AGranderson
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2022
- 464
- 289
I believe Ottawa is adding a top player to the back end and that will be it.
I personally think Kingston may have screwed up with wright.
I would have thought that they would have made a deal long before this when there was a market for him.
As I have said I knew long ago he was not staying in Seattle there just was not the room for him especially how they are doing.
That meant that it was a fait accompli that he was coming back after the WJC.
I would have thought that Kingston would have made the deal and had it completed before the WJHC ended.
I was thinking it would be Seattle is returning Shane Wright to Kingston
Kingston Frontenacs announce the trade of Shane Wright to XYZ about an hour later.
While Wright is a star player he is definitely no longer worth more than Morrison or a couple of lesser-known players that have been traded.
Not because of ability but because whoever trades with the Front has them by the short and curlies.
Kingston has to trade him.
Almost no one wants him
He has a few teams that he will go to.
Personally I do not think they will get a 2006 they are going to get picks and it is all their own fault.
London has RD that KGN does not. The Frontenacs were likely thinking Christoforo, Akey, Bonk, Mews all along.If Wright isn’t willing to go to Barrie, who could they pivot to? Are there any other elite forward options on the market?
What if they throw a wrench in things and deal Brandt Clarke and push all their chips in next year instead? Acquiring Savard still works well for next year, as he’ll be an OA.
It will be interesting to see what they get.London has RD that KGN does not. The Frontenacs were likely thinking Christoforo, Akey, Bonk, Mews all along.
Who says Wright limited KGN to one team? It sure seems Spits, Knights, Petes, Colts, ‘67s were in discussions for Wright.It will be interesting to see what they get.
I still think it was not a class act by Wright to limit it to 1 team.
’m not saying it went down exactly like that but the NHL Insiders are all saying it is up to Wright to choose his landing spot. They are saying he chose LondonWho says Wright limited KGN to one team? It sure seems Spits, Knights, Petes, Colts, ‘67s were in discussions for Wright.
I’ll guess the hold up was KGN either asking too much, or holding out for the RD none of those teams can afford to part with. On the teams listed there is a RD that is useful now and a bigger part in the future.
’m not saying it went down exactly like that but the NHL Insiders are all saying it is up to Wright to choose his landing spot. They are saying he chose London
I think that if Ottawa and the Colts were in then they would be able to put together a better offer than London.
That sounds about right to me,I think everyone also needs to remember that the players going back to Kingston will likely all have no trade clauses as 16 and 17 year olds.
If they are negotiating with London, the first player on their list would be Dickinson. He wouldn’t waive his no trade. No chance. The next player on their list would be Bonk. Highly unlikely he waives his no trade to go to Kingston either.
The next guy on the list would be Barkey. I highly doubt London makes him available. So then it comes down to Cowan and Paris. Kingston would need both of those players to even come close to making it work and there is no way they want to drill that far down their roster for 17 year olds.
So if they can’t get Barkey or Bonk which I highly doubt they will, I think they would need to pivot to a combination of Cowan and Edward. Centre and LD. Both will contribute right now and next season. Add some picks to it and call it a day.
That sounds about right to me,
Cowen, Edward and a few picks
Or
Paris, Leonard and many picks
He's got a no trade, his pick.It will be interesting to see what they get.
I still think it was not a class act by Wright to limit it to 1 team.
Why should they capitulate ?Of course it’s up to the player with the NTC. It was not an issue when MacTavish was granted his wish to be with friends in Hamilton. It should not be an issue if Wright prefers to be coached by Hunter.
Ottawa and Barrie can make just as good of an offer and better than London if Kingston is fine with a pick over payment. I think Kingston is trying to get one of Akey, Bonk, or Mews.
Though what they may want and what they can get are two very different things.
I'd expect elite young players back.That sounds about right to me,
Cowen, Edward and a few picks
Or
Paris, Leonard and many picks
Cowen is likely to be drafted this year, rated as a C prospect and Edward is drafted. They project as 5 years total of a top 6 fwd and top pairing D.I'd expect elite young players back.
London can always find an elite somewhere else.
To me, Cowan and Edward check the boxes required for Kingston. If they cant’t get a similar player to what Missy got in either of the Del or Beck trades trades then they need a package that make sense in the aggregate. Those players plus a couple 2nds and a couple 3rds gets them there in the aggregate.Cowen is likely to be drafted this year, rated as a C prospect and Edward is drafted. They project as 5 years total of a top 6 fwd and top pairing D.
I don’t understand why that wouldn’t be considered value for Wright. These are blue chip productive players now.
Akey is too important now and later to trade imo. Beaudoin is on the table, or Barrie is not really interested.He's got a no trade, his pick.
Why should they capitulate ?
I'd either get what I want or he finishes in Kingston .
Akey is too important now and later to trade imo. Beaudoin is on the table, or Barrie is not really interested.
London has lots of options if they want Wright. They just to be reasonable and offer Barkey or Bonk, or maybe offer Cowan & George. Bonk is probably not finished secondary school, so both he and Barkey would have to waive their NTC.
Kingston also has to reasonable and somewhat flexible as time is on their side. They can accept a good package, to exchange for pieces they prefer later.
Remembering that I was a Fronts fan the one thing I can say is that if Wright says London or no and London is not able to make a fair trade that is at least in the Morrison ballpark Fans will blow their cool.I don’t know what will happen but I don’t see London as a fit. I don’t think London really wants him. If they did, a trade would be announced already. I think this is going to come down to a conversation on Monday of him playing in Kingston or pick another team.
The Wright return will dwarf the Morrison return. The player(s) offered and wanted can affect what other moves have to be made; that can make it difficult to settle.Remembering that I was a Fronts fan the one thing I can say is that if Wright says London or no and London is not able to make a fair trade that is at least in the Morrison ballpark Fans will blow their cool.
To me the Wright family are blackmailing the Fronts.
If I was a ticket holder and Kingston took a crap deal I would be upset.
I would rather look at Wright and say this is it you want London only and they have nothing to offer so there is no deal sorry. You either play out your year here or the Kraken can pay you or you can go home and play by yourself.
KINGSTON HAS A LOT OF POWER IN THIS THEY JUST HVE TO HAVE THE CAHONES TO USE IT.
I don't think so London does not have the parts left to make the deal nor do they have the impetus when they are the only team involved.The Wright return will dwarf the Morrison return. The player(s) offered and wanted can affect what other moves have to be made; that can make it difficult to settle.
That’s not a viable option. This isn’t a video game. They HAVE to move him and he has a NTC. There is no playing hard ball here to make a point. That’s not how this works. Sounds like the return will be very good anyway so I don’t see the problem.He's got a no trade, his pick.
Why should they capitulate ?
I'd either get what I want or he finishes in Kingston .