I’ll always welcome a devils advocate, and I appreciate you bringing that up because I think on the surface it could provide some type of justification. However I think when it comes to this specific situation, the risk is not to the guys who hired him, or Bowman himself, it’s to every single person in the organization who doesn’t have the luxury of being handed a golden parachute like Aldrich, or returning to their multimillion dollar a year salary running and NHL team within 2 years of being forced to step away.
When the real risk is being forced on those involved with the team and organization rather than the hire themselves, or the ones who made the hire, it becomes a lot different than hiring someone looking for a second chance who’s biggest risk is typically going to be themselves and the people who’ve hired them.
Sure the execs are taking a “risk” by risking the backlash of hiring him with all the controversy, but when you hire someone with a history of covering for an abuser, you send a message to everyone below you that you’re willing to put all of them at risk of being the next “John Doe”. That’s not a risk anyone should be allowed to force onto anyone else, especially when the ones suddenly at risk are people who likely don’t have the luxury of being able to simply just find somewhere else to go.