Jurivan Demidovsky
#25 in '25
- Nov 26, 2024
- 820
- 1,349
No. But a high scoring tight loss would still be exciting.Who roots for a loss tonight? Are we there yet?
No. But a high scoring tight loss would still be exciting.Who roots for a loss tonight? Are we there yet?
Who roots for a loss tonight? Are we there yet?
Demidov alone changes the whole dynamic of this team.So... Habs have been tanking for 3 years straight now... can anyone honestly say they are close to being a good team than they were 3 years ago? Anyone watching the SJ game? Tank all you want but neither current players, not the pipeline aspire a lot of hope.
Oh man... I so wish, but he so will not. Maybe for a short priod of time. Habs need good vets, and they desperately need a new coach. Watching this team run around with no purpose on the ice, do you think Demidov will make a difference? Sure he is better than anyone not called Suzuki and Caufiled, but it takes a lot more to consistently win. Habs are soft as butter and Demidov won't change that. THey have no system and Demidov won't change that. THey got not 1 and 2 D and Demidov won't change that.Demidov alone changes the whole dynamic of this team.
We need a to aquire another RD like Carrier through trade and hope that one of Reinbacher or Mailloux pans out.Oh man... I so wish, but he so will not. Maybe for a short priod of time. Habs need good vets, and they desperately need a new coach. Watching this team run around with no purpose on the ice, do you think Demidov will make a difference? Sure he is better than anyone not called Suzuki and Caufiled, but it takes a lot more to consistently win. Habs are soft as butter and Demidov won't change that. THey have no system and Demidov won't change that. THey got not 1 and 2 D and Demidov won't change that.
I will trade slafkovsky for such center. A proven center who produced... not Dach or Newhook type center.We need a to aquire another RD like Carrier through trade and hope that one of Reinbacher or Mailloux pans out.
Offensively all we need to acquire is a young veteran 2C preferably who is a left shot. We have the assets necessary to acquire that player.
We know the organization won't trade Slaf and there's no need to trade him. We have excellent draft picks we could use, plus we have a couple interesting prospects we could part ways with. Our 2 x 1st round picks should be in play once we know what position we are drafting at, we would be ripe for a blockbuster trade. Exactly What Bergevin could never pull off, "centers are not available". We should be looking to acquire a name brand player who is in his prime. Then we have a great top 6, and it pushes better players down to the bottom 6 and we improve there too.I will trade slafkovsky for such center. A proven center who produced... not Dach or Newhook type center.
So... Habs have been tanking for 3 years straight now... can anyone honestly say they are close to being a good team than they were 3 years ago? Anyone watching the SJ game? Tank all you want but neither current players, not the pipeline aspire a lot of hope.
Newhook was acquired to play 3rd line role, which will only happen next year after Demigod arrives w Dvorak having already vacated his lineup spotNewhook was a foxhole move. Reeks of Bergevinism.
Transitioning away to what is the questionYeah and these guys will be gone. We’re slowly but surely transitioning away.
Buy out gally this summer. It’s time.We know the organization won't trade Slaf and there's no need to trade him. We have excellent draft picks we could use, plus we have a couple interesting prospects we could part ways with. Our 2 x 1st round picks should be in play once we know what position we are drafting at, we would be ripe for a blockbuster trade. Exactly What Bergevin could never pull off, "centers are not available". We should be looking to acquire a name brand player who is in his prime. Then we have a great top 6, and it pushes better players down to the bottom 6 and we improve there too.
Slaf - Suzuki - Caufield
Laine - x2Cx - Demidov
Heine - Dach - Anderson
Armia - Beck - Gallagher
I mean, even if he was, he still doesn't fit our needsThey thought he was better than he is, with his speed and all.
He isn't.
Pretty simple, they saw an opportunity to get a young player they felt could hit a higher potential getting more opportunities here than down the line-up in Colorado.. and Newhook brought a speed element that was lacking, and still is lacking, in the forward group.
It was a calculated play that even if he didn't hit a top 6 upside, they got cost certainty over a late first and a 2nd round pick, in an already deep pool and well stocked pick cupboard, and we will see the most likely outcome which is Newhook developing into a 3rd liner with speed, so a new age Paul Byron with better finishing ability.
To Demidov, Reinbacher, Beck, Roy, Kapenan, Hage, Fowler, Mailloux... The cupboards are stacked.Transitioning away to what is the question
I mean, even if he was, he still doesn't fit our needs
To Demidov, Reinbacher, Beck, Roy, Kapenan, Hage, Fowler, Mailloux... The cupboards are stacked.
How can you forget Mikhail Grabovski. I still remember his debut against the Rangers. Everybody was so hyped up about the guy.You're preaching to the choir, sir
Reminds me of when we thought the same when we had Komisarek, Perezhogin, Balej, Plekanec, Higgins, etc, etc.
You're preaching to the choir, sir
Reminds me of when we thought the same when we had Komisarek, Perezhogin, Balej, Plekanec, Higgins, etc, etc.