Oliver Ekman-Larsson has been fined $5,000

SmoggyTwinkles

Go Leafs Go
Aug 5, 2010
7,236
3,957
Oshawa
www.bing.com
""


""



Say what now?

I'm going to have to put away my Leafs bias here because those are two different plays.

OEL I'm not seeing a puck, Pasta/JT therer is a puck that Pasta gets to first, and JT protects his head with his forearm.

A fine seems fair.
 

barilko05

People...they're the worst!
Jan 28, 2011
1,167
922
I'm going to have to put away my Leafs bias here because those are two different plays.

OEL I'm not seeing a puck, Pasta/JT therer is a puck that Pasta gets to first, and JT protects his head with his forearm.

A fine seems fair.
Where are you not seeing it? Its right at OEL's feet along the boards. Comes out right as he's laying the (clean) check.
 

SmoggyTwinkles

Go Leafs Go
Aug 5, 2010
7,236
3,957
Oshawa
www.bing.com
It's sad how accustomed I am to DOPS inconsistency and the Leafs.
Yeah, but let's give Parros a bit of leaway here you know?

I mean I of all people, you know, random internet poster somehow missed seeing the puck in a grainy twitter post,

Maybe Parros did too! Surely he wouldn't have taken the time to watch a higher quality recording and maybe even get opinions from the people he works with?

Oh wait, that's his job and he gets paid (probably more than the majority of us make) to do that job professionaly?
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,147
15,879
Lol. DOPS somehow manages to be as unpredictable as possible, yet still so predictably bad when it comes to the Leafs.
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,376
11,984
Fine makes sense, consistency of application is an ongoing issue. That Jeffler tweet is pretty spot on
 

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,797
18,488
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
I've no issue with that being something that draws supplementary discipline. Dangerous play and made no attempt on the puck while Guentzel never touched it or had possession. That is a play I'm fine with getting rid of.

The issue for me is consistency. I want you to pick up all of this type of stuff, but they won't. They'll pick and choose, and if you're a star, you will get more leniency. I don't get why they can't just be more consistent and/or have more of a structure to their offenses and how they escalate.

They have to ban the reverse hit then.

It is interference if the player doesn't have the puck and it happens frequently.

Consistency? They are consistently punishing the Leafs. So there's that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Da Cool Rula

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
5,908
5,296
I don't like it. I don't want OEL to stop being nasty/aggressive/feisty. We go a long time without any leaf pushing the boundaries, and now they come down on the 1st one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Da Cool Rula

Matthews4Calder

Registered User
Nov 27, 2016
527
370
BC Western Canada
I was shocked at this. Really. Leagues a joke plain and simple. Also the max fine meanwhile Arber Jackass got less for punching an unwilling combatant in the head multiple times.

 
  • Like
Reactions: OddyOh

mcleex

Fire Parros
Jul 3, 2009
11,713
6,144
I literally wouldn't mind seeing Parros get TKO'd
Dudes the biggest scumbag next to Marchand
 

Blanka

Registered User
Mar 27, 2013
1,416
1,333
Thought I'd go into /r/hockey and see what others are saying about the fine. Quickly remembered why I never use Reddit anyone
 

LeafEgo

Registered User
Oct 8, 2021
975
848
That's fine, it's an immaterial donation for him to a local charity. Goes to the player emergency fund to support either him or fellow colleagues at a later date.

It's the Jackeye rabbit punch that wasn't proportional 'punishment'.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad