beastintheeast
Registered User
- Mar 27, 2013
- 3,561
- 724
I think there are a lot of moving parts. It seems likely that Barlas will be moved. At least if you believe the rumours. If that happens, it opens the door for a 3-LW. If Pinelli moves at the deadline, then that is another LW spot opening up. Perfect. We have some young depth guys that could use extra ice.
I’m not a fan of cutting deep in trades. I am cool with dealing excess players that aren’t being used efficiently to give them a shot elsewhere and dish off a graduating player with high value so you can push assets into the future. To me, that is strong management of assets.
I think certain players have a higher value on your team than int he trade market. Gerrior is definitely one of those guys. I don’t think you’d get a 2nd round pick plus for him. You may as well keep him and throw him out there to win pucks for his linemates. If he plays with a younger player, that younger player will get the puck on his stick more because of Gerrior.
Gerrior seems more destined for CIS hockey I think. I don’t see him as a Pro. If he is scholastically inclined, I think 4 years of CIS hockey while getting an education is perfect for him.
I agree that Gerrior does not have a high trade value and can see him as an RW, which we are low on.
If players develop then I can see opening up the chance for him to play in another area at the deadline.
I lean toward Gardiner coming back healthy and making an impact so he is probably more likely to get the NHL contract but it is worth the gamble seeing if he returns. I doubt Foster gets an NHL deal. Dever is the most likely OA at this point. Maybe round them out with Horner? So, I wouldn’t move any of those four unless a deal is too sweet to pass up.
Gardiner will have to show that he can play two-way hockey at a level above the OHL or really good. Texas needs players who are not liabilities. That could be him, but again, he will have to up his game and show that he is a first line center.
Foster I agree will probably return but again you never know if he ups his game we are talking about Kyle Dumb ass and his affection for people form the Soo
So, we will have our top pick in the 2023 season, who is in his third year, and the best is playing third-line center. If that is the case can we officially say that Boyd screwed the proverbial pooch in that draft considering that his first round did not report and he definitely missed the boat in the second round If that is the case then we should have had him playing CCHL or OJHL to get ice time and hone his skillsSo, a 2025-26 roster would look like:
Foster(OA) - Ekberg - Korbler
Amidovski - Dever(OA) - Horner(OA)
Yanni - Whitehead - Kelly
Hilton - Perrier - X
Marrelli - Mews
Dietsch - Brady
Eshkawkogan
Nelson
That isn’t all that bad without factoring in changes and more draft picks etc. It would be nice to see Bonomo develop with his size on the back end and get Vandenberg signed.
The problem with Barlas has little to do with Barlas. He again spent a year with almost no ice time after getting drafted ahead of where he should have been.The problem with Barlas is he isn’t a centre. he was pushed into that role. He is a really good winger. He is head and shoulders ahead of Yanni on the wing. But, I agree. We have depth on the wings and if we can get a decent return for Barlas then we should do it, especially if it opens a spot ont he 3rd line for a younger player.
QUESTION ME THIS THOUGH
If no one will take Barlas Dever, Gardiner Foster or Kelly, what do you do? As Dirty said, there may not be a market for Barlas, just as he thinks there would not be a market for Gerrior this year.
Are we going to go through a season that does not allow any development for the young players?
We are going to see either Yanni, Whitehead and/or Amidovski look at the tea leaves and ask to go bye-bye.
The only reason for them to stay would be in the case of Amidovski and Whitehead the uni package
Last edited: