- Sep 21, 2005
- 19,261
- 1,221
Seriously ?
blaming the goalie for a 5 on 3 goal ?!?
I thought HF was for 'smart' hockey fans
blaming the goalie for a 5 on 3 goal ?!?
I thought HF was for 'smart' hockey fans
Considering the cesspool that exists on Twitter...yes, HF is indeed for smart hockey fans.Seriously ?
blaming the goalie for a 5 on 3 goal ?!?
I thought HF was for 'smart' hockey fans
Have my Canadian Thanksgiving tonight, good luck Sabres. There's no moving forward or building onto anything with another loss tonight. If they lose the NHL should just write an e-Buffalo Sabres in the standings because the odds of making the playoffs at 0-3 are already low but 0-4, has it ever been done?
I know, I meant the full season.This is Levi's second start. UPL has 2.
Kinda mean. Looked like we shoulda scored five minimum, at least they did the work for nearly 60 compared to PragueBaby steps guys, let try to score TWO goals today!
Cmon. Stop the panic. Edmonton started 2 and 9 last season. Stick the torches and pitchforks in the basement for a while. Leave the knooses at home and don’t watch or go if you aren’t satisfied w the effort against LA.
Hate how true this is
Unless my information is wrong (and it might be, I am too lazy to look it up myself) there has been exactly 1 team since the lockout that has made the playoffs after starting 0-4. The 08-09 Ducks made it in with 91 points. That team had prime Getzlaf and Perry, Selanne, Pronger, and Neidermayer plus a ton of other good players.I guarantee 0-4 has made the playoffs before. When the NHL was a 21 team league, 16 teams made the playoffs.
They didn't IR Peterka so they don't have a spare spot to use unless they waived Bryson or GilbertSurprised they didn't call someone up or have an extra forward