Official Tank Thread

Jurivan Demidovsky

Registered User
Nov 26, 2024
66
119
Totally on board with that but very much doubt that Geoff Molson will stay the course that long (he’s been getting a lot of pressure from the low audience ratings from his broadcasters).

Nothing ever comes to fruition when Geoffy gets his dirty paws in the best of processes. Wouldn’t be surprised if he instructed his management to use that cap leverage next summer for quick fixes — and that would suck if it happened. 💀
That's a bargain bin move if I've ever seen one, let's hope they are smarter than that. Maybe Molson will tell the media to shut up again soon like he did when he was protecting Bergevin. I think we could make the playoffs as early as next season, and that would be good experience for the youngsters, but I hope they are realistic in their expectations. We might be the youngest team in the league right now, and we're about to get even younger with the influx of talent we have recently acquired and will acquire through the 2025 draft. Actual contention for the Cup is still many miles away.
 

Jurivan Demidovsky

Registered User
Nov 26, 2024
66
119
I would never go back to the Bergevin era. The cup final was 100% a fluke
We had no business being there, but it was fun as hell to watch them destroy the Leafs, and beat a powerhouse like Vegas. Who knows, if the Islanders beat the Lightning in game 7 the Habs might have been "covid cup champions".

"Carey can backstop us to a cup, you don't need offense"

- Bargain Bin -
 
  • Like
Reactions: badfish and knuck

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,208
27,458
Montreal
You're the one fooling yourself if you think what we had prerebuild-wise is enough to build on without waiting for actual draftees to come in and develop. The core will be Suzuki, Caufield, Guhle, Slaf, Hutson, Demidov, Fowler, Dobes, Reinbacher, Hage, Beck, Mailloux, Heineman and whoever else we draft this year and if you notice among those names, only 2 are older than 23 and on the team. More than half our future core aren't on the team yet, and 3 of them who are on the team are only around 20 years old. You've been wanting them out of the bottom as soon as 2 years ago. You've been predicting them out of the bottom 5 since after the Slaf/Hutson draft. Maybe your expectations are whack.
Nope. I was happy they tanked last year and the two years before then. Expectations became higher this season because Dach was back, Guhle and Slafkovsky were a year older, we added Hutson and Laine, and Montembeault looked like he was becoming a solid starter.

To be crystal clear, I wasn't expecting the playoffs this season, just a marginal improvement from a young roster. So far, they haven't grown as much as hoped, but the season is still young.

You seem to think our current roster is just a placeholder while we await the real core of hypothetical players from the future. Frankly, it's the oldest illusion in the book. Yes, Demidov looks great and I'm excited about two or three other prospects, but we're not going anywhere unless our current roster improves.

I'll repeat: People are fooling themselves if they believe Demidov, Hage, and a 2025 pick will turn this team around. First and foremost, this team needs to turn itself around.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,346
12,706
Nope. I was happy they tanked last year and the two years before then. Expectations became higher this season because Dach was back, Guhle and Slafkovsky were a year older, we added Hutson and Laine, and Montembeault looked like he was becoming a solid starter.

To be crystal clear, I wasn't expecting the playoffs this season, just a marginal improvement from a young roster. So far, they haven't grown as much as hoped, but the season is still young.

You seem to think our current roster is just a placeholder while we await the real core of hypothetical players from the future. Frankly, it's the oldest illusion in the book. Yes, Demidov looks great and I'm excited about two or three other prospects, but we're not going anywhere unless our current roster improves.

I'll repeat: People are fooling themselves if they believe Demidov, Hage, and a 2025 pick will turn this team around. First and foremost, this team needs to turn itself around.
To add... Rebuilding is building

Building a culture
Building a roster
Building a prospect pool
Building a workable cap structure
Building a development staff
etc.

Rebuilding teams tank because they lack some or all of these aspects. The simple passing of time does nothing to solve problems. The actual building up of these things actually resolves them. Waiting for a brimming "asset pool" (term used by the user Oz) does what if the culture is bad and the development staff are no good etc? We know what it does, and it ain't good.

Do we have the right builders and are they building the right way? It might be too early to tell but to be told "be patient." by so many commentators and media types only makes me want to be more objective and less hopeful in my evaluation of some of these moves the HuGo cohort made. What did they see in Newhook that Newhook's own team didn't see? What did they miss in evaluating Dach's mentality? How did they decide that Reinbacher was preferred to Michkov? Why did they target Barron? What is the plan with MSL if he continues to be unable to wrangle together consistent efforts from the team? etc.
 

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,483
34,973
Hockey Mecca
Nope. I was happy they tanked last year and the two years before then. Expectations became higher this season because Dach was back, Guhle and Slafkovsky were a year older, we added Hutson and Laine, and Montembeault looked like he was becoming a solid starter.

