We are the 2nd youngest team in the league, and we are likely to be even younger next year, so the difference is being patient is a genuine evaluation of what should be done in our rebuild and therefore is hockey talk.
Age doesn't play hockey, hockey players play hockey. Potential doesn’t play hockey, hockey players play hockey.
Personally, I prefer good hockey players, as a set or group, over young hockey players.
Your regressive and reductive attitude would have you praising a team with hopeless 21 year old AHLers over a team with a higher average age and more skilled and productive players simply because the former group is younger and thus has more time to develop (and therefore needs more patience).
This is why the “hush, be patient” attitude is a dead end.
Waiting for a lumbering truck to cross a finish line at the Grand Prix won’t ever mean it has won the race. Do we have a car that can win the actual race? Do we have the right team, the right managers, the right components? Patience is not the main factor in these evaluations.
Even tanking can be evaluated and re-evaluated. We’ve already discussed Dach and Newhook plenty but the other issue is MSL and Hughes’ insistence upon giving him (an inexperienced coach) full reign.
There are loads of aspects to this hockey team to evaluate and discuss on a hockey forum.