It's weird.....you straighten me out by telling me "Clearly Flynn and RKI tried to skip some rebuiding steps", but that's kind of what I said. They tried to flip their way out of a rebuild, and got burned. Nobody disputes that. Now they're faced with a true rebuild. Nobody disputes that either.
But to pretend that teams with undisputed deep pockets don't get some player personnel benefits in major junior is just being defiant. Teams that have ownership structures of dozens of people (relax, Cape Breton has that too) aren't drafting kids making NCAA noise. (This is where you tell me that I am seriously underestimating the new Titan ownership group at my own peril. Thanks in advance)
you are right, they are able to get 2-3, sometimes more players with their deep pockets that otherwise, would not consider the Q. Unfortunately, that has created a 2 tier league. The WHL have taken steps to prevent this in the future with some serious consequences to the winterhawks (no picks in first 5 rounds this year and no first round picks from 2014-17), and so has the OHL with the spitfires. I really hope the Q at some point sends the same message to their teams. There are 4-5 teams that can acquire 100% of the players available, and then there are the rest of the teams that realistically can draw about 60% of the player pool to their location.
At one point the Sea dogs had 9 players that supposedly "committed" to the NCAA, but amazingly they all decided to go the junior route after "discussing" with the sea dogs. Everyone in this blog knows who the teams are, that is just one example.
Having said all of that, rebuilding is much more to do with good asset management, versus money. Some teams gather all the picks in the world, and still never get it right (BAT, CAP,PEI). Some teams, while maybe not full of cash to offer, have done a great job of getting everything they could from what they have, (BC, Val D'or, RN are some examples)