, Tavares and Bertuzzi play slow net front games.

I’m usually against the line blender as the go-to move to fix slumps but this has been an obvious change since day 1 if you want to get the most out of the top 6. Marner can simplify his passing since he just needs to get the puck somewhere within a few feet of the net and let the other two clean up a rebound instead of trying complicated Barcelona-meets-Globetrotters positional switch ups and the other 3 can play a fast straight line game where all 3 can shoot, clean up garbage, and play aggressive board retrievals if the rush chance doesn’t go.

Nylander also gives the top line a breakaway threat so it’s easier to play them best on best and have the other top line need to play cautious. There’s a trickle down effect if they’re used this way and we can give Tavares and Domi lines softer minutes as a result.
 

Leafs98

Registered User
Sep 26, 2007
540
369
If only the players would play as desperate as Keefe must feel. This is an important showing but one that could get the coach fired if they dont show up. I do think the leash has to be shortening at every losing streak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blanche Blanche

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,220
13,136
GTA
Knies and Matthews play fast straight line hockey when they’re at their best, Marner plays slow east west. Nylander plays fast straight line hockey when he’s at his best, Tavares and Bertuzzi play slow net front games.

I’m usually against the line blender as the go-to move to fix slumps but this has been an obvious change since day 1 if you want to get the most out of the top 6. Marner can simplify his passing since he just needs to get the puck somewhere within a few feet of the net and let the other two clean up a rebound instead of trying complicated Barcelona-meets-Globetrotters positional switch ups and the other 3 can play a fast straight line game where all 3 can shoot, clean up garbage, and play aggressive board retrievals if the rush chance doesn’t go.

Nylander also gives the top line a breakaway threat so it’s easier to play them best on best and have the other top line need to play cautious. There’s a trickle down effect if they’re used this way and we can give Tavares and Domi lines softer minutes as a result.
Let's hope so.

I don't disagree with the move, I just don't think it will address the real issues which is I believe are rooted in coaching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blanche Blanche

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
12,323
17,363
Let's hope so.

I don't disagree with the move, I just don't think it will address the real issues which is I believe are rooted in coaching.

Most moves are re-arranging the chairs on the titanic but occasionally you move Kessel away from Malkin to a 3rd line tailor fit to exploit matchups and it forces teams to play you completely differently which trickles down to everything from the other forward line matchups to changing the risk appetite for your D.

Hopefully it makes Keefe’s job easier when every line has a defined identity and job to do rather than going by feel of whoever’s on that game.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
20,154
30,947
Lots of posters also believe that there is some secret line combination that will resolve all of the clubs issues. I am not one of them.

Solve all the issues is unlikely. Improve the team is possible. Marner is a hell of a better player than he is playing and so is Matthews tbh. But Matthews has been good, just Marner is not good and killing tons of plays.

Get Marner going, spark the team with different combos, a confident Marner does a lot on both end of the ice for us. The other side of it is if Sammy gets hot (he is not as bad of a goalie as he has played. He had strong stretches for us) and Woll can find consistency, things will improve a lot as well.

The team has a lot of positives IMO. Easy to focus on the negatives but I have complete faith they will get hot here at some point and string together 15 wins in 20 games or something crazy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad