Oshawa Generals 2024-25 Season Thread, Part 1

Fischhaber

Registered User
Sep 3, 2014
3,275
1,792
Who’s buying the remaining top OAs? How high could prices get in a bidding war between Brampton and Kingston for Allard, Misajelic, and Swick?
We saw Peer go for 2,3,3,4,11 last year. That could be a solid comp for Misaljevic.

We saw Morrison go for 2,2,3,3,4,4 in the year before that. It's probably the best recent comp for Allard. Different styles of players, but Allard's WJHC selection is an indication of his more well rounded game.

Of course, early season trades require a premium like we saw with Wakely, so we'll have to see. Sometimes teams wait too long and get very little like we saw with the Generals great trade for Punnett last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: East Avenue Bully

frontsfan67

Registered User
Dec 3, 2022
2,997
1,716
Gonna be a hell of a third
Wow
IMG_4680.jpeg
 

Generalsupdates

@GeneralsUpdates on Twitter
Sep 4, 2017
7,557
4,751
Impressive 3rd period and OT to pick up another big 2 points for 5 in a row and 8 of their last 9 now. With their 2 best players back in the lineup, that's no longer a bad Petes team and they looked to have the game in hand before the Gens dominated them 16-5 in shots in the 3rd and then outchanced them like 5-0 in OT. That must be as good a PP that went 0/6 has looked, as 5 of the 6 PPs the Gens had 2/3 great chances. Barlow was beside himself a couple times with open nets on on timers and Bowen either robbed him or he missed the net. That PP is fun to watch the way they can swing the puck around.

The Ritchie assist on the Buckley goal was disgusting.

Also hilarious how bad the Gens were in the shootout last year and now suddenly they're 4/4 shooting and Gravelle has stopped 4/5 for a 2-0 record in their 2 shootouts. He was very solid tonight and looked like the 2nd round goalie they expected him to be when they drafted him there
 

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,189
697
Toronto, ON.
Anyone who would still rather have Delisle and Bedkowski over Barlow on this roster is insane to me.

Losing Bedkowski sucks but you gotta give up young talent to get established talent, art of the deal.

Delisle was in the role that Griffin is in now after the deal and I would take Griffin over Delisle most days.

Barlow had a slow start but that is more than fine. If he stays at a point per game going forward, that's more than either player would've produced year long, probably combined.
Despite no points tonight in Ptbo, I think I lost count of how many grade A scoring chances he had tonight, and just couldn’t finish. He’s getting a lot of opportunities and they’re going to start going in in bunches imo. Can tell he’s forcing it a bit right now but doing some good things away from the puck and still generating lots of chances. Great play by Ritchie on the tying goal, what a play to beat the D and then send it back to Buckley. Ptbo is not as bad as their record indicates, they play hard and Bowen has been a thorn in oshawa’s side so far this season, keeping games close when they probably shouldn’t be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Generalsupdates

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,189
697
Toronto, ON.
Exactly nobody’s going to know for about 2-3 years.

If Oshawa wins the championship gotta say a championship surely wins the trade. If they don’t win and choke in the second round for instance then they gave up 2 future great OHL players and a bunch of picks for nothing.

Naming a winner of the trade in November makes absolutely 0 sense

Also about Owen Sounds draft picks what if 2 of those guys they get from draft picks in the 2nd/3rd end up being NHL guys? Lots of things to consider.
You don’t really evaluate trades like that imo. End of the day it was a good hockey trade for both teams, and whether oshawa wins it all or not doesn’t negate the importance of making the trade either way. Barlow is the best player of the 3, and it’s not particularly close. His role
On the team plus his leadership qualities are enough to make the trade worth it. Every team can sit there and say we shouldn’t have made so and so trade because we didn’t win, but you got a full year of Barlow and a successful 68 game is not nothing imo. Plus Oshawa has a solid enough core for next year to remain competitive while being able to move some big pieces to ensure they can go for it again in 2-3 seasons. Bedkowski is a solid player but he’d be no more than 3rd pair for oshawa this season. Was it pointless for north bay last year to trade Kostuch and a bunch of picks for Vilmanis, despite losing in the conference finals? Not in my eyes. Same with the Soo going out and getting Hayes and Frasca. I’d rather have a gm and team who goes for it and is aggressive than someone who’s too conservative and afraid of losing a trade, and end up being mediocre year in year out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Generalsupdates

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,189
697
Toronto, ON.
Maybe someone can back me up on this to save me the time from scrolling back to the comment regarding Brady Smith and them making a commitment to keeping him? Anyone?