To be crystal clear, I wasn't expecting the playoffs this season, just a marginal improvement from a young roster. So far, they haven't grown as much as hoped, but the season is still young.

You seem to think our current roster is just a placeholder while we await the real core of hypothetical players from the future. Frankly, it's the oldest illusion in the book. Yes, Demidov looks great and I'm excited about two or three other prospects, but we're not going anywhere unless our current roster improves.

I'll repeat: People are fooling themselves if they believe Demidov, Hage, and a 2025 pick will turn this team around. First and foremost, this team needs to turn itself around.

Man don't talk of illusion when you're banking on a bunch of hopeful b grade or lower young players already on the team, yet disparaging A and double AA prospects as illusions. The hypocrisy is astounding.


Notwithstanding your moving of goalposts, you WERE predicting them outside the bottom 5 as soon as 2 summers ago. And repeated that prediction every year. Don't try to pretend otherwise. I was there, I remember. It shows you were already eager for the team to be competitive way too early and was swayed by the illusion of hopeful B and C grade prospects eventually making the team competitive, or reclamation projects from other teams like Dach and Newhook.

Say whatever you want, I'm pretty that 5 years from now, the Barrons, Strubles, Newhooks and Montys of the team will be a thing of the past and most of the names I previously listed will form the core.
 

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,208
27,458
Montreal
To add... Rebuilding is building

Building a culture
Building a roster
Building a prospect pool
Building a workable cap structure
Building a development staff
etc.

Rebuilding teams tank because they lack some or all of these aspects. The simple passing of time does nothing to solve problems. The actual building up of these things actually resolves them. Waiting for a brimming "asset pool" (term used by the user Oz) does what if the culture is bad and the development staff are no good etc? We know what it does, and it ain't good.

Do we have the right builders and are they building the right way? It might be too early to tell but to be told "be patient." by so many commentators and media types only makes me want to be more objective and less hopeful in my evaluation of some of these moves the HuGo cohort made. What did they see in Newhook that Newhook's own team didn't see? What did they miss in evaluating Dach's mentality? How did they decide that Reinbacher was preferred to Michkov? Why did they target Barron? What is the plan with MSL if he continues to be unable to wrangle together consistent efforts from the team? etc.
True - rebuilding is building.

When asked to grade the rebuild I gave HuGo an "A" because they're attempting to build something. Hard to say how the actual moves will turn out, but so far I like the vision behind them. Dach and Newhook may prove to be mistakes, but those are the kind of calculated risks needed to build the front-end of a rebuild. For the record, I still have faith in Dach, although he – along with the rest of the team – needs to show progress.

The thing about patience is that it's a good thing, as long as it comes with markers and expectations. Rush the rebuild and you've wasted everyone's time. Wait too long, impose no expectations, and the steak is burnt, your R&D funding has run out, the girl you like has friend-zoned you, and your hockey rebuild has to rebuild.

I'm still being patient, but I'm keeping an eye on that steak.
 

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,208
27,458
Montreal
Man don't talk of illusion when you're banking on a bunch of hopeful b grade or lower young players already on the team, yet disparaging A and double AA prospects as illusions. The hypocrisy is astounding.


Notwithstanding your moving of goalposts, you WERE predicting them outside the bottom 5 as soon as 2 summers ago. And repeated that prediction every year. Don't try to pretend otherwise. I was there, I remember. It shows you were already eager for the team to be competitive way too early and was swayed by the illusion of hopeful B and C grade prospects eventually making the team competitive, or reclamation projects from other teams like Dach and Newhook.

Say whatever you want, I'm pretty that 5 years from now, the Barrons, Strubles, Newhooks and Montys of the team will be a thing of the past and most of the names I previously listed will form the core.

Try to read what's actually there. Nobody's "Disparaging" our prospects. And I did want us to tank. Kindly stop making shit up.

To be clear, you're saying our current roster is filled with B-grade players... and you believe our prospects are A and AA. Certainly hope you're right but, as I said, this sounds suspiciously like the same overhyped/over-hoped faith that's gotten us nowhere over the years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,483
34,973
Hockey Mecca
Try to read what's actually there. Nobody's "Disparaging" our prospects. And I did want us to tank. Kindly stop making shit up.

To be clear, you're saying our current roster is filled with B-grade players... and you believe our prospects are A and AA. Certainly hope you're right but, as I said, this sounds suspiciously like the same overhyped/over-hoped faith that's gotten us nowhere over the years.

