Herby
How could Blake have known?
Hindsight GMing yet on an extremely incomplete season.
The plan was sound based on the info we had at the time and if you recall there was no certainty on what the NCAA was even doing. Turcotte was hurt at the WJC, not because he got rushed to the pros. K'Andre Miller is doing fine with the Rangers, it's not like Turcotte was the only one exiting. "Blaming" a GM for a season at the quarterpole is a little premature to say the least, and calling it a terrible development path...I mean, can I have your crystal ball on this one?
Yeah the Reign are in the mud right now but you've reached a lot of conclusions on incomplete info and they all are worst-case scenarios. I'm not thrilled with the current situation but I have to believe they've got nowhere to go but up and that the Kings will actually give them the reinforcements instead of just sitting on them.
It's not hindsighting, we had this very argument at the time of the signing, so how is it hindsighting? There were plenty of concerns, many expressed on this very board about whether it was a good move to have a 19 year old who didn't exactly set the world on fire as a freshman to be promoted to pro hockey before he was ready. There have been examples of others who have been signed prematurely and it hindered their development (Casey Mittlestadt). You (ofcourse) loved the signing, but who has had a more positive development this year Caufield and Holloway or Turcotte? If you had it to do over again would you still be championing the signing? And based on what historical precedent? Ryan Kesler 17 years ago?
I never said he was injured because he was playing pro hockey, he could have been injured practicing, my comments have nothing to do with his injury and everything to do with the fact that the vast majority of the successful NCAA players currently in the NHL play atleast two years, and the ones that don't usually dominate as NCAA freshman and then immediately step into NHL lineups (Eichel, Connor, Keller, Larkin, Tkachuk) as very good NHL players. I follow college closely, I can't think of a single player who has left college after an 18 year old season, played an entire season in the AHL and then been an impact NHL'er. And that was the Kings "sound plan" for the highest draft pick they had in a decade?
And yes, thank you for citing Miller, Miller played two years, two years should be the norm unless you are ready to step in and play in the NHL right away, which clearly wasn't going to ever be the case with this player. Had Miller left after his freshman season it's very likely he would not be the player he has been so far. Holloway and Caufield will both likely be gone after this season, with a year of dominating hockey for a very good team under a former NHL coach, heck they might even win a national championship. All those things are important for the development of a player you expect to eventually dominate at the NHL level. Playing another year at Wisconsin and being a dominating player at the NCAA level would have been the best thing for his development, it's common sense, not hindsight.
Last edited: