Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,235
- 9,426
It's a laugh and a half. Seriously it's all making fun of our lineup, not realizing that their lineup is a bunch of 40 point players, and a 4 point player.
FIFY
Last edited:
It's a laugh and a half. Seriously it's all making fun of our lineup, not realizing that their lineup is a bunch of 40 point players, and a 4 point player.
I know, right. DirecTV Center Ice said they are about to renew customer subscriptions, so at least someone is planning on broadcasting.A week away! is there any word on broadcast schedule?
It's a laugh and a half. Seriously it's all making fun of our lineup, not realizing that their lineup is a bunch of 40 point players.
Nah, we lost to a goalie who put up 2 shutouts and posted a .958 save percentage when his career average is .908Didn’t we just lose a series to a team like that?
We’re the best Canadian team on paper. Let’s hope we want to work hard and do the dirty work to earn it this year.
Nah, we lost to a goalie who put up 2 shutouts and posted a .958 save percentage when his career average is .908
Over a full season? Nope.No way Carey Price could do that....
Didn’t we just lose a series to a team like that?
We’re the best Canadian team on paper. Let’s hope we want to work hard and do the dirty work to earn it this year.
Nah, we lost to a goalie who put up 2 shutouts and posted a .958 save percentage when his career average is .908
To be fair its not really the loss that hurts - Markstrom was not likely to repeat that career year anyways.
But why they wasted that money on Holtby I do not know.
I was thinking the same thing. I said it before last season started and I'll say it again now - I don't care much what they do during the regular season, I will judge this team by how they perform in the playoffs. Last season by that standard was an abject failure, let's hope we do better this time around.
We lost to a team, not a goalie. Their goalies IMHO were good, but not as good as the numbers would suggest. We had an edge in play but not that much of an edge and our performance in the last deciding game was subpar. For a team as stacked with talent as ours, this was a failure plain and simple.
The motto for this season should be this - no more excuses, just win!
I was thinking the same thing. I said it before last season started and I'll say it again now - I don't care much what they do during the regular season, I will judge this team by how they perform in the playoffs. Last season by that standard was an abject failure, let's hope we do better this time around.
We lost to a team, not a goalie. Their goalies IMHO were good, but not as good as the numbers would suggest. We had an edge in play but not that much of an edge and our performance in the last deciding game was subpar. For a team as stacked with talent as ours, this was a failure plain and simple.
The motto for this season should be this - no more excuses, just win!
Columbus goaltending was insane.
Combined play-ins and 1st round numbers:
Top team save% (out of 24 teams)
1. Columbus: 93.92
....and they did that while facing the 5th most shots/60 and 3rd most scoring chances against/60.........all while facing two of the best finishing teams in the league in Toronto and Tampa!
Legendary goaltending performance.
Tampa got the job done largely because Vasy was elite in their series as well. (not quite god mode like Korpi but still elite)
Like I said, IMHO not nearly as good as the numbers suggest. We had an edge in play, not that big an edge though. Most of our shots weren't dangerous and we pissed away a lot of our high danger chances on our own, nothing to do with their goalies. Remember Tavares missing the empty net? We did an unacceptably poor job of converting on our chances and not all of that was due to their goalies.
Anyhow, that's just based on my eye test so feel to dismiss it and go rely on the numbers but IMHO that Tavares miss is a perfect example though of numbers not telling the whole story. That was a high danger chance, one of our best chances in the entire series come to think of it and we couldn't even put the puck on the (empty) net. Gotta do better than that, that's all there is to it.
Any line with Marner on it has no cycle game or board play.Eventually I'd love to see Thornton-Matthews-Nylander. They'd beat you up on the boards.
You don't need a goalie on taxi squad, just need 3 goalies between roster and taxi squad.If they don't need waivers yes, but always need at least 4 players on taxi squad, one being a goalie.
Hyman-Tavares-Marner was very effective in my memory at least.Any line with Marner on it has no cycle game or board play.
Didn’t he play one season with Tavares and Hyman?Any line with Marner on it has no cycle game or board play.
I feel like we've been fishing for a Hyman 2.0 in Vesey and Joey Anderson. Hopefully one works out.yeah, there's a real chance here that while he's unable to be a catalyst on a scoring line in the NHL, he may thrive as a pure complementary piece on a scoring line.
I'm not hoping too hard on this one but I like having him as one of our many options for those lines.
No reason a guy who's scored 16, 17, 17 goals can't see a slight bump to 20 playing with a guy like Tavares, who has shown the ability to elevate wingers.yeah, there's a real chance here that while he's unable to be a catalyst on a scoring line in the NHL, he may thrive as a pure complementary piece on a scoring line.
I'm not hoping too hard on this one but I like having him as one of our many options for those lines.