It will really come down to the level of player that the Generals are targeting. As of right now, the Generals have two distant 2nds and two distant 3rds plus a lot of 4ths. Plus they have Smith. I don’t think they can afford to move Griffin but there is a possibility depending on the package where they could move him I guess.

Here is where the Barlow trade value comes into play significantly. If the Barlow trade value is accurate and on point for market value, then the assets Oshawa has to trade are relatively meaningless. To get one more comparable player to Barlow, it would literally need to include Brady Smith plus the two 2nds and one 3rd (comparable to the Taylor plus picks for Owen Beck last year). So, IMO, Oshawa cannot fill three holes and get another impact player back IF IF IF the true market value for Barlow was accurate and not an overpay. If the Generals are able to get Konnor Smith, Andonvovski and Cooper Foster or some sort of similar group of players then the prices will have to be relatively cheaper at the deadline than the comparable for Barlow early. That has and will continue to be my point.

Effectively speaking, if the Barlow deal was a good deal and fair market value, how on Earth can the Generals fans think for a second that they can get more than one more impactful player? They may be able to get that one impactful player but the remainder of the players will be depth players at best. The only way they can get multiple impact players is if the market folds in and the players are available cheap which by definition makes the Barlow trade an overpay.
They don’t need to go and get another high end player, they’re already loaded with high end talent. What they need is some depth pieces to fill out the top 9 and the 4-6 D spots. Maybe a 2nd line C which would allow Sinivuori to go back to his natural place on the wing, although he’s been great playing up the middle and is a key player already. A Cooper Foster/Charlie Paquette/Alex Pharand/Chase Coughlan/Joey Willis level player would be ideal imo. Marrelli, Danford, Sandhu is a great top 3 I think, and Svozil/D’amato are good 5-6 guys, but D’amato might be upgraded on. I do expect them to acquire a D at some point that pushes Svozil to the bottom pair, where he’ll have success. Bedkowski would be struggling to play top 4 minutes here I think, it’s nice to have LH-RH on the top 2 pairs.
 

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,189
697
Toronto, ON.
There's also others out there that could help fill depth that we aren't thinking of. No suspected Sandhu last year and he is now playing regularly playing in the 1st line D every night. Time will tell. There is a lot out there defensively that is better than Rodeiguez as a regular starter as well.
If you actually went through all the teams D last year near the deadline, it became apparent Sandhu was one of the only ones who fit the B profile. Left shot and an 05, there was nobody but him who made sense. I remember talking with gensupdates ahout a potential Sandhu deal a week or so before it happened.
 

hockeyisbest

Registered User
Oct 1, 2024
45
38
They don’t need to go and get another high end player, they’re already loaded with high end talent. What they need is some depth pieces to fill out the top 9 and the 4-6 D spots. Maybe a 2nd line C which would allow Sinivuori to go back to his natural place on the wing, although he’s been great playing up the middle and is a key player already. A Cooper Foster/Charlie Paquette/Alex Pharand/Chase Coughlan/Joey Willis level player would be ideal imo. Marrelli, Danford, Sandhu is a great top 3 I think, and Svozil/D’amato are good 5-6 guys, but D’amato might be upgraded on. I do expect them to acquire a D at some point that pushes Svozil to the bottom pair, where he’ll have success. Bedkowski would be struggling to play top 4 minutes here I think, it’s nice to have LH-RH on the top 2 pairs.
Barlow just isn’t producing, but the win last night is a win. But that was a tough win against the last place team.
I disagree with Bedkowski evaluation, you don’t get a B rating from the scouts for nothing, now I sound like the generalsupdate Guy, quoting statistics, you have an owner that’s just so hell-bent on winning the memorial cup. He’s trying to stack the team with nothing but snipers and it isn’t quite working out, the team has plenty of great players that can put the puck in the net, they just need to pass more.

Defence is lacking this season, but Marelli is shining beautifully. Svozil is soft and D’Amato is probably not playing with his heart in the game, sensing being traded.

I’d say there’s a little bit of friction amongst the players, the top guys are not particularly keen on Barlow.
 

Nerf27

Registered User
Oct 15, 2012
590
253
Barlow just isn’t producing, but the win last night is a win. But that was a tough win against the last place team.
I disagree with Bedkowski evaluation, you don’t get a B rating from the scouts for nothing, now I sound like the generalsupdate Guy, quoting statistics, you have an owner that’s just so hell-bent on winning the memorial cup. He’s trying to stack the team with nothing but snipers and it isn’t quite working out, the team has plenty of great players that can put the puck in the net, they just need to pass more.

