The Devilish Buffoon
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2018
- 12,705
- 11,497
Interested in bringing Boro Cop back home? Nashville is carrying 8 D and he's never quite fit in
Boro for Mete?
Interested in bringing Boro Cop back home? Nashville is carrying 8 D and he's never quite fit in
Scott Harrington
Reunanen + Hajek
Chiarot
Soucy
Zadorov
Juuso Riikola
John Moore
Ollie Matta
Nathan Beaulieu
Simek
Manson/Shatetnkirk
Boro Cop
No, we are sending a prospect and Zadorov for Brown. You can't have him.Marcus Pettersson for Connor Brown.
Would have really loved Adam Larsson on the Senators. I wish we were more aggressive in the pursuit of him in free agency.
A RHS forward like Connor Brown is really what we need. I like Ritchie on the 4th line, but he's playing 2nd line now because we have no RHS wingers in the top 9. I'd add pick or prospect to balance value.Zadorov makes just under 4 mil on a 1 year deal and has been serviceable before. Doubt Calgary is looking for much
No, you'll take Zadorov and a pick/prospect for C. Brown and you'll like it.I wonder if Lyubushkin is available? RD, expiring contract and is big so DJ will actually play him.
Other targets:
1. Nick Jensen: I know he was kind of on the block earlier. Is a bit too expensive for Washington for their cap situation on a quick glance. Will suck taking on the second year for a bottom pairing guy but ottawa's defense is that bad.
2. f***ing rights Demelo...please
3. Soucy: he shouldnt be available right
After those guys it would have to be a guy that is not expected to be on the block otherwise it seems like a marginal upgrade to the crap that ottawa is running now
No, you'll take Zadorov and a pick/prospect for C. Brown and you'll like it.
No it's not. But you'll still take it and say thank you afterwards.Is the pick a first?
Yes that's why you'll be dealing him to us. How can you get a top 3 pick with him in the lineup?Sens aren't dealing Connor Brown. He's a big piece of the forward group and our most veteran defensive presence up front in the lineup.
Josh Brown for Zadorov is a deal, and you don't even have to add a pick.No, we are sending a prospect and Zadorov for Brown. You can't have him.
I mean I'd do it, but if you're giving out Browns I'd prefer the pair.Josh Brown for Zadorov is a deal.
No take backs.
No Browns (plural) unless Nikita has a twin that I'm unaware of (and he is included).I mean I'd do it, but if you're giving out Browns I'd prefer the pair.
Curious what you would think of acquiring Matthew Tkachuk?Josh Brown for Zadorov is a deal, and you don't even have to add a pick.
No take backs.
I'd do it, but the lotto ticket would have to be Jarventie if the good Brown is included.Curious what you would think of acquiring Matthew Tkachuk?
I'd want the good Brown, a protected 1st in 22 or 23, 2nd in the year the 1st isn't and a lotto ticket prospect like Sokolov or Crookshank.
Because having 45M in LWs probably doesn't make sense going forward. Mangiapane is going to land between 6 and 7. Gaudreau between 8 and 9, Lucic is at 6, Dube 2.5, Coleman 4.9.I'd do it, but the lotto ticket would have to be Jarventie if the good Brown is included.
The question I wanna know is, why would you do that?
Fair enough.Because having 45M in LWs probably doesn't make sense going forward. Mangiapane is going to land between 6 and 7. Gaudreau between 8 and 9, Lucic is at 6, Dube 2.5, Coleman 4.9.
I'd want a lotto ticket prospect though, not a used kleenex prospect (and a LHS LW used kleenex at that).