Ottawa 67's 2022-23 Season Thread

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would Boyd and Cameron
If they shift focus to next season, I think it would be a mistake. Barlas has not proven capable as an OHL player let alone a compelling 1st round pick that will help drive the offence. I think there is a chance that Barlas turns it around though but I think it is probably more likely in another organization. Moldenhauer didn’t report so that is back to back 1st round picks that have netted relatively nothing. You cannot typically compete with two first round picks in what would be their 18 and 19 year old season that are non-existent.

But, if they were to shift focus, it would mean they would have to trade Matier and Beck. There is no real way around it. The problem with that is they would then probably either miss the playoffs or be first round fodder...
2023 playoff - 0-4
2022 playoff - 0-4
2021 playoff - cancelled
2020 playoff - cancelled

We will go into next season with zero playoff games won over the previous four seasons. Not ideal if we are shifting focus to next year competing.

They have collected quite the draft pick cupboard, one of the most high picks collection in the entire league. You cannot keep using them to pick players. If you do, you end up in the situation they are in now where they have capable bodies and no spots for them. So, you flip a couple of those bodies for picks you flip to make improvements.

The best way to develop a consistently winning team is to strategically trade pieces that you can afford to trade when the time is right. The time is right for the 67’s to trade some assets for at least an OA and second player, maybe an Import. A centre and a puck moving D-Man. They have expendable pieces.

If they were to maintain status quo, this is the team they could return next season:

Pinelli -Rohrer - Stonehouse
TJ (OA) - Barlas - Dever
Gerrior - Gardiner - Kelly
Foster - Quick

Mayich - Mews
Sirman - GillShane (OA)
Marrelli - Ewles
Smyth (OA)

Donoso (OA)
McKenzie

***Dever, Quick and Ewles probably don’t play as 67’s this season and come in next year quite green.

I’m not too sure but I don’t see much of a threat there with Beck, Boucher and Matier gone. I’d suggest there are more spots to fill next year than this year.

That is just signed players. That doesn’t include another Import pick from 2023, as well as a full compliment of draft picks in 2023 that includes a first and a couple more seconds etc. So you have at least four more players coming in next season that would be expected to insert into the lineup. They have one winger spot?

They have expendable pieces they can use now to turn into picks to add to their cupboard. Then use some picks to bolster this roster. So when all is said and done, how does next years roster look compared to the one above? Delete Barlas, Sirman and one of Dever or Ewles. It is not all that different. Incoming players will fill the gaps. They probably have a small reset year because of the Moldenhauer/Barlas back to back whiffs on first round picks. They deal Rohrer and gain some assets Back and then focus on 2024-25.
Clearly you've thought this through. You make a lot of sense. It makes sense to acquire the OA centreman and a puck moving dman. And perhaps I have underestimated the capability of this team with the additions of two OA's and another depth forward. Is there any chance Boucher sticks in the AHL? I hear the Ottawa Senators are going young in the A and it makes me wonder whether the Sens have him competing for a roster spot there. Thoughts??
 
Well then for your sake I hope you are wrong. If they run the ice like they did with Butler, you will compete about once every ten season with a two year stretch and then fall into a toilet swirling down a drain for 6 of the other 8 seasons.
If it’s for my sake, the wolves will build a team that the F, D, G are similar ages and truly contend.
You are making assertions based on a pre-conceived opinion rather than what you have observed. The battalion was a contender for the first two years in NB and 3rd in conference the season after before needing a rebuild. The year before moving to NB, the battalion finished T-2nd in conference?
The (Brampton) battalion could never really make big additions for a run because 1300 fans does not afford a team to be truly bad and miss the playoffs.

NB was good last year and will be this, and seem set up well for a few years without a major rebuild.
Extra picks for 4-5 years can set up team for a while. It worked for the otters, ‘67s, hounds, firebirds. Barrie and OS are now pretty loaded as well.
 
