Account Terminated
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2009
- 32,629
- 0
The one thing that would hurt is that he is a huge supporter of Nathan Beaulieu.
Really? And what does Daigneault think of Nate?
No clue. I know Gallant is a supporter of Beaulieu though. Coached him in Saint-John and absolutely loved him there.
Really? And what does Daigneault think of Nate?
Maybe we can move Beaulieu to where Gallant gets a job for a premium. I'm just not seeing in him what a large portion of you do.
He just needs more time. That's all. I like how Bergevin has taken the Detroit approach, where you only bring in prospects once they are over-ripened rather than under-developed (this, of course, barring any superstar-level talent like a Galchenyuk).
I won't write off a kid that played a handful of playoff games at elite level talent and struggled. He was good against Boston, not so much against New York. Maybe this experience will be what he needed to push himself harder in the off-season.
The fact that N8thegr8 gives zero effort in Hamilton stinks of lack of character though. Game 6 vs the Rangers is how Beaulieu played in the AHL all year. I was shocked he got called up even once over Pateryn.
No clue. I know Gallant is a supporter of Beaulieu though. Coached him in Saint-John and absolutely loved him there.
The fact that N8thegr8 gives zero effort in Hamilton stinks of lack of character though. Game 6 vs the Rangers is how Beaulieu played in the AHL all year. I was shocked he got called up even once over Pateryn.
Hopefully for him that's not the guy running our PP, cause it's the worse I've seen in decades. The guys can't even enter the other teams' zone.[/
We have had the same issues on PP forever...
Inability to consistently win faceoffs inability to open up a lane to carry the zone inability to win a dump in overload. We haven't had that great puck handler since Kovalev who could back D off and gain the zone.
Maybe we can move Beaulieu to where Gallant gets a job for a premium. I'm just not seeing in him what a large portion of you do.
Maybe we can move Beaulieu to where Gallant gets a job for a premium. I'm just not seeing in him what a large portion of you do.
How do you view Beaulieu's skillset?
Maybe we can move Beaulieu to where Gallant gets a job for a premium. I'm just not seeing in him what a large portion of you do.
Hopefully for him that's not the guy running our PP, cause it's the worse I've seen in decades. The guys can't even enter the other teams' zone.
I can think of 2 seasons in the past 5 years where the PP was worse....
Relative to the personnel on hand? No, you can't.
No, I am not bringing relativity into this. That's a whole other can of worms that i don't intend getting into.
08/09 PP was frustrating but they were able to salvage it a bit. That one is debatable, I admit.
No debating 2011/2012 PP though.
At his best a 17-18 minute defenseman with first unit PP duties. Comparable to John-Michael Liles or less gritty Wisniewski.
I always felt that NHL coaches have a certain kind of a aura or look.
Gallant definitely got it.
Example, Kirk Muller embodied the perfect assistant coach and was never able to picture him as a head coach.. And he's back as assistant next year.
Boys at least spell his name right, it's Gerard Gallant. Not "Gerrad".