cwede
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2010
- 9,728
- 8,097
Rangers hired their shakeup yesterdayBoth teams could use a shakeup
...
no good reason not to give Sully a shot with the remarkable weapon that Bread can be
Rangers hired their shakeup yesterdayBoth teams could use a shakeup
...
Garbage? Lol. Panarin is one of the best players in hockey. Arguably the greatest free agent signing in NY sports in the past 100 yearsLA do not need old and expensive NY garbage (Panarin and Kreider).
Kings need new coach and new GM.
Garbage? Lol. Panarin is one of the best players in hockey. Arguably the greatest free agent signing in NY sports in the past 100 years
Great, you should keep him.Garbage? Lol. Panarin is one of the best players in hockey. Arguably the greatest free agent signing in NY sports in the past 100 years
Hell no. Kings should not be trading out good youth for an old guys.Panarin to Kings for Laferriere, and Greentree??
Nobody would look really good next to shadow of player Kopitar used to be.The only scenario in which I see Panarin traded to the Kings is if the Rangers need to clear cap space to sign Marner.
He would look really good next to Kopitar and Kempe. And if Kuzmenkovs demands are too rich that might be an avenue the Kings will explore, but they should never trade Kempe for him
I think he could. LA's biggest issue is they don't have a superstar anymore. Byfield should break out at some point but is probably never a threat for 90+ points. Kings need someone who can turn the tides offensively, Ottawa was the only other team to make the playoffs without a ppg+ player, and at least they were close with Stutzle getting 79.I don't see Panarin pushing them over the hump when it comes to playoffs. Kempe hasn't been the problem in the playoffs and Panarin hasn't been impressive lately in the playoffs. This doesn't make sense since they both have 1 year on their cap, and Panarin cost more. The cap hit for Kempe is beautiful and even if he doesn't extend, there's no difference in losing him for nothing or losing Panarin for nothing. They should just keep what they have.
No, Panarin would have the same offensive numbers playing on a defensive team like the Kings. Kempe is a much better fit fir the Kings.I think he could. LA's biggest issue is they don't have a superstar anymore. Byfield should break out at some point but is probably never a threat for 90+ points. Kings need someone who can turn the tides offensively, Ottawa was the only other team to make the playoffs without a ppg+ player, and at least they were close with Stutzle getting 79.
Kempe has nothing to do with what I said.No, Panarin would have the same offensive numbers playing on a defensive team like the Kings. Kempe is a much better fit fir the Kings.
The Kings play an Uber defensive system and it’s clear the system holds back the offense. Not many players would be a PPG guy in LA system. In LA if you make mistakes defensively trying to make offense you will pay for it with ice time. Not saying that’s the right outlook these days but that’s how the LA brass runs things.Kempe has nothing to do with what I said.
I'm pretty sure a line of Panarin, Byfield and one of Kempe or Fiala would result in some high scoring. LA changed coaches just last year, you can't make the argument that the system is holding back their offense.
I wouldn't exactly agree with that. It's a personnel over system issue.The Kings play an Uber defensive system and it’s clear the system holds back the offense. Not many players would be a PPG guy in LA system. In LA if you make mistakes defensively trying to make offense you will pay for it with ice time. Not saying that’s the right outlook these days but that’s how the LA brass runs things.
Kempe for free if NYR takes Blake & Luc!
I called in my marker with LA and we got Blake ousted. Working on Luc now. Be ready to drive Kempe to the airportKempe for free if NYR takes Blake & Luc!