Last edited:
Why would Boyd and Cameron

Clearly you've thought this through. You make a lot of sense. It makes sense to acquire the OA centreman and a puck moving dman. And perhaps I have underestimated the capability of this team with the additions of two OA's and another depth forward. Is there any chance Boucher sticks in the AHL? I hear the Ottawa Senators are going young in the A and it makes me wonder whether the Sens have him competing for a roster spot there. Thoughts??

I may have “theoretically” thought it through but I am still making some assumptions. I definitely can see a path where the 67’s decide to sell a couple players if things don’t go as planned.

Regarding Boucher, the word on the street is he will be in Ottawa pretty much 100%. Too many injuries last year and he needs to probably play a season with less competition to open up his scoring capabilities. Nothing is ever 100% but I think the development of the player requires him to be in Ottawa. The AHL team may be better with him on it but it isn’t about wha it’s better for the AHL team. He’s a first rounder. They need him to pay dividends at some point in the future.

At minimum, I think they will add an OA coming into the season when teams need to get under their allowable number of OA’s. If at some point in the season an Import becomes available at a reasonable price compared to a North American, I think they will pull the trigger if it’s the right fit. Whether they add a high priced Stud, that’s a big assumption on my part. 50/50 it happens? Maybe? It will depend on how they are positioned going into the Christmas break.
 
Last edited:
If it’s for my sake, the wolves will build a team that the F, D, G are similar ages and truly contend.
You are making assertions based on a pre-conceived opinion rather than what you have observed. The battalion was a contender for the first two years in NB and 3rd in conference the season after before needing a rebuild. The year before moving to NB, the battalion finished T-2nd in conference?
The (Brampton) battalion could never really make big additions for a run because 1300 fans does not afford a team to be truly bad and miss the playoffs.

NB was good last year and will be this, and seem set up well for a few years without a major rebuild.
Extra picks for 4-5 years can set up team for a while. It worked for the otters, ‘67s, hounds, firebirds. Barrie and OS are now pretty loaded as well.

Sorry. I Forgot you were a Sudbury guy. Another northern team. Jsut mixed that up!

We will agree to disagree regarding Stan Butler. I will always say that that team would have been better without him and I know a lot of people out there agree. But, he isn’t at the inept level of Larry Mavety! He’s on a different level alone by himself. Sad to speak poorly of the departed but just being real.
 
OMG

There is no guarantee that Rohrer would be back next year. I see him asking for the same deal as Rossi.

I agree the drafting for the past 2 first round sucked. We can blame covid but it will be up to Barlas to prove that he has the tools.

Before we start crapping on Killer remember that the goal for his teams was not to win championships but to provide excitng hockey that put bums in the seats and to develop players for the Pro's as well as players that become meaningful citizens.

Yes I agree that Killer could have retired as coach earlier and possibly given Peter Lee more time to develop. The challenge there was the other 2 people in charge.
 
OMG

There is no guarantee that Rohrer would be back next year. I see him asking for the same deal as Rossi.

I agree the drafting for the past 2 first round sucked. We can blame covid but it will be up to Barlas to prove that he has the tools.

Before we start crapping on Killer remember that the goal for his teams was not to win championships but to provide excitng hockey that put bums in the seats and to develop players for the Pro's as well as players that become meaningful citizens.

Yes I agree that Killer could have retired as coach earlier and possibly given Peter Lee more time to develop. The challenge there was the other 2 people in charge.

Rohrer isn’t in the same category as Rossi. Rohrer is a good player but he isn’t nearly a guaranteed NHLer coming out of the NHL Draft. The 67’s own his rights. As far as I know, he isn’t on loan. I cannot see Montreal making requests for a 3rd round pick to be sent to the AHL early. We’ve seen countless superior Imports through this league over the last ten years that were more impactful than Rohrer is projected to be sticking in the OHL for development when their rights were not on loan to their OHL Club.

Regarding Killer, I firmly believe he is the best developer of talent I know. Maybe there is a better developer out there but I don’t know who that person is. He also developed strong charactered men that have made solid contributions off the ice, not just in hockey.

