The #6 spot is an interesting one. I like Emberson and I know there's always the size argument, but can anyone actually argue Stecher hasn't been far more effective of recent?
Plus for all of Stecher's size concerns, his actual playoff statline is damn fine: 21GP, 4-3-7, +13. Hell, we saw it back in 2022, when he was one of LA's more effective defeceman against the Oil. Imo this is one of those don't look at the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog situations.
Even Klingberg I could see surprising. I thought he held his head above water during his first 10 games here while playing mostly 2nd pairing minutes with Nurse all things considered. Give him another few months of practice to continue shaking off the rust and building his strength, and I could see him doing very well in a #6 role. Though with Walman here, he's not as needed.
Imo Emberson is the play if you just want safe, neutral minutes, Klingberg has the most upside to drive the play, and Stecher's the guy if you want someone to help set the tone for the team. Personally I'd with Stecher to start.
Though if I'm allowed to go full mad scientist, I'd go back to Nurse-Kulak, which I still think is more steady than Nurse-Walman, and play Walman-Klingberg on an offensive 3rd pairing, or have the Swedes together...
Ekholm-Bouchard
Nurse-Kulak
Walman-Klingberg
Nurse-Kulak
Walman-Bouchard
Ekholm-Klingberg
Pesonally I really like the latter. We've seen Nurse-Kulak and Walman-Bouchard put up decent fancies in tough minutes, and you'd have your shakiest defender your biggest rock.