Proposal: Ott/Edm - Ott/Col - Ott/Arizona
- Thread starter Daffy
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Stuzchuk
Registered User
1) I dont want Yakupov on my team... plain and simple
2) We need a scorer more than the 2-way play/Leadership that Ladeskog brings
3) Lazar is set to become what Landeskog would bring back (except for the offensive upside), so may as well keep him
2) We need a scorer more than the 2-way play/Leadership that Ladeskog brings
3) Lazar is set to become what Landeskog would bring back (except for the offensive upside), so may as well keep him
Col, wont be moving their captain .For Hoffman,the other two pieces would be of value .But we add a better winger possibly Stone for this to happen ,which we wont do .So no deal here 
1) Edmonton would just keep Yapukov instead probably.
2) Wouldn't do it as a Sens fan. We need Chabot too much.
3) Arizona declines easily.
2) Wouldn't do it as a Sens fan. We need Chabot too much.
3) Arizona declines easily.
1. Way too much to give up for Yakupov. Even if Ottawa is about to lose Puempel to waivers, Ottawa has zero use for Yakupov.
2. Seriously doubt Colorado entertains an offer like this for Landeskog, they could get more. Also, even if they do it, Ottawa is getting great production from Hoffman already. Why take this risk and give up Ottawa's only serious top-4 defensive prospect.
3. I'm not even going to bother addressing the value, but the trade makes no sense for other reasons. Ottawa needs a bottom pairing LHD to play with Wideman, not a top-4 RHD. Who is Stone going to replace? Ceci? How much of an upgrade is that? With this trade Ottawa will end up playing either Ceci or Stone on the bottom pairing, Wideman in the pressbox, and having no one to play beside Ceci/Stone now that you've traded Boro.
2. Seriously doubt Colorado entertains an offer like this for Landeskog, they could get more. Also, even if they do it, Ottawa is getting great production from Hoffman already. Why take this risk and give up Ottawa's only serious top-4 defensive prospect.
3. I'm not even going to bother addressing the value, but the trade makes no sense for other reasons. Ottawa needs a bottom pairing LHD to play with Wideman, not a top-4 RHD. Who is Stone going to replace? Ceci? How much of an upgrade is that? With this trade Ottawa will end up playing either Ceci or Stone on the bottom pairing, Wideman in the pressbox, and having no one to play beside Ceci/Stone now that you've traded Boro.
But how can you resist Mark Borowiecki?
That leadership and character! Good ol' Canadian boy too.
But how can you resist Mark Borowiecki?
Yeah I could have definitely added more to the Arizona proposal lol. My bad on that.
Yakupov I think is worth taking a chance on and I think Ottawa needs tougher players to play against in their top six, hence Hoffman for Landy.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
I have a feeling the Avs wouldn't trade Landeskog for another left winger. I believe the only way he'd be on the table is for a defender.
Makar Goes Fast
grocery stick
http://ottawacitizen.com/sports/hoc...eating-as-he-leaves-senators-development-camp
good luck, youre likely gonna need a lot more than Charbot.
And Edmonton has zero use for Puempel. Who comes up with this idiotic proposals?
bert
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2002
- 37,576
- 23,899
The only deal i would do is the last one. The rest are brutal for Ottawa.
I wouldnt deal a 3rd for Yakupov alone and I dont value Puemple much at all, but Yakupov has no hockey sense.
bert
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2002
- 37,576
- 23,899
Oh no an 18 year old had a poor rookie camp may as well cut him now and get rid of him for free.
Rather keep Yakupov than add a LW that wouldn't even make the Oilers. Lucic, Pouliot, Maroon, Hendricks
Jarey Curry
Avalanche of Makar
SometimesY
Fly
- Jun 9, 2011
- 3,691
- 0
Really confused about Landeskog, youngest captain in Avs history, rookie of the year. Why doesn't Roy like him?
IWantSakicAsMyGM
Registered User
cgf
FireBednarsSuccessor
...because Roy doesn't like anybody except for Nick Holden, who he'll never allow to be traded...
1) Yes, I'd do this. I think Yak will rebound on another team and I've personally never been a big fan of Puempel.
2) Don't want to give up Chabot even though Landeskog is a fantastic player; prefer to just stay the course with Hoffman and Chabot.
3) I don't think Ottawa can afford to add another young defender given that they will probably lose one already to the expansion draft – a trade for a player like Stone should happen next offseason. In terms of acquisitions, I'd be very cognizant of how such a trade would affect the team in a year's time when it comes to giving LV a player. Better to just find a serviceable veteran UFA and give them a one-year deal.
2) Don't want to give up Chabot even though Landeskog is a fantastic player; prefer to just stay the course with Hoffman and Chabot.
3) I don't think Ottawa can afford to add another young defender given that they will probably lose one already to the expansion draft – a trade for a player like Stone should happen next offseason. In terms of acquisitions, I'd be very cognizant of how such a trade would affect the team in a year's time when it comes to giving LV a player. Better to just find a serviceable veteran UFA and give them a one-year deal.
Latest posts
-
Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | Part Deux- Latest: Freaky Styley
-
-
-
Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | 4 Nations Break Edition- Latest: theguardianII