My issue with Killer was his lack of willingness to bolster a lineup through trade to win a championship. IMO, the GM owes it to the team to make moves to improve the team when there is a strong chance. The GM does not allow a team to come from behind at the deadline. Conversely when your team is weak, you owe it to future teams to sell off a star player or two to recoup assets that can be used later. He didn’t do that which is why he had so many Finals appearances and very few wins in the second half of his career.

Any coach or GM that states their “goal” is anything other than to win Championships should be fired on the spot. If your organization is not focused on the goal of winning, you are in the wrong business. You may also incorporate other parameters like education and character building etc and maybe you don’t compromise everything to obtain that goal but it should still be the goal.

Major Junior hockey requires a skillful GM to navigate the cycle of junior hockey. I would agree your lows can’t be too low but you need to be willing to trade a kid like Couture when your team is in 8th place and going nowhere. He didn’t and then the following year he didn’t trade McGinn when they were in 8th place going nowhere. It can keep a team in perpetual agony in the standings by not flipping the required assets at the right time just as much as not helping your team by acquiring them when the time is right.

You also owe it to your loyal fanbase to make moves at the right time. They travel through this experience as well. They bankroll it. If the game is played a certain way and you choose to not play it that way and you never win a championship, you take your fanbase for granted. If the 67’s made the playoffs each of the following 30 years consecutive from today but never won a championship, is that considered success? Not good enough. Sorry. Not sorry.
 
OMG I hear what you are saying and agree today is a different breed than than the 90's.

The big difference that you neglected and know as well as me was not just killer but the ownership.
Earl and Howard wanted to won an OHL team but restricted the amount of money that could be spent.
Earl god bless him would not pay anything if he did not have to nd would scream that the media was not supporting him. Getting players is not just a player thing it is also getting a billet for the player that works.

Rohrer

I was not looking at him going AHL but possibly going back to Europe
 
OMG I hear what you are saying and agree today is a different breed than than the 90's.

The big difference that you neglected and know as well as me was not just killer but the ownership.
Earl and Howard wanted to won an OHL team but restricted the amount of money that could be spent.
Earl god bless him would not pay anything if he did not have to nd would scream that the media was not supporting him. Getting players is not just a player thing it is also getting a billet for the player that works.

Rohrer

I was not looking at him going AHL but possibly going back to Europe

Earl was a piece of sheet! Nuff said.

Regarding Rohrer, I highly doubt he would go back to Europe. He’s a 3rd round pick. If he goes back to Europe it would more likely be because Montreal did not sign him And we wouldn’t know that until after next season.
 
Last edited:
Rohrer isn’t in the same category as Rossi. Rohrer is a good player but he isn’t nearly a guaranteed NHLer coming out of the NHL Draft. The 67’s own his rights. As far as I know, he isn’t on loan. I cannot see Montreal making requests for a 3rd round pick to be sent to the AHL early. We’ve seen countless superior Imports through this league over the last ten years that were more impactful than Rohrer is projected to be sticking in the OHL for development when their rights were not on loan to their OHL Club.

Regarding Killer, I firmly believe he is the best developer of talent I know. Maybe there is a better developer out there but I don’t know who that person is. He also developed strong charactered men that have made solid contributions off the ice, not just in hockey.

My issue with Killer was his lack of willingness to bolster a lineup through trade to win a championship. IMO, the GM owes it to the team to make moves to improve the team when there is a strong chance. The GM does not allow a team to come from behind at the deadline. Conversely when your team is weak, you owe it to future teams to sell off a star player or two to recoup assets that can be used later. He didn’t do that which is why he had so many Finals appearances and very few wins in the second half of his career.

Any coach or GM that states their “goal” is anything other than to win Championships should be fired on the spot. If your organization is not focused on the goal of winning, you are in the wrong business. You may also incorporate other parameters like education and character building etc and maybe you don’t compromise everything to obtain that goal but it should still be the goal.

