TheNumber4
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 44,237
- 55,180
Well odd man wouldn’t be the fault of zone. Maybe a lack of awareness by the defenceman on pinches.Which is why they give up so many odd man rushes and scoring chances....
Well odd man wouldn’t be the fault of zone. Maybe a lack of awareness by the defenceman on pinches.Which is why they give up so many odd man rushes and scoring chances....
Well, for starters, the Peeke deal is fine even if it was viewed as an overpay at the time. He's a really solid defender and still has upside. The Bruins missed him against FLA.
Secondly, if Sweeney only had one dance partner and Ullmark isn't extending in OTT, there's not much else he can do but take what Staios is willing to pay, unless he walks away at which point fans would flame him anyway.
So, while I am disappointed, most if that has to do with having unrealistic expectations for a better package and having no control over the outcome. Atrocious is too strong a word, especially if there were only two possible outcomes and neither of their were ideal. Sweeney had the deal to LA and Ullmark snuffed it...so, dang, it;s not like he didn't put in the effort.
Lastly, they have the draft and then July 1 - so this story isn't over yet.
And if korpisalo has a .905 and wins 15/20 of 30 starts or backups are signing for 3 mil plus after the cap goes up then this isn’t as bad on Boston either.another thing is if Ullmark just puts up a 91% save percentage and Forsberg like 90.5%, that'll already significantly improve our standings, even if we somehow score the exact same amount of goals as in 2023-2024. If Ullmark has a 91.5% save percentage or miraculously has a 2022-2023 performance, Ottawa is laughing in riches.
The issue is Peeke has been a below replacement level player his entire career and is being paid close to $3m for multiple years. There is close to zero chance he returns value on that bloated contract.
I did not have unrealistic expectations for an ullmark trade. The issue comes from acquiring one of the worst assets in the league to facilitate the trade.
5.75m for below replacement level performance. Thats $4m too much. I realize the story isnt over yet, but what in his track record makes you think that Don Sweeney is creative and aggressive enough to take this team from a below average 5v5 hockey club with great goalies to an above average one with one great goalie? This is a poor first step.
The issue is Peeke has been a below replacement level player his entire career and is being paid close to $3m for multiple years. There is close to zero chance he returns value on that bloated contract.
I did not have unrealistic expectations for an ullmark trade. The issue comes from acquiring one of the worst assets in the league to facilitate the trade.
5.75m for below replacement level performance. Thats $4m too much. I realize the story isnt over yet, but what in his track record makes you think that Don Sweeney is creative and aggressive enough to take this team from a below average 5v5 hockey club with great goalies to an above average one with one great goalie? This is a poor first step.
Surprised they didn't use one of the many pics of Swayman and Ullmark doing their postgame hug tradition.
Gotta say I'm gonna miss seeing that.
Well odd man wouldn’t be the fault of zone. Maybe a lack of awareness by the defenceman on pinches.
But honestly how. He was the worst goaltender in the league by every statistical category and the eye test not only matched but it hammers it home. He let in the first or second shot like 14 times. Constant back breaking goals at horrible times. Yes he is talented the eye test says that but he is a mental midget. He breaks out of his stance or over plays a puck for no reason.And if korpisalo has a .905 and wins 15/20 of 30 starts or backups are signing for 3 mil plus after the cap goes up then this isn’t as bad on Boston either.
Just don’t know how the bruins didn’t end up with the 12th OA or a prospect out of this for taking the contract on. Just bad asset management which is a toxic organizational trait.
A poster on the bruins board put it best, the bruins treated korpisalo as a positive value asset not a negative one.
People just upset or confused that Ottawa was able to get Ullmark for cheap and rid themselves of a bad goalie and horrible contract. Enjoy the win.So now Korpisalo is Vezina goalie and Ullmark a Korpisalo, how things can change quickly.
its not about fault.Well odd man wouldn’t be the fault of zone. Maybe a lack of awareness by the defenceman on pinches.
I was always heavily against him being our target even before that dreadful contract announcement dropped, but it really is unbelievable how quickly he showed to be an issue. Like you said, bad feelings from game 1 and was evident within the first week to 10 days that he was an albatross contract. Then he re-enforced it throughout the year.But honestly how. He was the worst goaltender in the league by every statistical category and the eye test not only matched but it hammers it home. He let in the first or second shot like 14 times. Constant back breaking goals at horrible times. Yes he is talented the eye test says that but he is a mental midget. He breaks out of his stance or over plays a puck for no reason.
First game of the year the sens battled back against Carolina to tie it on the road down 2. He lets in the next shot from the point over his blocker shoulder he tried to catch. I knew right away this guy is a big mistake.
How ? Linus is there only for 1 year. They paid a price for a rental from what I'm seeing here.What a great trade for Ottawa
By getting out of Korpisalo's contract. Assumption was it was gonna need to be bought out, or this price paid to dump it. Ottawa wanted out from under it as a priority and now they can test drive a substantially more proven Ullmark that doesn't have below league average stats 3 of the last 4 seasons with 4 years of costly term attached.How ? Linus is there only for 1 year. They paid a price for a rental from what I'm seeing here.
By getting out of Korpisalo's contract. Assumption was it was gonna need to be bought out, or this price paid to dump it.
And an extension is obviously still aThese days 2 to 3 million for a backup is a reasonable price. His contract isnt that bad. If korpi plays 25 games and holds the fort . Excellent trade for a guy who wants to test free agency .By getting out of Korpisalo's contract. Assumption was it was gonna need to be bought out, or this price paid to dump it.
And an extension is obviously still a possibility and something the org will likely push hard for.
I thought Boston would get more. Not that they did not get anything. I guess the 1st is the key
You never know how these things will work out, but at first blush this seems like a slam dunk for Ottawa. Ullmark is an excellent goalie, and Korpisalo was godawful last season every time I saw him.
Needed goaltending, and you got it.
If korpi finds that mojo that he had with Columbus this might be a landslide victory for bruins especially with our solid goaltending coaching team who did wonders for linus. The 1st round pick might become a player and kastelic might be quite useful in the 4th line. Heard hes a tough kid. If linus leaves after a year in Ottawa it's a no brainer.@The don godfather
Sure, the cost of a backup is getting higher, but the problem is his stats haven't backed that up. He's been poor by backup standards for 3 of the last 4 seasons, so saying he can "hold the fort" is just hollow words to an Ottawa fan. I hope the best for him, seems like a good guy, but there's no argument that he wasn't a negative asset that we wanted to punt for free if possible. Whatever he is to Boston is between Boston and him, but we wanted/needed him gone and Staios apparently did too as he said priority 1 was upgrade goaltending. His salary also stood in the way of that addition, theoretically, so it made a lot of sense.
He has had an average to below average career in general. To me, him being a positive contributor, at his salary, is something he needs to prove next year and is by no means a sure bet.
What "mojo" did he have in Columbus? The guy has arguably been "good" in 3 of his 9 seasons in the league. The rest were bad or average at best.If korpi finds that mojo that he had with Columbus this might be a landslide victory for bruins especially with our solid goaltending coaching team who did wonders for linus. The 1st round pick might become a player and kastelic might be quite useful in the 4th line. Heard hes a tough kid. If linus leaves after a year it's a no brainer.
If korpi finds that mojo that he had with Columbus this might be a landslide victory for bruins especially with our solid goaltending coaching team who did wonders for linus. The 1st round pick might become a player and kastelic might be quite useful in the 4th line. Heard hes a tough kid. If linus leaves after a year in Ottawa it's a no brainer.