Proposal: Oilers/Hawks/Canes
- Thread starter Toby Flenderson
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Kamiccolo
Truly wonderful, the mind of a child is.
How do you figure late 1sts? And like I said if they know they can't afford him and he's gone anyways that's a good return
DaveG
Noted Jerk
Bryanbryoil
Pray For Ukraine
- Sep 13, 2004
- 88,581
- 39,893
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
thedoughboy
Registered User
If one of the picks is top 3and the other is top 10 then id do it. I also think panarin is going to be a top 3 lw this season
Bryanbryoil
Pray For Ukraine
- Sep 13, 2004
- 88,581
- 39,893
Hypothetical. We are able to land Berglund for Yak. If we could then I would make that trade. Otherwise I'd really rather not. What would it take as an adder for us to get Lindholm included in the trade?
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
Ok, so Yakupov for Berglund has been made.
Faulk
Lindholm
For
Puljujarvi
Draisaitl
That's probably the ask IMO, not saying either team would do it.
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,729
- 10,469
go4hockey
Registered User
He said mid to late which is what they would be. Chicago is good that will be later pick and add Faulk to the Oilers you don't think that's going to be an early pick do you? Most likely a later pick also. Just a bad offer all around but theCanes would love it.
Roof Daddy
Registered User
- Apr 1, 2008
- 13,239
- 2,466
Ya, I'm not sure the Hawks need to be in this deal. I get that the idea is Panarin becomes too expensive to keep, but I think they'd try to move other salary around.
Is Drai + 1st enough for Faulk? Hard to say, but I doubt the Canes pull the trigger. I'd have a hard time as an Oil fan as well, but would do it.
Klefbom-Larsson; Sekera-Faulk would be one of the better top 4 D groups in the game, locked up for the next 5 years at under 19 mil combined. And we'd still have a 1-2 of McDavid-Nuge down the middle.
Is Drai + 1st enough for Faulk? Hard to say, but I doubt the Canes pull the trigger. I'd have a hard time as an Oil fan as well, but would do it.
Klefbom-Larsson; Sekera-Faulk would be one of the better top 4 D groups in the game, locked up for the next 5 years at under 19 mil combined. And we'd still have a 1-2 of McDavid-Nuge down the middle.
From Carolinas prospective, I would not do this trade. Young stud defenceman are pretty much untouchable...
RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
This is pretty bad, why would Chicago be involved in this? Panarin's RFA rights would return better than two middle 1sts and a bust.
yababy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2015
- 3,444
- 828
RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
Seriously. It's a franchise defining trade if they can pull it off, but they can't. Not like this anyway.
RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
If we're talking Panarin's RFA rights, go look at the Seguin trade and think something similar.
OG
cajun filet
I would add a 4th rounder from Carolina to Chicago, but no more. Not trying to give up too much value here.
RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
Are those 1sts from CAR and EDM unprotected?
Those could be pretty valuable aka both top 5 picks, could easily be a win for Chicago's future.
Those could be pretty valuable aka both top 5 picks, could easily be a win for Chicago's future.
RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
If we're talking two top 5 picks, that'd change things.
But if Edmonton ends up with another top 5 pick in the next decade, something is seriously wrong with that franchise.
Latest posts
-
-
-
NHL met with a group interested in expanding to New Orleans- Latest: VivaLasVegas
-