Major Junior hockey requires a skillful GM to navigate the cycle of junior hockey. I would agree your lows can’t be too low but you need to be willing to trade a kid like Couture when your team is in 8th place and going nowhere. He didn’t and then the following year he didn’t trade McGinn when they were in 8th place going nowhere. It can keep a team in perpetual agony in the standings by not flipping the required assets at the right time just as much as not helping your team by acquiring them when the time is right.

You also owe it to your loyal fanbase to make moves at the right time. They travel through this experience as well. They bankroll it. If the game is played a certain way and you choose to not play it that way and you never win a championship, you take your fanbase for granted. If the 67’s made the playoffs each of the following 30 years consecutive from today but never won a championship, is that considered success? Not good enough. Sorry. Not sorry.
What is the consensus on Cameron...is he a good developer of talent? I am of the opinion, he works better with more mature polished players.. I could be way off here but I get the feeling he's not great at developing young talent. Thoughts??
 
What is the consensus on Cameron...is he a good developer of talent? I am of the opinion, he works better with more mature polished players.. I could be way off here but I get the feeling he's not great at developing young talent. Thoughts??

He was out of junior for a long time so I think we need to see what transpires. And as Dirty already suggested, his stints in the OHL previously were short so the sample sizes aren’t great.

He is more systems oriented than Kilrea for sure. I have more faith in Tourigny too. I wasn’t all that thrilled when Cameron was named coach but I wasn’t pissed either. At least we have an experienced guy behind the bench.

The one thing we know is Cameron and Boyd have worked well together in the past so I imagine they are on the same page and Boyd has been solid at providing resources for development so I am sort of holding on to that.

All that said, I was pleasantly surprised by Pinelli last season but not happy about Sawyer, Barlas and Gill-Shane so is that on Cameron? Tough to say with a Pandemic shut down and a year lost.

I think this season will answer a lot of questions.
 
He was out of junior for a long time so I think we need to see what transpires. And as Dirty already suggested, his stints in the OHL previously were short so the sample sizes aren’t great.

He is more systems oriented than Kilrea for sure. I have more faith in Tourigny too. I wasn’t all that thrilled when Cameron was named coach but I wasn’t pissed either. At least we have an experienced guy behind the bench.

The one thing we know is Cameron and Boyd have worked well together in the past so I imagine they are on the same page and Boyd has been solid at providing resources for development so I am sort of holding on to that.

All that said, I was pleasantly surprised by Pinelli last season but not happy about Sawyer, Barlas and Gill-Shane so is that on Cameron? Tough to say with a Pandemic shut down and a year lost.

I think this season will answer a lot of questions.
Covid definitely stunted the growth curve for many. I think it's fair say this year will answer lots of questions. Pinelli is solid, Sawyer is so smooth but something is missing just not sure what and Gill-Shane is to soft and is taken out of the game if he is hit hard early but a nice skater and decent first pass.
 
Covid definitely stunted the growth curve for many. I think it's fair say this year will answer lots of questions. Pinelli is solid, Sawyer is so smooth but something is missing just not sure what and Gill-Shane is to soft and is taken out of the game if he is hit hard early but a nice skater and decent first pass.

Hill-Shane really leaves you wanting more. My impression of his game is same as yours. Big kid that needs to apply his size in front of the net. If he could develop a bit of a mean streak in front of the net, he could be a serious prospect. Good size, great skater and smooth with the puck.

There’s a big part of me that really wants to see Sawyer for at least the first month. He’s expendable with our numbers but he is a decent puck mover and has that mean streak. He could be a difference maker if he could turn it around.
 
Hill-Shane really leaves you wanting more. My impression of his game is same as yours. Big kid that needs to apply his size in front of the net. If he could develop a bit of a mean streak in front of the net, he could be a serious prospect. Good size, great skater and smooth with the puck.

There’s a big part of me that really wants to see Sawyer for at least the first month. He’s expendable with our numbers but he is a decent puck mover and has that mean streak. He could be a difference maker if he could turn it around.
I am with you on Sawyer. There's too much talent there to not see where he goes this year. He is expendable but not until you know more about how the team will fair in the conference. I am a NBB fan but I expect the 67's to be a serious threat this year. They play a solid structured game, work extremely hard and have enough talent to be a factor. You have said, add a top line player preferably a 20 year old centreman and 20 year old dman then the barber-poles should not be taken lightly that's for sure. Still to young to go for it but winning a playoff round isn't out of the question.
 
