PlayMakers
Registered User
You said that some of the best resources I could consume for news are to actually watch the games yourself, to watch the press conferences yourself, to consult the original contract yourself... Sorry but that is bypassing the journalist. That is exactly what I do because I don't trust the impartiality of journalists.I "literally" did not say that, but that's what you heard because of the way you feel. I'm trying to urge you to move past that and evaluate your information outlets. For example, how about my 4th point? That doesn't bypass journalists at all. And if you take all the other suggestions, and you evaluate those known facts against what your information source is telling you, that can go into building the trust you are complaining about.
Let's take Dom, a popular poster on this Bruins board. Do you find that his information lines up, factually? Are you able to separate his opinion from the facts of his presentations? Do you find that you can cross-reference what he's informing you with other sources? Is he presenting primary sources?
There are ways to build trust and identify valid resources. Just grousing grimly, nodding with your friends that journalism is untrustworthy cheats you and the listener out of the actual work I'm telling you is required as a consumer of media.
Frankly, I find the whole attempt to educate me on this condescending. I'm not sure why you assumed I don't do those things, but that's how I came to the conclusion that you need to verify journalists in the first place. I would hear two wildly different accounts of the same event, depending on the channel I was watching, or the newspaper I was reading. So I started looking for the source material, Reuters or AP, the orginal interviews, first hand accounts, bystander video... I'd listen to multiple sources reporting on the event both in the US and sources outside the US and compare accounts. I know you're suggesting that doing these things will lead to finding journalists that are trustworthy, but in my experience, doing it has led me to believe that the only way to get to the unvarnished truth is to do your own research.
Fwiw, I used to hold journalists in high regard, as having a sort of calling. They had a code of 7 core ethics that they believed in; truth and accuracy, impartiality and fairness, transparency, integrity... Now we have Fox News. We have newspapers, TV stations and news outlets getting consolidated by corporations and billionaires so they can distort the truth to whatever version benefits them (left or right) the most. And the resulting lack of journalistic integrity is the reason trust in the media is at an all time low.
OT: At this point, I'm getting dangerously close to political talk so if you'd like to continue the conversation PM me.



