Official Tank Thread

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,829
6,576
Not sure if I'd call Evans shooting at 27% "our young core succeeding". I'd be 100% off team tank if the recent good results came from the likes of Slafkovsky, Dach or Newhook playing at a newfound elite level, but that is just not the case. Aside from Hutson being a bright new spot, every U23 player on the team has either stagnated in their development or even regressed, and yet the team is clawing wins with good goaltending and bottom-6 players suddenly finding a new gear during a contract year. That's not a recipe for success, that's a recipe for disaster.

People overreact all the time when the pendulum swings in either direction, but the underlying numbers have stayed essentially the same during the whole season, and a bottom 5 finish is still the most likely course. Just got to hope that the goalies won't steal too many wins and that the likes of Evans or Armia either cool down or get traded for picks/prospects.
Seems like a strange time to make these claims. Our most recent good result was very much from guys like Dach and Newhook succeeding even though Evans did score again.

And the underlying numbers have changed fairly significantly over the past month and a half. During the first 15 games of the season we were 31st in CF%, 29th in GF%, and 31st in xGF%, since then we are 20th, 18th, and 23rd respectively. We were bottom-3 to start the season and have moved up to just outside the bottom-10, that's simply not "staying essentially the same during the whole season, and a bottom 5 finish is still the most likely course".
 

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,350
27,836
Montreal
Using raw goal numbers as your statistics is generally not a good choice, especially for such a low sample size where even a couple lucky bounces or empty net goals can sway the results significantly. If you look at expected goals for and against or even chances/high dancer chances for & against the Habs are a much worse team than you might think. We're dead last in the league at xGA/60 & High danger chances against, and bottom 3 in Corsi % and unblocked shots against. So essentially you could say that having the 21st best SV% in the league is a great result when you have what could be counted among the worst defences in the league.

Replacing Barron with Carrier has improved the underlying analytics somewhat, but at 5v5 this is still a bottom 5 team that just has two amazing finishers in Laine & Caufield and a bottom 6 forward group that is red hot in a way that is very unsustainable.
I'm referring to December, which is when we started to see real improvement. If you look at the entire season, yeah, the first two months were awful and really drag down the overall numbers.

Since the start of this month, possession numbers have been climbing. In fact, December's SAT% Close is pretty good – 13th in the league. Unblocked shot attempts close even better – 7th best. "Close" is the possession % I look at most, since the most time in a game is usually played within a goal. Our PDO is 100.8, practically even, so nothing to suggest we're being carried by goaltending.

Obviously it's too soon to say whether this is a trend, but at the very least this month has been a positive sign.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,312
21,853
Replacing Barron with Carrier has improved the underlying analytics somewhat, but at 5v5 this is still a bottom 5 team that just has two amazing finishers in Laine & Caufield and a bottom 6 forward group that is red hot in a way that is very unsustainable.

If you leave out everything that's good about the Habs, what you have left is a bad team ;-)
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,642
17,698
Replacing Barron with Carrier has improved the underlying analytics somewhat, but at 5v5 this is still a bottom 5 team that just has two amazing finishers in Laine & Caufield and a bottom 6 forward group that is red hot in a way that is very unsustainable.
The 3rd line Gallagher / Anderson has outplayed their opposition in all but a couple of games since start of the season - not sure what trend point defines being sustainable but coming into the season one of the teams strengths was the depth factor of the bottom-6
 

SwiftyHab

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 18, 2004
5,038
10,162
Platinum Member
The rebel anti-tank forces are coming for this tank-empire thread after we win this game.

IMG_2953.jpeg










You’ve been warned
 

HabsCowboysOwn

Wak Prescott the 60M/yr scam artist, here we gooo!
Feb 28, 2008
2,737
5,274
Montréal
See when our ''core players'' score and win us games I can live with it but I fail to see how goals and wins courtesy of Armia, Dvorak, Gallagher and even Evans help us in any way, shape or form. None of these guys are part of the future.

Can we just please trade some of them now that their value is at the highest it'll ever be and if we keep winning with even more rookies on the team so be it I won't complain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeliveauFan4ever

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
8,646
14,658
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site
Nope, not doing it, as I said this team is better than what they've shown thus far. I have all the patience in the world for this rebuild and realize we're going to struggle at times, but IMO this year was all about being a transitional one with progress across the board, that is/was the expectation.

We've epically struggled out of the gate, but I'm positive this team will turn it around and all this handwringing and moaning about the state of this organization and it's coaching will be seen as nothing more than emotional hot takes that will be looked at as silly in hindsight.

Can it be better? Absolutely. Will it get better? I'm of the belief it will.

Dach, shaking off the dust as the season progresses will help immensely, Slaf rounding back into form as well, (seems traditionally like a slow starter) Laine will help, the young D will progress etc..

All is fine. It may have it's ugly moments, but a rebuild is gonna be that way at times.

 
Last edited:

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,829
6,576
See when our ''core players'' score and win us games I can live with it but I fail to see how goals and wins courtesy of Armia, Dvorak, Gallagher and even Evans help us in any way, shape or form. None of these guys are part of the future.

Can we just please trade some of them now that their value is at the highest it'll ever be and if we keep winning with even more rookies on the team so be it I won't complain.
If Guhle's shot goes off a Tampa's player skate instead of Dvorak's or Heineman shoots instead of passes on a 2-1 should that really change your opinion on the game in any way?

The young guys were hugely important to 3 of the 4 non-empty net goals. And really the takeaway should probably be the shot totals which everyone vet, young, core, depth, contributed to.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,642
17,698
See when our ''core players'' score and win us games I can live with it but I fail to see how goals and wins courtesy of Armia, Dvorak, Gallagher and even Evans help us in any way, shape or form. None of these guys are part of the future.

Can we just please trade some of them now that their value is at the highest it'll ever be and if we keep winning with even more rookies on the team so be it I won't complain.
The future is now - playing meaningful high intensity games into April and potentially playoffs is important for development of over 52% of the roster that are “part of the future”
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad