Ongoing Powerplay Discussion

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
I want to highlight a problem I see that's also causing a lot of the frustration with Robertson.

This is about zone entries and how other teams have pre-scouted the Stars. Bear with my crude drawings plz

diagram1.jpg


So a lot of the time this is Stankoven, or Duchene, or Johnston as the puck carrier. Which is fine for the most part. But then they usually opt to drop to Robertson on the wall who has just entered the zone. Wouldn't normally be a problem but other teams know that this is the Stars' vulnerability.

diagram2.jpg


Typically he gets double-teamed with extreme PK aggressiveness and is either slow to move the puck or is just looking for Miro trying to dance along the line with limited space. He can't or won't move his feet which eliminates the possibility that he might spin back down the boards and punish that aggressiveness by making a play down low.

I'm not sure what the solution is other than hiding him initially on the weak side that the puck carrier isn't going to and only bringing him into the play once possession is established. But there needs to be an adjustment.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
The funny thing is injury/availability/sickness actually eventually forced them into what I think are better personnel

Bourque and Nils should be regular parts of the PP in some capacity.... that's why you acquired the players in the first place (and then steadfastly refused to use their strengths)
 

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
49,238
17,100
South of Heaven
The funny thing is injury/availability/sickness actually eventually forced them into what I think are better personnel

Bourque and Nils should be regular parts of the PP in some capacity.... that's why you acquired the players in the first place (and then steadfastly refused to use their strengths)
But you know next game they're going right back to the same five playing the first 1:20 of each PP.

Benn, Robertson, and Miro need to be demoted from the PP. They're giving the team nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: starsfan86

Smelling Salt

Busey is life
Mar 8, 2006
7,287
3,717
Winnipeg
Yes, remove Miro and Robo at minimum. Insert Harley and Duchene. Remove Benn and put Wyatt on there and keep him there.

And send Spott packing in the shittiest cab possible.
 

Satan

MIGHTY
Apr 13, 2010
92,399
14,613
Lapland
in the victory green era (12 seasons, we're old now) the 2024-25 powerplay ranks..


11 of 12 in GF/60
7 of 12 in SF/60
1 of 12 in CF/60
4 of 12 in FF/60
3 of 12 in xGF/60
11 of 12 in Shooting Percentage



 
  • Like
Reactions: Zapp

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
49,238
17,100
South of Heaven
in the victory green era (12 seasons, we're old now) the 2024-25 powerplay ranks..


11 of 12 in GF/60
7 of 12 in SF/60
1 of 12 in CF/60
4 of 12 in FF/60
3 of 12 in xGF/60
11 of 12 in Shooting Percentage
Ah, I see what you’re saying. This is an unusually bad slump, which means they are due, so don’t change anything.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
Part of the systemic problem is I think internally they have so little confidence in their ability to break into the zone with possession that they consider the opening faceoff taken by Benn to be the most important act of the entire PP. So all of the decisions flow backwards from that starting assumption that Benn must take the faceoff. So you end up with a player who wasn't even good at the powerplay at his absolute prime on your first unit, sometimes for 90 seconds.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
Surprised David's article wasn't posted yet

Lots of great information and charts but one of the biggest conclusions here is noting that some of the top powerplays in the league are adaptable. The Stars are not. They run their heads into the wall over and over with the 1-3-1 umbrella without ever morphing into different looks that could confuse or cause hesitation for the PKers.

There are three prongs of futility here:

1) Personnel selection
2) Formation/system
3) Player execution
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johno

Zapp

Owner of Fellas Club
Mar 14, 2016
5,117
4,758
Jyvaskyla
Surprised David's article wasn't posted yet

Lots of great information and charts but one of the biggest conclusions here is noting that some of the top powerplays in the league are adaptable. The Stars are not. They run their heads into the wall over and over with the 1-3-1 umbrella without ever morphing into different looks that could confuse or cause hesitation for the PKers.

There are three prongs of futility here:

1) Personnel selection
2) Formation/system
3) Player execution

well 1-3-1 is the only option for this team. you need a pretty solid RHD to run the spread and they don't have the wheels to run an overload. Hence why you've seen them only run 1-3-1 since Klingberg left. You cant just swap Miro over there either, it puts him at a disadvantage keeping pucks inside the zone off the boards. He has to catch it backhand and pull it over to his strong side in which that time a PK'er would already be all over him.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
With tonight's performance we fell to 29th in Net % barely fending off fellow Stanley Cup Contender Anaheim

net.JPG
 

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
49,238
17,100
South of Heaven
With tonight's performance we fell to 29th in Net % barely fending off fellow Stanley Cup Contender Anaheim

View attachment 950796
If you want some fun, go to the NHL stats page, pull up the PP report, and sort by PP ice time per game. Then look over at the PP points/60 column to see how Miro is top 20 in ice time and something like 300+ in actual production. The other guys up high in PP ice time (even the defensemen) are generating several times over the amount of PP offense.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
Yep, because their only response to struggling is to play one of the guys who makes you struggle even more.

If you scrambled their names/numbers there's no way a neutral observer would actually pick Miro to run it.
 

redbeardtx

Unregistered User
Apr 7, 2014
3,273
2,036
Dallas, TX
I think in an attempt to fix the PP and save Spott's job, we'll probably just trade for Kreider to try and replace Pavelski's deflection skill in front of the net. If they're not gonna change the strategy, they're going to have to find someone who fits it instead
 

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
49,238
17,100
South of Heaven
I think in an attempt to fix the PP and save Spott's job, we'll probably just trade for Kreider to try and replace Pavelski's deflection skill in front of the net. If they're not gonna change the strategy, they're going to have to find someone who fits it instead
But the only way to get him on PP1 is to trade one of the guys on that unit. Otherwise, Krieder won't get a chance on PP1 until training camp in September. Sorry. Those are the rules. I think it's in the CBA.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,335
4,321
It'll be interesting to watch Team Finland's effectiveness since they don't have any other options.

Although now that I"m thinking about it I'd probably have Granlund or Aho run the point :laugh:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad