He gave up more than 3 goals twice against Dallas and Florida (keeping in mind too that the league is higher scoring now).1 great playoff series in his life. Even with that he still has historically bad playoffs numbers.
Considering how good our team is… yes I think a lot of goalies would be able to match that. Pickard was in the AHL for half a decade + and performs just as well… if not better than Skinner.
These were his goals against in those two series...
2
2
4
2
1
1
2
3
4
1
3
1
2
Lots of 1s and 2s so, again, more hyperbole to how bad Skinner has been.
His first playoffs were bad, he was a rookie, 2nd playoffs got much stronger as the playoffs wore on and was key in both the Dallas and Florida series.
Goalies are voodoo, there's lots of fluctuations in play generally. Oettinger was terrible 2 years ago in the playoffs, got outdueled last playoffs against Skinner, Saros wasn't great against Vancouver, Helleybuck got lit up in two straight playoffs despite being a god in the regular season.
I'm not saying Skinner is on the level of those guys obviously, just saying that goalies are fickle and that using small sample sizes to judge a goalie (in this case, all the folks calling him an AHL goalie, NHL backup) isn't a proper way to evaluate a goalie.
Long story short. Yes Skinner has flaws, yes Skinner is slow laterally, yes Skinner is having a poor season (I called him out in the GDT last night) yes Skinner had a poor playoffs showing in his first season but, no, Skinner is not an NHL backup, no Skinner is not an AHL goalie, no there aren't 50+ goalies that are upgrades on Skinner.