His weird reffing seems to align with Bettman’s priorities of advantaging US teams with small fanbases. It certainly doesn’t lead to watchable hockey.
I remember doing a compilation about 15 years ago that spanned between 95 and 2010, where I calculated and ranked teams each year and the overall totals for times shorthanded versus powerplays given. For that period, all O6 teams were (total) bottom 10 in PP/SH differential, while NJ, PIT, TB and Car had hugely been favored. The former (NJ) all throughout the period led all teams, while TB, Car and Ana were massively favored the year they won the cup or went to the finals (for Ana). Something around +80 for those seasons, meaning they had one full PP per game more than they were shorthanded, which is massive.
Surprisingly enough, Habs were massively favored for one season only, in the Vigneault years, i think it was 2000-2001, iirc. Around +80, but as soon as Habs became more competitive, they were mostly always bottom 10.
The overall outlook is that O6 teams were oddly all very low, while teams in financial dire straits (NJ, Pitts) and certain expansion teams were massively favored.
As an aside, strangely, Pitts also won the biggest draft lottery of the last quarter century and NJ had advanced the most times by lottery win since the inception of the draft lottery.
Teams in financial trouble seem to become very lucky in this league.