- Dec 16, 2019
- 3,691
- 3,605
The voting for Jack Adams often tells the same story. Take a team that was bad the year before and showed the most improvement and there is your probable Jack Adams winner. So...Rick Tocchet, if the Canucks maintain pace.I mean by that logic there are no Jack Adams contenders currently.
They didn't look THAT bad honestly, I think about half the games they looked disinterested and the other half they were snake-bitten. They were playing .500 hockey but nothing was going their way. I think 6/12 of those first 12 games they were putting up 40+ shots and had pretty good underlying analytics (like too 5'ish) but nothing was going right. Combine that with shaky goaltending, a system change that wasn't working, and you have a lot of games lost.He's the new Woodcroft lol. Can we compare the stats of their red hot coaching starts?
If McDavid wasn't playing the first part through injury they would've had a better record and Woodcroft would still be their coach.
A bit alarming how terrible their team looked for that stretch. Good teams can withstand injuries to their top player for short to medium term.
See usually you'd fire the assistants when your coach has done what Jay has the last 2, I guess in the end its worked out well so far but I am curious about a coach like Woodcroft and his next team.Bringing in Paul coffee has also helped.
Not entirely true.Feels like there’s a thread like this everytime they hire a new coach.
Here’s a thread saying how awesome Woodcroft is until he’s not
Woodcraft for Jack Adams?
Saw some crazy stat that for over 100 games he has #2 win percentage of all time. When he arrived last year Oilers were out of playoff spot, took them to Western Finals and again this year posting a great record. Should he be a nominee at all? Hard to vote against Montgomery but imo Woodcraft...forums.hfboards.com
Woodcroft looked bad because McDavid was injured and playing like crap. Now that he’s on fire again the new coach comes in and looks like s genius.
Lmao, "the coach is awesome until he's not"Feels like there’s a thread like this everytime they hire a new coach.
Here’s a thread saying how awesome Woodcroft is until he’s not
Woodcraft for Jack Adams?
Saw some crazy stat that for over 100 games he has #2 win percentage of all time. When he arrived last year Oilers were out of playoff spot, took them to Western Finals and again this year posting a great record. Should he be a nominee at all? Hard to vote against Montgomery but imo Woodcraft...forums.hfboards.com
Woodcroft looked bad because McDavid was injured and playing like crap. Now that he’s on fire again the new coach comes in and looks like s genius.
Ya, it's a pretty f***ing stupid comment to make.Lmao, "the coach is awesome until he's not"
So basically every coach in the league. More at 6.
He's the new Woodcroft lol. Can we compare the stats of their red hot coaching starts?
If McDavid wasn't playing the first part through injury they would've had a better record and Woodcroft would still be their coach.
A bit alarming how terrible their team looked for that stretch. Good teams can withstand injuries to their top player for short to medium term.
Same with goalies. The recency biased is crazy up there.And he magically forgot how to coach over the summer? My point is every time Edmonton thinks they found "the guy" he ended getting fired less than 2 years later.
He did, he changed the system that made them successful last season and resorted back to the McDrai line while playing the bottom 6 minimal minutes.And he magically forgot how to coach over the summer? My point is every time Edmonton thinks they found "the guy" he ended getting fired less than 2 years later.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the average team goes through 5 coaches in 8 years.Lmao, "the coach is awesome until he's not"
So basically every coach in the league. More at 6.
So we are a team that fires a lot of coaches, thus it's notable that one is doing really well, no?Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the average team goes through 5 coaches in 8 years.
Doesnt swear as much as Boudreau, Then again no one swore as much as BoudreauKris. There it is!
This years Bruce Boudreau.
1. More balanced ice time alignment. Much less reliance on McDavid and Draisaitl to play heavy minutesList 10 points of things Knoblauch changed, because I see very little difference.
It's the goaltending and players getting healthy that's been the difference.
You don’t see one third of the season so far as a significant difference?
Of course it’s significant.
12/37 = 32.5%12/82 = 14%.
Literally less than half of a third of a season. Like a third of a third of a season. Lol.