Out of Town Thread Part XXV

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

ECWHSWI

TOUGHEN UP.
Oct 27, 2006
28,604
5,423
Do you want me to show you all the teams that had stars that didn't win?

Yes you need great players. We need kk to turn into a bergeron or kopitar type player. We need an elite d, we need elite goaltending.

We don't necessarily need 100 point players.
what for exactly, what point would it proves ???

dunno why you're stuck on the 100 pts. it's not the 80's anymore.
 

ECWHSWI

TOUGHEN UP.
Oct 27, 2006
28,604
5,423
Because the post I initially responded to referenced 100 points.....
excet your post (the one I replied to at least) was talking about superstars, not about the number of points this or that player would get.

look, if you think one needs to get 100 pts to be a superstar, you go ahead, Just so you know, in the last decades there's been years without a single superstar, and some others with only one or two.
 

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,226
22,641
Edmonton
excet your post (the one I replied to at least) was talking about superstars, not about the number of points this or that player would get.

look, if you think one needs to get 100 pts to be a superstar, you go ahead, Just so you know, in the last decades there's been years without a single superstar, and some others with only one or two.
We agree, just so you know. Does a 105 point Draisatl help your team more in the playoffs than a 72 point Kopitar? Does Mitch Marner help your team win in the playoffs more than Logan Couture (career high 70pts)

ALL I'm saying is that you dont' need sexy point totals from your top players to have a contending team. NOW AGAIN, I'm not trying to make a case for our current Habs. We are missing 2-3 elite players at key positions.

But just because we probably won't be in a position to draft a Nate Mackinnon, doesn't mean that a winner can't be built here.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
30,861
17,990
Dundas
Superstars are fun to watch but I'll take a winning team anyday.

1993 Muller was 28th overall in scoring, lebeau was around 50th

Again, not comparing teams but elite offensive totals are not a prerequisite for a winning team - depth at all positions is
Nobody says it was a prerequisite.
 
Last edited:

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,226
22,641
Edmonton
Nobody says it was a prerequisite. Many teams have won without one.

Does not mean its exactly smart to go 35 years and counting without one.

I would rather have a winning team than a team with superstars.

But its not against the rules to have both. Sometimes it appears some Habs forget that.
I would love to have both.

I would love to have one of the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaulD

ECWHSWI

TOUGHEN UP.
Oct 27, 2006
28,604
5,423
We agree, just so you know. Does a 105 point Draisatl help your team more in the playoffs than a 72 point Kopitar? Does Mitch Marner help your team win in the playoffs more than Logan Couture (career high 70pts)

ALL I'm saying is that you dont' need sexy point totals from your top players to have a contending team. NOW AGAIN, I'm not trying to make a case for our current Habs. We are missing 2-3 elite players at key positions.

But just because we probably won't be in a position to draft a Nate Mackinnon, doesn't mean that a winner can't be built here.
thats what elite players do, put up points. lots of them.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
84,666
153,643


Damn. Can the Sens catch a break with all this off-ice drama?


Oh, wow. Melnyk is the new Harold Ballard. Bets money at a casino to try and win a jackpot in the hopes of presenting an OS? That club needs to be put under trusteeship.

If this really happened, there is probably a lot more we don’t know about.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DAChampion

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
25,749
19,705
Quebec City, Canada
Oh, wow. Melnyk is the new Harold Ballard. Bets money at a casino to try and win a jackpot in the hopes of presenting an OS? That club needs to be put under trusteeship.

If this really happened, there is probably a lot more we don’t know about.

I would usually say not way it happened it's a made up story but it's Melkyk we are talking about so it's probably true.
 

Scintillating10

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
20,982
10,149
Nova Scotia
Lebrun said other day Point contract talks at an impasse. If so, helps us. HOpefully he misses the season. Staying healthy, having everybody signed and having a happy dressing room gives an advantage in this league of parity
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad