Quantity vs quality argument? Yeesh.
There's no player on this team I "want" to go away. Whatever improves the team, do it.
You'd have a hard time arguing that Dion is superior to a 3.5-4 mil dman. Would you not want 2 of those which gives us more depth vs 1 dman @ 7 that plays like 3.4-4?
I would
We have to give him another year though. It seriously couldn't get any worse
And I'll bookmark this post :p
I hope I'm not "proven wrong" because that would mean Nonis is forcing Clarkson on the 2nd line and bringing the entire team down to try and make himself look less of a fool and in the process proving he's the biggest fool of all.
You'd have a hard time arguing that Dion is superior to a 3.5-4 mil dman. Would you not want 2 of those which gives us more depth vs 1 dman @ 7 that plays like 3.4-4?
Dion is a #3 or #4 defenseman...What's the going rate for a second pairing d-man these days,4M?
You'd have a hard time arguing that Dion is superior to a 3.5-4 mil dman. Would you not want 2 of those which gives us more depth vs 1 dman @ 7 that plays like 3.4-4?
All the Habs fans
Dion, not because I hate him or his contract, I'm just so sick of his existence being a focal point of discussion. It's not Dion's lack of leadership, it's the exaggerated whining about him that has become a distraction. Also genuinely curious to see what trade value he has.
Franson, he's god awful.
Clarkson? If possible but I'll boldly predict he has a 20/20 season (I know whomever is reading this is disagreeing with right now, I know his career statistics, you need not point what I already know). I'm fine with giving him another season before writing him off.
Bozak, he's just a ban aid on the top line, there is a narrow window to get value for him as he'll come back to earth this season, he's shoot percentage was ridiculously high indicating this year was a fluke.
Dion Phaneuf is what my heart says. My brain says David Clarkson.