I am with you on Sawyer. There's too much talent there to not see where he goes this year. He is expendable but not until you know more about how the team will fair in the conference. I am a NBB fan but I expect the 67's to be a serious threat this year. They play a solid structured game, work extremely hard and have enough talent to be a factor. You have said, add a top line player preferably a 20 year old centreman and 20 year old dman then the barber-poles should not be taken lightly that's for sure. Still to young to go for it but winning a playoff round isn't out of the question.
The challenge with having so many D is that yes Boyd can say I want to trade X but if he gets a better deal trading Y does he not take it.

In order to get an OA Center that is any good we are going to have to provide something that people want. Constantini is not going to get you an OA center however Sawyer and the same picks might. It is going to depend on the market again you are looking not for the Best Player Avail but the best deal available.
Most teams are going to go with what they have in camp so I think we are going to end up with players that will be traded for picks (not a good thing unless they can be used for trading)

What could throw the OHL into a free for all is if Seattle returns Wright with the provision that he is traded. Wright does not like Caputi.
 
I am with you on Sawyer. There's too much talent there to not see where he goes this year. He is expendable but not until you know more about how the team will fair in the conference. I am a NBB fan but I expect the 67's to be a serious threat this year. They play a solid structured game, work extremely hard and have enough talent to be a factor. You have said, add a top line player preferably a 20 year old centreman and 20 year old dman then the barber-poles should not be taken lightly that's for sure. Still to young to go for it but winning a playoff round isn't out of the question.

To be clear or maybe more precise, I think if they added a viable OA Centre that can play top two lines in an effort to stretch out their lines, I think that is enough to get in the mix. They’d probably still be a step behind the bonafide contenders.

I “think” they need an upgrade on Costantini if they want to be with the contenders. I like Costantini. I think he brings value to this team. But, they are missing that element of PP QB. I think that element would be ridiculously costly unless it is an OA. That means the most viable option is through an upgrade for Costantini.

Those two pieces, in my opinion, puts them with the company of Peterborough, Barrie, North Bay and Mississauga. Neither of those two pieces would be overly costly. We would get a return for Costantini and with some of the extra D-Men, we could get some pieces to use there too.

However, none of the above teams have made any moves. At least two of them will make moves. One probably makes significant moves In an effort to separate themselves from the pack. Is Ottawa then willing to keep pace after adding two pieces of their own already? THAT is the question. If it takes them two trades to be part of the cool kids group then how far are they willing to go to stay with them?

So, is this the right year? Probably not. But with Barlas not showing well and Moldenhauer not reporting and subsequently traded, we are short two 1st rounders that would be 18 and 19 next year and should have been a significant part of any run we’d likely have had next year. So, do they trade and skip next year too? Either way, I don’t see next year as a viable year so they can make a run this year and trade an asset or two next year to recoup what they traded away this year. That is sort of my thought process on this. They would get some solid experience contending this season that the younger players can take with them which is a huge part of development.

No matter what, out of the ten D-Men they have signed, 8 are eligible to return (two would be OA’s). They can afford to trade two D-Men (provided one is an ‘02 or ‘03) and not significantly impact the blueline next year. Let’s start there and see where it leads us.
 
The challenge with having so many D is that yes Boyd can say I want to trade X but if he gets a better deal trading Y does he not take it.

In order to get an OA Center that is any good we are going to have to provide something that people want. Constantini is not going to get you an OA center however Sawyer and the same picks might. It is going to depend on the market again you are looking not for the Best Player Avail but the best deal available.
Most teams are going to go with what they have in camp so I think we are going to end up with players that will be traded for picks (not a good thing unless they can be used for trading)

What could throw the OHL into a free for all is if Seattle returns Wright with the provision that he is traded. Wright does not like Caputi.