Defence is lacking this season, but Marelli is shining beautifully. Svozil is soft and D’Amato is probably not playing with his heart in the game, sensing being traded.

I’d say there’s a little bit of friction amongst the players, the top guys are not particularly keen on Barlow.
So you are in the room? Quit trying to start some nonsense rumour. The team is on a 5 game winning streak and have bolted from the bottom. They have a top 6 that some teams would kill for. If you expect them to beat Peterborough by a touchdown each time they play then you’re watching the wrong sport. The Pete’s are a very very young team but they play hard. The Gens had opportunities all night but either missed or Bowen made a great stop. That happens in hockey. How about cudos for coming back down 2 in the third and not folding? So let me guess you’re only happy if they blow every team out and never lose. I agree that they need to shore up some D mistakes and better the PK. We are what 15 16 games in. What do you expect from D’Mato? I’m curious. Sky is not falling because they went to a shoot out and won. Good teams find ways to win. Personally I like an owner and GM that is hell bent on winning lol. What a novel concept? Wonder if the Hunters are hell bent on winning. PS the owner does not make the trades. They have one of the best GMs in the league doing that.
 

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,189
697
Toronto, ON.
Barlow just isn’t producing, but the win last night is a win. But that was a tough win against the last place team.
I disagree with Bedkowski evaluation, you don’t get a B rating from the scouts for nothing, now I sound like the generalsupdate Guy, quoting statistics, you have an owner that’s just so hell-bent on winning the memorial cup. He’s trying to stack the team with nothing but snipers and it isn’t quite working out, the team has plenty of great players that can put the puck in the net, they just need to pass more.

Defence is lacking this season, but Marelli is shining beautifully. Svozil is soft and D’Amato is probably not playing with his heart in the game, sensing being traded.

I’d say there’s a little bit of friction amongst the players, the top guys are not particularly keen on Barlow.
Bedkowski’s rating is based on pure long term projection imo, not what he is today. He has lots of runway as a prospect and I do like him, don’t get me wrong. But he’s not better than Danford/Marrelli/Sandhu, and because I think it’s vital to have LH-RH in your top 4, he’s the odd one out. Biggest area they miss him is on the PK. I agree Svozil is soft, but he moves the puck pretty well and is poised under pressure, and he’s in a new country. I like him as a 4-6 guy. That’s wrong though, the top guys love Barlow. Ritchie and Sennecke are very close with him. His production isn’t elite right now but he’s getting a ton of chances, and oshawa has good scoring depth. Elite talent plus good depth scoring in Buckley, Torrance and griffin, the best offensive D in the East and the best shutdown D in the east, why exactly do they need more high end pieces?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nerf27

yessir29292

Registered User
Dec 11, 2021
247
145
As will Marrelli
You think Marrelli, Danford and Sennecke are back next year? I’d bet Danford is, not the other two though.

If all are expected back might as well trade Ritchie, Barlow, Oster, Buckley, Torrance and go for it next year. If Sennecke is in this league next year he will be one of the most dominant junior players ever.
 

HUSH10

Registered User
Sep 16, 2019
1,077
623
You think Marrelli, Danford and Sennecke are back next year? I’d bet Danford is, not the other two though.

If all are expected back might as well trade Ritchie, Barlow, Oster, Buckley, Torrance and go for it next year. If Sennecke is in this league next year he will be one of the most dominant junior players ever.
I forgot Marrelli late birthday and he's actually in the same boat as Ritchie and won't be back next year.

Danford will be back and I think Sennecke has a chance to make Anaheim but time will tell on him.

He may start with Anaheim and see how his first 9 goes, Similar to Ritchie.
 

SoupNazi

Gee Wally/SoupNazi 2024
Feb 6, 2010
27,044
17,124
I don't want to be here. You don't want me here, because it won't go well for any of you.

KNOCK IT OFF.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: MJ5

backwoods

Registered User
May 5, 2024
8
2
SHWA
Good game last nite.. not a big fan of him splitting up the lines. I thought when he separated Ritchie and sennecke they had more depth with two solid scoring lines.
 

ScoutLife4

Registered User
Nov 28, 2023
776
920
About 7:25 Friday!
Kid can chuck em i will give him that.
Last night it looked like he was about to lose his first fight until he threw that bomb that landed.
Didn't look like the Kitchener player wanted to give him time to think about fighting at the start.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad