I agree, if Subban is asking for something like MaxPack (~4.5 / 7 years) and Bergevin is not going for this I think that's bad management. I would have no problem with that. However, I suspect that PK is asking much more and that's the core issue. But I don't really know.
You know what's bad management, letting your star player on the sideline because he wants to commit longer years here.
I mean, Doughty held out for more cash. So did Radulov, Yashin, etc. Players will get into contractual disputes over cash. This is the first time I see management refuse to commit more years into a young star. Usually, that's exactly what they want.
It's freaking Pejorative Slured. People talk about the risk, what risk? You think PK will decline? Based on what? Because in some cases it has happened? So what? Odds are that won't happen. Matter of fact, I'd bet all my possessions and life earnings on PK not declining.
Just to be clear, one bad season can happen, that's not a decline.
So really, what's the worst thing that can happen?? He stays the way he is?? Okay, so he'll be one of the many other players on our team that's a big overpaid. He'll be just like them all.
The upside?? We get him at a cheaper price, and he keeps improving to the point where he's considered one of the best Dman in the NHL.
Arguing he needs a 2y deal based on risk is absolutely ridiculous. Also, it doesn't appear management feels that it is about risk. It looks like to them it's more about instilling a salary structure and making everyone go through it. Because MB is a rookie, he is holding strongly to his position simply because he needs to make his mark. He's as sure a bet as anybody else. What's really Pejorative Slured though, is keeping our best player out because he wants to commit longer here.
If Scott Gomes was worth 7.25 million, Subban is worth 15 million...I don't like the logic you are using.
You need to compare players that have similar styles/roles and experience. MDZ, Edler, Letang are more similar to PK for example. Compare PK to young offensive minded defensemen. Now you can bring up Kaberle at 4.5 million but the guy is a veteran, has had 13 or so 30+point seasons, a career best 67 points and similar PPG last year with the Habs. And many of us think he's overpaid.
The other difference is that PK's salary is likely to go up in his next contract, he just has to work for it a little bit longer. Gorges' will not, he is what he is.
Scott Gomez was given that contract years ago, in NYC. Gorges got it last season, in Mtl. Granted, it was by another administration. Still, it's a bran new deal, and making 100K more while doing much more is ridiculous.
But, push Gorges aside if you want. Bergevin gave a big deal to Price. 6.5M is a lot of cash to Carey, and I don't think he deserves it all. Just so you know, that's the 3rd highest cap hit for goalies in the NHL. Price hasn't played like a top 3 goalie once in his career. Not once. Meanwhile, you have PK here that is, without a doubt, a top 30 Dman in the NHL.
Look at the list of the highest cap hits in the NHL, in the top 25, you have guys like Wiz, Byf, Carle, Wideman, Visnovsky, Phaneuf, Jaybo, Campbell, Seabrook.
If you look at ice time, PK was 14th overall. Average time on ice 18th.
In his rookie year, half way through, he replaced Hammer as our #1 shutdown guy, with both Markov and Gorges out. Since then, he's been our go-to guy.
At his age, you know he is still progressing, which is great. So, it's not the end of the world if you pay him like a top 20 Dman in the NHL. It is certainly not worth making him sit at home over it.
I strongly doubt PK is asking for more than 6M at the most. Negotiate this down to 5.25 if possible. But even at 6, I wouldn't cry over it.
Like I said though, keeping your best player at home because he wants to commit more years now is just dumb. You take advantage of that.