I think that is plausible. We did see that last season with the Belanger trade vs what would have been a Costantini trade. However, they were selling last season so they had the luxury of making that sort of move without impacting their overall goal. To make that sort of move this season could affect their overall goal.

EXAMPLE: They decide to move Sirman and keep Mayich but Mayich nets two 2nds and Sirman nets a 2nd and a 4th. Would they shift their focus based on the trade return in that situation? I don’t think so. I think they keep the player they feel fits their situation better.

I think the better question is whether they would be willing to send Marrelli and Ewles down to JrA BECAUSE they weren’t able to work out a trade package for a player they’d prefer to move. I think a quandary like that is more likely. Would they be willing to send down a 1st round pick prospect in an effort to not waive a player for nothing In return or accept a return they wouldn’t be happy with? Would they risk alienating a prospect like Marrelli in an effort to give a player like Sawyer enough runway in the fist month to prove Boyd’s asking price? Are they willing to play Mews at forward the first half of the season to make room to keep more D-Men Because the trade returns aren’t where they need them to be?

I think we need to look more at this Situation to be honest.
 
I think that is plausible. We did see that last season with the Belanger trade vs what would have been a Costantini trade. However, they were selling last season so they had the luxury of making that sort of move without impacting their overall goal. To make that sort of move this season could affect their overall goal.

EXAMPLE: They decide to move Sirman and keep Mayich but Mayich nets two 2nds and Sirman nets a 2nd and a 4th. Would they shift their focus based on the trade return in that situation? I don’t think so. I think they keep the player they feel fits their situation better.

I think the better question is whether they would be willing to send Marrelli and Ewles down to JrA BECAUSE they weren’t able to work out a trade package for a player they’d prefer to move. I think a quandary like that is more likely. Would they be willing to send down a 1st round pick prospect in an effort to not waive a player for nothing In return or accept a return they wouldn’t be happy with? Would they risk alienating a prospect like Marrelli in an effort to give a player like Sawyer enough runway in the fist month to prove Boyd’s asking price? Are they willing to play Mews at forward the first half of the season to make room to keep more D-Men Because the trade returns aren’t where they need them to be?

I think we need to look more at this Situation to be honest.
I thin k before they can do anything this team has to decide what it is.

Could it be a top 4 team Yes
Could it be a bottom 4 scrape into the playoffs team yes

While I see this team making the playoffs there are a lot oaf questions that need to be addressed.

1. Is Cameron for real? Can he motivate and develop the players on this team?
2. Is Beck for real and can he be the scoring machine we thought he would be last year or is he damaged goods.
3. Is this Defence ready for prime time?
4. Was Donoso a fluke last year or is he the real deal.
5 Does Ottawa's line up surpass most of the other division teams?

I would argue the every team in the division at least on paper is as strong or stronger than us.
 
As far as the defense not developing last year, I think the 67's really miss Mario Duhamel. What he did with the defense the two years he was here was outstanding. He turned Hoefenmayer around.

I think you will see Sirman on the wing, before you will see Mews, if Sirman does not get traded.
 
I thin k before they can do anything this team has to decide what it is.

Could it be a top 4 team Yes
Could it be a bottom 4 scrape into the playoffs team yes

While I see this team making the playoffs there are a lot oaf questions that need to be addressed.

1. Is Cameron for real? Can he motivate and develop the players on this team?
2. Is Beck for real and can he be the scoring machine we thought he would be last year or is he damaged goods.
3. Is this Defence ready for prime time?
4. Was Donoso a fluke last year or is he the real deal.
5 Does Ottawa's line up surpass most of the other division teams?

I would argue the every team in the division at least on paper is as strong or stronger than us.

The first step is to acquire the missing pieces. We know they need a centre and they have an OA spot available. So, the cost of acquisition is not overly expensive.

They know they have too many D-Men. They need to evaluate whether they actually have 10 D-Men or not. Are all ten viable OHL D-Men? If so, which ones are the eight they want to keep? The other two, depending on age etc would be either sent down to JrA, traded or waived if they cannot be traded.

