SpezDispenser
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2007
- 27,168
- 6,716
That's ridiculous.Wouldn't do Newhook for Norris either.
Let it go man let it go
That's ridiculous.Wouldn't do Newhook for Norris either.
Let it go man let it go
That's ridiculous.
Too funny. No it's youIt shouldn’t. You clearly don’t have any sense of player value here. Nor contract status.
It’s not me. It’s you.
Wait and see he's 2 years younger and playing down the lineup and low ice time. Norris wasn't even in the NHL yet at that age.That's ridiculous.
Conner would be a reach and Avs likely add something meaningful. Ehlers and Nylander are closest in value.I mean you literally asked for Kyle Connor which is pretty laughable. Girard is a solid #2 on a good contract but he doesnt return a young star forward like him. Like would you trade Rantanen for Girard?
Wait and see he's 2 years younger and playing down the lineup and low ice time. Norris wasn't even in the NHL yet at that age.
Time will tell
Ironically we are bantering over 2 true Newfies
Conner would be a reach and Avs likely add something meaningful. Ehlers and Nylander are closest in value.
Rantanen is one of the best 10-15 players on the planet so he’s a different thing altogether. Not many guys touch his value.
Girard is an elite 2nd pair on a good team or top pair on several lesser teams.
Yeah you are definitely over valuing him. Maybe Boeser or Fiala but I would rather have Nylander and EhlersConner would be a reach and Avs likely add something meaningful. Ehlers and Nylander are closest in value.
Rantanen is one of the best 10-15 players on the planet so he’s a different thing altogether. Not many guys touch his value.
Girard is an elite 2nd pair on a good team or top pair on several lesser teams.
Wait and see he's 2 years younger and playing down the lineup and low ice time. Norris wasn't even in the NHL yet at that age.
Time will tell
Ironically we are bantering over 2 true Newfies
Norris was putting up 31 goals and 61 points in 56 AHL games to win rookie of the year at that age. He coulda easily been playing in the NHL and probably should have been.
Newhook and Norris offensively is a wash. In fact their pNHLe is almost identical putting them at ~65 point potential which I think is what we will reasonably see for them both. The area where I take Norris though is he is elite defensively and always has been. When Norris was drafted he was projected as a defensive 3rd liner and his offensive potential only came in later years. Now he plays against opponents top lines and shuts them down. Time will tell who will be the better player but even if Newhook is a 70 point C and Norris is a 60 point C, I would take the more complete player.
Norris was putting up 31 goals and 61 points in 56 AHL games to win rookie of the year at that age. He coulda easily been playing in the NHL and probably should have been.
Newhook and Norris offensively is a wash. In fact their pNHLe is almost identical putting them at ~65 point potential which I think is what we will reasonably see for them both. The area where I take Norris though is he is elite defensively and always has been. When Norris was drafted he was projected as a defensive 3rd liner and his offensive potential only came in later years. Now he plays against opponents top lines and shuts them down. Time will tell who will be the better player but even if Newhook is a 70 point C and Norris is a 60 point C, I would take the more complete player.
Im pretty sure Jets fans considered Ehlers better than Connor last season and he has better contract. Toronto fans also were not keen on Nylander Girard swap.
People are really not that interested in small D
Norris is 4 years younger than Mack and is outpacing his 21yo season. Norris >Mack obviously based on this dumb ass criteria
Girard is the best transition dman in the league.
Just sayin
You have zero handle on value dude. No handle of player value and clearly zero handle on contract value.Yeah you are definitely over valuing him. Maybe Boeser or Fiala but I would rather have Nylander and Ehlers
RFA's...You have zero handle on value dude. No handle of player value and clearly zero handle on contract value.
a trade like this would also value position and team need.
fiala and boeswr are both on expiring deals.
With high dollar values to resign. Boeser is a $7mm qualifying I believe. Fiala will go to arbitration and already proved that.RFA's...
Arbitration isnt a threat, its player security. Nearly every player that is eligible for arbitration signs for it or is highly suggested to sign for it. Once a player signs for arbitration they cant be given an offersheet. Also once a player has a contract decided by an arbitrator they are no longer eligible to file for arbitration again, thats usually why most deals are signed before the arbitration date.With high dollar values to resign. Boeser is a $7mm qualifying I believe. Fiala will go to arbitration and already proved that.
Then you'd be canned. Ottawa is the worst team in the league for a reason. Overated big time.It really is at this point. It’s possible Newhook matches or exceeds Norris, but that’s 100% banking on potential. I’d swap Newhook for Norris in a heartbeat and run before anyone knew what happened.
Arbitration means he signs a one year deal the team doesn’t control. And then he’s heading to free agency. That sucks for the team. No control. And it will be a high AAV.Arbitration isnt a threat, its player security. Nearly every player that is eligible for arbitration signs for it or is highly suggested to sign for it. Once a player signs for arbitration they cant be given an offersheet. Also once a player has a contract decided by an arbitrator they are no longer eligible to file for arbitration again, thats usually why most deals are signed before the arbitration date.
No that's only if they get to an arbitrator and the arbitrator makes the dealArbitration means he signs a one year deal the team doesn’t control. And then he’s heading to free agency. That sucks for the team. No control. And it will be a high AAV.