Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,715
- 33,556
No, because I want Tampa to trade Elliott for him.Would Oilers be interested in Halak?
He has played really well this year, But has had zero scoring support.
I think the Oilers are interested in 90% of the goalies in the league not currently on their roster.Would Oilers be interested in Halak?
He has played really well this year, But has had zero scoring support.
Unless they get Vasi a goalie won't change a damn thing in the grand scheme of things.
I think i heard a rumor ullmark is part of that debrusk-yamo trade but as was kassian but with him in protocol they are also waiting to pull the trigger until once rask is signed.
He seems pretty temperamental too. Don’t know if that’s a great fit. Not to bang the Georgiev drum too much but the sense in NY is that he considers himself a starter and bristles at being relegated to backing up. A guy with a chip on his shoulder and something to prove could work out well for Edmonton. As opposed to a more established guy who maybe doesn’t want to be there, like Ullmark.Hard to see why Ullmark would want to go to Edmonton at this point when he's set in Boston very comfortably until 2025.
Came here to say basically this.He seems pretty temperamental too. Don’t know if that’s a great fit. Not to bang the Georgiev drum too much but the sense in NY is that he considers himself a starter and bristles at being relegated to backing up. A guy with a chip on his shoulder and something to prove could work out well for Edmonton. As opposed to a more established guy who maybe doesn’t want to be there, like Ullmark.
As bad as Edmonton has been of late and how desperate their GM will be to not squander another McDavid season, NYR should demand a second rounder and solid prospect like Savoie for Geo, whom shutdown Edmonton last night with a save % of 0.971.Came here to say basically this.
I'd imagine they could pry Quick from LA, has this year and next year as cap hit, Edmonton doesn't have to commit to him long term and probably would be fairly cheap to acquire him. Definitely an upgrade over Kosk and Smith, but I could be biased as I always have had a soft spot for Quick, love his style of play in net.
Don't think LA would mind trading him after signing Petersen to a 3 year bridge.
Thanks for asking.Bern, any source for Ullmark being unwilling to waive for Edmonton? I know he has a NMC.