Your not welcomed on hereToropchenko is a third liner and has 4 goals in the last two. I hope no one continues to question Guelph's depth.
Your not welcomed on hereToropchenko is a third liner and has 4 goals in the last two. I hope no one continues to question Guelph's depth.
Nothing wrong with his post. Read the rules. MODYour not welcomed on here
I just think it would probably be best suited on the Guelph post where people would appreciate it more as I’m sure no one here wants to read that except him and yourselfNothing wrong with his post. Read the rules. MOD
Other than the goal where he gave up the rebound (the 2nd I believe), the goals have been good. he would have needed to make the big save somehow to keep them out.
It isn't really Andree. I think the team in front of him was far too passive and repeatedly tried bad passes at the wrong time. The late surge isn't impressive. Getting two goals when you're down 3 is nothing but perhaps a bit of motivation. We shall see. We never did get that big save, but I didn't see anywhere enough push from the whole team.
I'd put Chem/Clark/Keats on them as we have the last line change.Tourigny will also have to think about his line match-ups for Game 5. Guelph's top line has just been abusing us for two games straight - we have no answer for them, and need to find one quickly.
I don’t think either team played well tonight or at least not well enough to be happy with anything other than a win in the column for Guelph.
I disagree hockey comments are quite welcome Storm watcher. Great to have comments from other fans to fuel the discussion.Your not welcomed on here
I just think it would probably be best suited on the Guelph post where people would appreciate it more as I’m sure no one here wants to read that except him and yourself
In all fairness that poster isnt exactly the type that can add to a discussion with the oppositions fan base. He loves his team which there is absolutely nothing wrong with but the post robray quoted is clearly an antagonostic post on another teams form. I am all for discussing with the oppositions fans but only if their intentions are to actually discuss not flame. There are some 67s fans that are the same and they should likely stay on their own form as well.I disagree hockey comments are quite welcome Storm watcher. Great to have comments from other fans to fuel the discussion.
I agreed that the defense needed an upgrade at trade deadline time but a lot of people were saying oh we are just fine. I was hoping for Durzi, Eliot, etc. who would have really helped puck movement with our speedy forwards. The defense is too slow and as a result we are always stuck in our own end. George Burnett is a very good coach and he is exploiting the cracks in our armour.LR8, Jan 13, 2019
Mistake not too strengthen the d at the deadline. They have looked out of their element this weekend. Speed is a bit of an issue but lack of puck skills is a real issue. Turn overs, throwing pucks away, and poor pp presence. Lots of time to fix it but work to do. Not sure the skill is there?
Stand by the above. Millpond pointed out Durzi was available. 67's do not seem to have the back end needed to play at higher speed and skill level required. There is a stylistic difference between the forward and defence groups. Either be big grinding, banging type of team like the D, or a smaller speed, skill group like the forwards. When one group does not compliment the other to some degree, both have issues. You can't change the forwards into a big banging, heavy group (nor should you as that game is done), so hopefully the D can pick up the skill level and pace to play with and complement the forward group. It is not over but cracks are beginning to show.
In all fairness that poster isnt exactly the type that can add to a discussion with the oppositions fan base. He loves his team which there is absolutely nothing wrong with but the post robray quoted is clearly an antagonostic post on another teams form. I am all for discussing with the oppositions fans but only if their intentions are to actually discuss not flame. There are some 67s fans that are the same and they should likely stay on their own form as well.
As an outsider, it was awesome seeing the 67's go all in for DiPietro but then so disappointing that they didn't do anything to upgrade the defence. With DiPietro likely headed to the AHL next season, it's surprising that they would go all in for a rental without upgrading the support in front of him. I realize that Ottawa probably wanted to save some assets for next season as well but what they did was similar to sharping one hockey skate but not the other.LR8, Jan 13, 2019
Mistake not too strengthen the d at the deadline. They have looked out of their element this weekend. Speed is a bit of an issue but lack of puck skills is a real issue. Turn overs, throwing pucks away, and poor pp presence. Lots of time to fix it but work to do. Not sure the skill is there?
Stand by the above. Millpond pointed out Durzi was available. 67's do not seem to have the back end needed to play at higher speed and skill level required. There is a stylistic difference between the forward and defence groups. Either be big grinding, banging type of team like the D, or a smaller speed, skill group like the forwards. When one group does not compliment the other to some degree, both have issues. You can't change the forwards into a big banging, heavy group (nor should you as that game is done), so hopefully the D can pick up the skill level and pace to play with and complement the forward group. It is not over but cracks are beginning to show.