IMO above beyond the revenge factor the PA want assurance this does happen again. In other words NHL want are YOU going do to be sure we aren't concessing again 6 years and then again in 6 more years?
Ok, then negotiate a 10 year CBA. Negotiate SOMETHING that indicates what you actually want.
If the NHLPA had tabled 3 offers to the NHL's 3 offers, I would still be on their side as I was at the beginning of all this.
Also, so the owners imposed a system. It didn't work like they said it would. They have a right to try to negotiate a system that works for them, no?
And yes, it is a tweak. Let me show you a really ridiculous offer:
Salary cap not directly linked to revenues or 57% HRR for owners, no cap floor, end to guaranteed contracts, higher age for UFA, lower rookie contracts, different definition of HRR to give players less pie of the smaller share.
This is essentially the NFL CBA (except the UFA and cap floor, their PA won that back). And the NFL is the way it is because their PA has never had the will to ask for more. They couldn't even get guaranteed contracts in last year's lockout!
Instead the NHL is negotiating a share of HRR that will be around 50/50, a definition of HRR that foregoes their ability to make the pie smaller, and a maximum length to UFA contracts so the richer teams can't circumvent the rules to sign their stars. To me that is more than reasonable.
Right now the NHLPA being willing to waste a season is essentially a stupidity tax they're charging themselves.