Ottawa 67s 2024-25 Season Thread, Part I

OMG67

Registered User
Sep 1, 2013
11,895
7,722
Oh absolutely would be nice to access that but they’re not going to go out and spend a bunch of money at every rink just so fans can get an extra look or two at reviews. I’m sure the OHL had an angle of it or they wouldn’t have called it no goal
It is the Rogers feed. It is rare there are other cameras, other than the league mandated one above the nets, that are League feeds not accessed by the TV crew. That is the first one that there was ‘apparently” another angle that was used to overturn the call. We are ASSUMING there was another angle because the angles they had were clearly not conclusive. It is VERY possible the angles we had were the angles they had. Who knows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hinterland

frontsfan67

Registered User
Dec 3, 2022
3,004
1,722
It is the Rogers feed. It is rare there are other cameras, other than the league mandated one above the nets, that are League feeds not accessed by the TV crew. That is the first one that there was ‘apparently” another angle that was used to overturn the call. We are ASSUMING there was another angle because the angles they had were clearly not conclusive. It is VERY possible the angles we had were the angles they had. Who knows?
Maybe. Who knows. His stick was well above the crossbar though. Maybe he tipped it when it was above it. It was a lengthy review so they wanted to get it right I’m sure
 

Hinterland

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2016
12,520
6,229
Oh absolutely would be nice to access that but they’re not going to go out and spend a bunch of money at every rink just so fans can get an extra look or two at reviews. I’m sure the OHL had an angle of it or they wouldn’t have called it no goal
They didn't. Otherwise they'd have told the refs. The refs made that call after watching it on their mini tablet. Given the fact that they needed conclusive evidence to overturn this I'm calling bs here. Sure looked like a scam. Based on the TV feed I don't see how this could be a conclusive no goal.
 

Hinterland

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2016
12,520
6,229
Maybe. Who knows. His stick was well above the crossbar though. Maybe he tipped it when it was above it. It was a lengthy review so they wanted to get it right I’m sure
That was when the puck was already in the net. He took a swing at it but based on the TV feed it was pretty clear.
 

OMG67

Registered User
Sep 1, 2013
11,895
7,722
when its loaded into instat or sports contract i will see if i can check it out in slow motion and post it to see if it shows anything definitive.

My assumption is there is an ice level camera in the corner. Ottawa broadcasts like having that camera angle. This was at SBP and not TD Centre so I am not sure if that camera was set up for this game. TD Place is set up better because there is the concourse around the glass. SBP has the seating around the glass so I am unsure what sort of camera angle they had set up today down low.

I’d be curious to see Amidovski’s ice time today. I missed the 2nd period and the last five or so minutes of the 1st because of work. I’m pretty sure he got a regular shift in the 1st and much of the 3rd today. I know he had a shift in the 3rd where he was very effective.
 

beastintheeast

Registered User
Mar 27, 2013
3,581
727
My sense is that certain players chafe under DC's system/coaching style, but overall IMO he is a very good coach and generally has his teams well-prepared to play hard and play to their strengths. I'd say where he falls a little short is having his players consistently play disciplined hockey (he doesn't do a good job at reining-in the after the whistle stuff which is coachable imo), nor does he seem to adapt quickly when things move against his teams. We've seen that in recent playoffs.

He is a good coach for the national junior teams because generally speaking those teams are loaded with talent and experience and he just needs to steer the ship in the right direction. Not sure if he's going to be as successful coaching younger teams in the midst of a re-build/re-tool.
DC could not develop young talent if it slapped him on the face. I am not surprised that Amidovski's parents and agent screaming. What surprised me is that Whitehead's weren't that we know of.

Remember that first round draft picks think that they have a shot at the NHL. Most of them are playing for that. Then they come here and get told that they are going to be an important part of the rebuild of this team and even when the teamhas major injurines like they did int ehplayofffs he still sits them on the bench.

The fact that the team is short benched should mean that a rookie will get a ton of icetime that he would not normally get.

Any coach other DC would be doing that.

DC would rather play 2 lines for a full 60 minutes

Then you have a rted plaeyr like Ekberg who they draft and is in his draft year he was leading thelague for rookies and one of the top scorers onteh team and he get put ont he 4th line.

I have said it before and will repeat it even though some will disagree. IF DC stays and Boyd drafts midgets you are going to see players agents before the draft tell Boyd don't draft us we will not report.

Parents are going to steer away from talking to Ottawa scouts or boyd if they think he is lying to them.

If you trade Amidovski it will be interesting to see what they get. Let's face it if he stays home after xmas he has a lower value and will probably be picks becauwse no one will want to come here.
 

ScoutLife4

Registered User
Nov 28, 2023
782
924
Stonehouse stick was WAY above the crossbar before the puck goes into the net at the time its tipped as Mews follows through with his shot.
Problem is on the camera you can't see the puck because the camera frames are so slow in Ottawa.
Definitely looked like both Mews and Stonehouse knew right away it was a high stick.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad