Team_Spirit
95% Elliotte
- Jul 3, 2002
- 39,874
- 22,271
How did the Habs beat the Jackets twice! They would sit in wc1 rn.
Lankinen sets a new record.
Lankinen sets a new record.
Then it would have to be because he told them he wouldn't report to them and would complete the 3 year deal in Russia. But wasn't he 5 or lower in the final draft rankings.I don't know about that. It seemed to me that reports were saying he's the 2nd most talented player in the draft, and some even put him at the top of the list in that category.
So the talent part was likely not the reason for his drop.
Says you? Because 4 other teams clearly valued needs over talent?Not the point. When it was the time to pick, they went for talent. And going for Names instead of Kuch was not about position. It was about evaluation of talent. We went needs. And not only D...but right D. Made no sense then, makes no sense now. Will never make sense.
Then it would have to be because he told them he wouldn't report to them and would complete the 3 year deal in Russia. But wasn't he 5 or lower in the final draft rankings.
Not says me. Says Hughes who said that if Reinbacher would have been a lefty D, they might have cooled off on them.Says you? Because 4 other teams clearly valued needs over talent?
Maybe the concept of best player available is in the eye of the beholder unless it’s a clear cut Crosby, Ovy, McDavid?
Afterall Preds proposed a deal to try to pry the Habs 5OA pick for …. reportedly Redenbacher not Michkov.
Seriously? Well I guess you didn't read everything that was read about him for 2 years before draft day....No. Many did not think Michkoiv was a special talent. And even if he is it mean NOTHING.. Because if he is then teams passed on him because he wouldn't sign with them . So there is no way he was going to be a Hab.
For me, as serviceable as Reinbacher could end up being, if Michkov ends up a Kucherov lite. Reinbacher will need to be a complete 2-way d-man. With some offensive punch. Might happen....but there's not a lot of gap for errors.Okay. I wanted Michkov too.
But can we wait to see what RB does before declaring that this was a mistake? I think that’s reasonable.
Btw, I’ll have zero issues criticizing mgmt if it doesn’t work out. Michkov looked awesome and we passed. Why? Not sure: I suspect they felt they could get forward talent in the next draft and there was talk of him not really wanting to come here. Either way though he looks like he’ll be a beast. Very good chances we missed an awesome player.
But before I declare it a mistake I’d at least like to see what our own pick looks like.
Okay, well let’s wait and see before we write this off as a disaster.For me, as serviceable as Reinbacher could end up being, if Michkov ends up a Kucherov lite. Reinbacher will need to be a complete 2-way d-man. With some offensive punch. Might happen....but there's not a lot of gap for errors.
He just keeps producing, which is exactly what this team has lacked for decades. Time will tell if they made the right decision, but it's not looking good early on.
Yeah, it’s honestly not about Michkov or Reinbacher but rather I don’t want this mistake and this oversight to happen again. Even if Michkov didn’t want to come, I want the guy who failed to seduce him to be fired.Fire the guy who is more determined for us to NOT pick Michkov. Not recognizing that kind of talent is criminal.