ScoutLife4
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2023
- 821
- 980
Do you think you would be better without Pinelli's 17 goals?I don’t think that’s true. Peterborough is still…well….Peterborough. If NB sells Romani as expected, they are what they are now without him. I still feel Ottawa makes the playoffs. Additionally, if they do let MacK go, that opens the door to playing both Gerrior and Stonehouse. Although neither are a Pinelli replacement, it does help lessen the blow having both in the lineup. Gerrior is the likely candidate to go if they keep MacK. He has 9 goals to date. Stonehouse is probably good for 25 prorated over a full season. I think the Pinelli loss would be impactful no doubt but you could say that about Musty, Barlow, Romani etc…
Additionally, depending on the type of deal for Pinelli, there may be an asset that comes back that can help as well.
The team is relatively ok for the most part. Moving Pinelli won’t be as big a factor as you suggest. At the end of the day, it is just one player. With him or without him they will struggle against the top half of the league regardless. Even if I am wrong and they drop out of the playoffs, that just shows exactly how far off they are from being a decent team.
The 67’s have spent assets each of the last two seasons. Doing it again would be near impossible to come back from. They have some really good young players that are showing a lot of promise. IF they can add some assets with both Pinelli this year and Mews next year, it woudl go a long way towards surrounding those young players with support.
Keeping Pinelli and running out the string status quo doesn’t do anything positive.
Trying to understand the logic here.