Once those two things are done, they then have a roster of 23 players they will enter the season with. They may not have the centre by the start of the season but you know what I mean.

Once they have their roster, they will then play games to assess where their roster stands. I think the depth on the wings combined with an overall solid group of defensemen will give them opportunities to win Games.

Every team requires players to advance their development and translate that into higher levels of performance. Ottawa is in no different situation as any of the other teams. There is a level of expectation based on the law of averages for player development. Some teams exceed that average and others fall below that average. We don’t know where any of these teams will truly end up. All we can assess is the likelihood of theright abilities based on the leading indicators present. The leading indicators suggest Ottawa needs a Centre with experience that can play top two lines. Maybe the other teams at the top don’t need anything to be in the mix. Those teams are ahead of Ottawa. But, OA’s become available as the eason commences so I anticipate the 67’s to fill their OA spot within two weeks of the first puck drop.
 
As far as the defense not developing last year, I think the 67's really miss Mario Duhamel. What he did with the defense the two years he was here was outstanding. He turned Hoefenmayer around.

I think you will see Sirman on the wing, before you will see Mews, if Sirman does not get traded.

It is so bloody hard to judge because of that lost season. Additionally, the 67’s were poised for another trip to the Finals the year previous so they lost a lot of development time there too.

I know I was hard of Sawyer but only because I expected so much more. But, both Mayich and Sirman impressed as 17 year old rookies.

Regarding D-Men playing on the wing, I doubt they put Mews ont he wing. If they only cared about what was best for the team in the short term, they would put Mews ont he wing and let him QB the PP. But they do need to develop him because he is a valuable asset going into the future. Playing him on the wing for any extended period of time would stunt his growth.

I do believe Sirman will play some wing but the more wing he plays, the more I question why they keep him. No disrespect to Sirman but if Mayich plays with Matier then there is only space for two of Sawyer, Smyth, and Sirman on the left side. Someone has to go because you also need to give Marrelli some ice time.
 
The challenge with having so many D is that yes Boyd can say I want to trade X but if he gets a better deal trading Y does he not take it.

In order to get an OA Center that is any good we are going to have to provide something that people want. Constantini is not going to get you an OA center however Sawyer and the same picks might. It is going to depend on the market again you are looking not for the Best Player Avail but the best deal available.
Most teams are going to go with what they have in camp so I think we are going to end up with players that will be traded for picks (not a good thing unless they can be used for trading)

What could throw the OHL into a free for all is if Seattle returns Wright with the provision that he is traded. Wright does not like Caputi.
He will be returned, but will play less than 2 games for Caputi. Well known fact Seattle wants him out and so does he
 
Well, we now know what Jack Beck went through last year. Knee injury, lacerated kidney, fractured hand.

Figured it was an internal injury. Good to know he is healthy and ready to attack the season.

Good to know he is healthy and ready to attack!
 
Last edited:
Figured it was an internal injury. Good to know he is healthy and ready to attack the season.

Good to know he is healthy and ready to attack!
him and Boucher red going to be a line that frustrates other teams. Even Cam would be good on that line.

Rohrer and Stonehouse should be a good pairing.

The problem will be scoring and what they have to back them up.

I agree that an OA center would be nice, but I am still holding out hope that one of the others shows they are ready,

If Wright is a possibility, then I think we should be able to put together a pretty good package to compete with the rest of the league for him.
 
him and Boucher red going to be a line that frustrates other teams. Even Cam would be good on that line.

Rohrer and Stonehouse should be a good pairing.

The problem will be scoring and what they have to back them up.

I agree that an OA center would be nice, but I am still holding out hope that one of the others shows they are ready,

If Wright is a possibility, then I think we should be able to put together a pretty good package to compete with the rest of the league for him.

I just don’t see Wright coming back and if he were to come back and be traded, for Ottawa it would be a deadline deal and it would start with Henry Mews and finish with a ton of additional draft picks….. I don’t like that deal, AT ALL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad