He doesn't stink at fighting so much as Olivier is the 1 guy that really decisively kicked his butt. Besides, Rempe has been playing great, really making a difference. Best to stick to the shit stirrer role combined with good basic hockey offense. The fighting should only be in response to threats to Igor or as an enforcer paying back dirty hits on our guys. No gratuitous fighting if only because we cant afford the penalty minutes.I have no interest in seeing Rempe get destroyed again. He stinks at fighting. How is that not obvious?
There was no good reason to play Kreider today. The optics of activating him a day after the trade deadline aside, he had two practices maybe? Why not give him a few more practices first? What was the rush?
There's no margin for error to be playing the "reserved roster spot" caste system favoritism. Today should be proof that Kreider should be a spare emergency forward.Lavi is going to Lavi.
The optics are horrible but anyone questioning if he was actually hurt is an idiot. Today's game was a massive swing game, but it's not like the games over the last 2 weeks haven't been important.
Not in Rangerland -- he'll be back on the top line before you know it.There's no margin for error to be playing the "reserved roster spot" caste system favoritism. Today should be proof that Kreider should be a spare emergency forward.
There's no margin for error to be playing the "reserved roster spot" caste system favoritism. Today should be proof that Kreider should be a spare emergency forward.
Imagine if he fired Lavi and the whole staff and made himself interim head coach for Game 1?
Good point. The amount of “poor Igor the team let him down” I saw after the loss made my head hurt. Did these people stop watching the game after the second period? Igor’s team gave him a 2 goal lead in the third period and he gave up a shit tying goal and a worse OT losing goal. Are we not allowed to expect this guy close out a game? Not give up a goal right after we score one? Not leak out multiple shit rebounds to gift the Sens the tying goal? Stop a clear sight shot from the top of the circle in OT? No, poor Igor it’s definitely never his fault!Our backup goalie played today.
Good point. The amount of “poor Igor the team let him down” I saw after the loss made my head hurt. Did these people stop watching the game after the second period? Igor’s team gave him a 2 goal lead in the third period and he gave up a shit tying goal and a worse OT losing goal. Are we not allowed to expect this guy close out a game? Not give up a goal right after we score one? Not leak out multiple shit rebounds to gift the Sens the tying goal? Stop a clear sight shot from the top of the circle in OT? No, poor Igor it’s definitely never his fault!
The "poor Igor" takes are the new "if only David Jones had an O-line" takes. At some point if it's everyone else's fault. It's your f***ing fault.
I will only fault the goalie if the team is playing WELL in front of him and he's letting the team down with legit soft goals. The problem is you think 11.5 should mean automatic wins no matter how bad the team plays in front of him. Every, single, goal is going to be cried about by you no matter how shitty the defense is, how much the offensive can't score, how horrid the PP is, and how well the opposing team is. I'm NOT going to blame the goalie for being paid what he wanted. Truthfully, the team could've walked away from him and Igor would've made that money anywhere else in the league. A goalie having to steal games should be the exception for this team.
You also keep mentioning an average goalie would've did this and that. We did have an average goalie in Geo. So did the f***ing Avs and they were scoring out of their minds last season, but an average goalie was doing what average goalies do.
So what? You wanted him to take like 8.5 or something?? Because that 3 mil left over would've gotten us someone to push us right to the cup, right?
The data and facts are right there and fans still ignore them so they can just bitch, bitch, bitch. The lack of defense and the shots against is unsustainable to win games long term. Igor got us the wins we got in the playoffs even with us being the 3rd worst team in shots against. No one within the top five, six, seven, or eight in that stat was even close to wins.
I'm hoping one day we do land an average goalie so I can hear the same people bitch about the same goalie shit for another goalie generation. As if he didn't hear it enough with Hank.
We have an average goalie right now. Problem is that we are paying said goalie 11.5 mil.I'm hoping one day we do land an average goalie so I can hear the same people bitch about the same goalie shit for another goalie generation. As if he didn't hear it enough with Hank.
We have an average goalie right now. Problem is that we are paying said goalie 11.5 mil.
I'm not here to defend Lavi, but this is on the players. Good teams execute. Execution is more important than any system, which, by and large, are all very similar. Is it Lavi's fault that we don't have guys who are willing to go hard to the net? Forecheck? Execute a basic pass?Again, the same issues that led to Laviolette being fired in Washington are the same exact issues arising here. This shouldn’t be surprising to anyone, especially when they watch this team play hockey. Yes, part of the blame is on the players, but it’s also the structure within which they’re asked to play.
There’s just absolutely zero creativity on offense, and they’re genuinely one of the easiest teams to defend against at 5v5. The perimeter cycling and low-percentage point shots aren’t scaring anyone, especially when they dont make any effort to move bodies between the circles. Laviolette can talk all he wants about having the defensemen push the pace and playing downhill, but it’s all just lip service.
When you’re that easy to defend against, it’s easier for the other team to break out in transition and outnumber you through the neutral zone. I’d ask the Rangers if they know what that means, but this organization hasn’t cared about or tried defending off the rush since 2014-15. Constantly losing transition battles leads to sustained shifts against in the d-zone and possession against you. That leads to chipping out the puck and changing rather than getting a chance to forecheck and win loose puck battles.
It’s just another year of a subpar 5v5 Rangers team relying on goaltending and special teams. We all know how this story ends.
I think Drury's plan is to get bigger and harder to play against. It was no secret that we were the easiest team in the league to play against, which is why it was mind boggling that Rempe wasn't kept in the line up. Instead, we inserted a bunch of AHL'ers with zero impact on the game.There's no plan here. They only got Miller because he wanted to come here and Vancouver needed him gone. Don't buy the BS about changing the culture. How are they changing the culture when all the super comfortable loser veterans are still there?
You mean by scoring 7 goals when Igor gave up 6? Not sure.Has there been even one game where the team bailed Igor out? Maybe but I can't remember.