If you can't understand the difference in pedigree between a Slaf and a Roy, or a Struble and a Hutson, there's really nothing to talk about. Our draft picks of the past were 1-done with much lesser drafting power 2-another management team. If you want to die on the hill of this false equivalency, all the power to you. It's still hypocritical to call that an illusion when you're hoping the same out of players with lesser pedigree.
 

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
23,091
18,066
If you can't understand the difference in pedigree between a Slaf and a Roy, or a Struble and a Hutson, there's really nothing to talk about. Our draft picks of the past were 1-done with much lesser drafting power 2-another management team. If you want to die on the hill of this false equivalency, all the power to you. It's still hypocritical to call that an illusion when you're hoping the same out of players with lesser pedigree.

To be fair, I can't tell the difference between Slaf and Gallagher at this point.
 

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,208
27,458
Montreal
If you can't understand the difference in pedigree between a Slaf and a Roy, or a Struble and a Hutson, there's really nothing to talk about. Our draft picks of the past were 1-done with much lesser drafting power 2-another management team. If you want to die on the hill of this false equivalency, all the power to you. It's still hypocritical to call that an illusion when you're hoping the same out of players with lesser pedigree.
Your argument is all over the place. What do Roy and Struble have to do with anything?

Frankly, 'pedigree' is a weak argument. Here's our current core's pedigree:
• Slafkovsky: 1st overall
• Caufield: 15th OA, now definitely top-10 in a redraft.
• Suzuki: 13th OA, now definitely top-10 in a redraft.
• Dach: 3rd OA, who looked like a beast pre-injury.
• Guhle: 16th OA, becoming a prospective 1st pairing D
• Newhook: 16th OA, a buy-low opportunity.
• Hutson: A later round steal, a prospective star

Aside from Demidov, which incoming prospects project higher than the above guys? Sure, we can criticize Dach and Newhook now, but before their ups and downs in the NHL, they were highly-touted prospects with at least as much pedigree as the prospects you believe are coming to save the day.

Oh, and don't forget that Primeau once had a great pedigree. He was a highly touted All-Star goalie in NCAA and AHL. That's the problem with pedigrees – they don't directly translate into NHL success.

So much for 'pedigree'.

To be clear, I'm sure we'll be a better team with Demidov, Hage, Reinbacher, etc. I'm excited about our prospects, but they won't turn us into a winning team unless the current core can win on their own. Like them or not, the current core is the foundation of this rebuild.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hansman and ReHabs

rahad

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
2,063
2,495
montreal
It's going to be so tempting to tank for the 2026 and 2027 drafts...
Don't be surprise to see many team starting to tank in 2026. Like they did with Bedard in 2023.
For us, we need to aim for a playoff spot next season. You don't want to become the next Ottawa or red wing.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,792
107,617
Halifax
Don't be surprise to see many team starting to tank in 2026. Like they did with Bedard in 2023.
For us, we need to aim for a playoff spot next season. You don't want to become the next Ottawa or red wing.

Red Wings are a team that tried to push itself out inorganically by paying a bunch of mid UFAs money.. Ottawa and Buffalo are more linked. Detroit is the model a bunch of impatient fans want to take.
 

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,483
34,973
Hockey Mecca
Don't be surprise to see many team starting to tank in 2026. Like they did with Bedard in 2023.
For us, we need to aim for a playoff spot next season. You don't want to become the next Ottawa or red wing.

Like WTK said, Detroit tried to shorten their rebuild and look at how that went.

As for Ottawa, we are just 5 years removed from them trading away Mark Stone because they had a cheapskate owner. They didn't have the money to hold on to players. They lost a 1st pick to the league in that span too. Melnick was so cheap, he cut down on the vegan meals for whatever player i can't remember. Habs won't have those problems.

Habs aren't Buffalo either. Another team whom in their first rebuild, tried to fill the team with UFAs and failed and had to rebuild again.

You can chose to try to shorten a rebuild and live with the consequences, or you can let it grow organically and in that case, you can't chose when you start competing again. You have to wait for things to coalesce and come to a boiling point.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,259
11,980
Like WTK said, Detroit tried to shorten their rebuild and look at how that went.

As for Ottawa, we are just 5 years removed from them trading away Mark Stone because they had a cheapskate owner. They didn't have the money to hold on to players. They lost a 1st pick to the league in that span too. Melnick was so cheap, he cut down on the vegan meals for whatever player i can't remember. Habs won't have those problems.

Habs aren't Buffalo either. Another team whom in their first rebuild, tried to fill the team with UFAs and failed and had to rebuild again.

You can chose to try to shorten a rebuild and live with the consequences, or you can let it grow organically and in that case, you can't chose when you start competing again. You have to wait for things to coalesce and come to a boiling point.
Ottawa also tried to shorten their rebuilt with trades and they have 3 more points than the Habs right now (same amount of games).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad