Hannibal
Fear the Weber
- Feb 11, 2007
- 11,141
- 8,721
Surrounding them with better veterans leads to drafting 10-15 instead of top 5, and less playing time for the young guys. Pain is the way forward.A monumental mistake is not surrounding these young players with competent Veterans.
It doesn't work well if you damage the existing young players by building a losing culture in a pressure packed environment like MontrealSurrounding them with better veterans leads to drafting 10-15 instead of top 5, and less playing time for the young guys. Pain is the way forward.
Florida has one of the most underrated coaches in the league and the best GM in the league (+ externalities in its favour).We suck until further notice. It was the same for Florida.
A monumental mistake is not surrounding these young players with competent Veterans.
Buffalo is a model franchise, right?Surrounding them with better veterans leads to drafting 10-15 instead of top 5, and less playing time for the young guys. Pain is the way forward.
I agree, a rebuild takes time, but 'time' is only an asset if players are using it to develop & make progress. By itself, time does nothing, unless something actually happens. So far this season, our roster looks like Quebec's bridges – time marches on, the same problems persist, and nothing's happening.The players from our first rebuild draft are 20 years old. It was always gonna take time. It's not the Oilers, or Sens, or whoever's route, but the simple reality of an asset base that got obliterated by losing arguably its three most important players (SW, CP, PD) in a moment where the roster wasn't all that great to start with. Filling back that asset base takes time.
I agree, a rebuild takes time, but 'time' is only an asset if players are using it to develop & make progress. By itself, time does nothing, unless something actually happens. So far this season, our roster looks like Quebec's bridges – time marches on, the same problems persist, and nothing's happening.
Most of our young players have two/three seasons under their belt – still very young, but two/three years is enough time to show some progress... even small incremental steps. If this turns into another tank season, it means our core has made no progress from last year. If the Habs finish at the bottom for the fourth consecutive season, how has 'taking time' benefitted us?
We can celebrate the possibility of another top pick in 2025, but we need to ask ourselves what kind of team will that kid be joining. Will he and Demidov join a young team that's learning how to win, or will they join a young team that can't put it together?
Time's ticking. That doesn't mean we stop being patient. It means rebuilding requires both patience and progress. We can't have one without the other.
There's a pair of arguments made hereI agree, a rebuild takes time, but 'time' is only an asset if players are using it to develop & make progress. By itself, time does nothing, unless something actually happens. So far this season, our roster looks like Quebec's bridges – time marches on, the same problems persist, and nothing's happening.
Most of our young players have two/three seasons under their belt – still very young, but two/three years is enough time to show some progress... even small incremental steps. If this turns into another tank season, it means our core has made no progress from last year. If the Habs finish at the bottom for the fourth consecutive season, how has 'taking time' benefitted us?
We can celebrate the possibility of another top pick in 2025, but we need to ask ourselves what kind of team will that kid be joining. Will he and Demidov join a young team that's learning how to win, or will they join a young team that can't put it together?
Time's ticking. That doesn't mean we stop being patient. It means rebuilding requires both patience and progress. We can't have one without the other.
You think Buffalo didn't tank hard enough?Since 2016, Buffalo has drafted top 5 once. You tank and acquire difference-makers in successive years, or you become Buffalo, Ottawa or Detroit, where you half-ass your rebuilt and get out of it too early.
No, they tried to get out early. But I made a mistake, they drafted top 5 twice, not once.You think Buffalo didn't tank hard enough?
it’s official that we’re in the mix for last place. Thats the only thing we’re in the mix forSo this thread must mean "we not in da mix" then I guess.
ExactlySince 2016, Buffalo has drafted top 5 once. You tank and acquire difference-makers in successive years, or you become Buffalo, Ottawa or Detroit, where you half-ass your rebuilt and get out of it too early.
In your opinion, what did they do to not tank hard enough? What was their mistake?No, they tried to get out early. But I made a mistake, they drafted top 5 twice, not once.
They picked 1st overall in 2018 and 2021.Since 2016, Buffalo has drafted top 5 once. You tank and acquire difference-makers in successive years, or you become Buffalo, Ottawa or Detroit, where you half-ass your rebuilt and get out of it too early.
Dmen don't count.They picked 1st overall in 2018 and 2021.
Since 2016, Buffalo has drafted top 5 once. You tank and acquire difference-makers in successive years, or you become Buffalo, Ottawa or Detroit, where you half-ass your rebuilt and never get out of ittoo early.
Florida has one of the most underrated coaches in the league and the best GM in the league (+ externalities in its favour).
We have one of the most overrated coaches in the league and Hughes' ability to make a positive impact on the roster is TBD until further notice (+ negative externalities against us).
I wouldn't try to emulate the Florida model... we need a more proactive GM who trades and wheels and deals.
Before the on-ice product is even evaluated, it all starts with accountability and standards and expectations:
Has the GM put together a roster that is worthy of playing serious hockey?
Has the coaching staff done their part to prepare the players tactically and on special teams?
Has the physio staff done their part to keep the players in top condition?
Has the development/hockeyops staff done their part to ensure continuous growth for the players?
etc.
I think Hughes got it wrong with the defense but other decisions would've involved a tradeoff re: cost vs reward/upside. It's often repeated we don't have the asset base to go big game hunting or shopping, spending to acquire another 2nd line forward and have it only fall on its face would've really burned us too. So I can forgive them for standing pat and taking a swing on Patrik Laine. I would've liked a better bottom6... but again, Armia looked good last year and Dvorak was out injured a lot... It's hard to plan around injury prone players on chunky cap hits.
You need consecutive years of top 5 picks, making the right picks, so that you build a nucleus of difference makers in the same age-group, and then you build around them through trades (using your draft capital), acquiring the right players (M. Tkachuk, not J. Skinner), and a few of your complementary draftees become contributors as well.In your opinion, what did they do to not tank hard enough? What was their mistake?
What shortcuts did they take that ruined their tank since 2012??You need consecutive years of top 5 picks, making the right picks, so that you build a nucleus of difference makers in the same age-group, and then you build around them through trades (using your draft capital), acquiring the right players (M. Tkachuk, not J. Skinner), and a few of your complementary draftees become contributors as well.