LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
One of the EP guys thinks Fiddler will go top 10.
Kid certainly keeps his options open with playing for Canada & now USA (he went to a few US camps in between there too).
One of the EP guys thinks Fiddler will go top 10.
I don't buy the size argument with Buium, I think Briere was deflecting. Maybe there's some issue that caused him to drop that hasn't become public knowledge? Given his role is offensive facilitator, size shouldn't matter. Nor do I buy "we already have these kind of guys" b/c if Buium was that good, you can move one of the guys who isn't as good. There's something that caused 11 teams to pass on him.We know that size argument is a mountain of horseshit when the Flyers two most important 23 and under defensive pieces, which they spent the highest value assets on, are both 5'11. And they acquired and tried to re-sign 5'11 Sean Walker. And the next best defensive prospect in the system, who Flahr called the 3rd best D prospect in his class (after Sanderson and Drysdale), is 5'9. Not even the Flyers believe a 6' defender is too small. They just committed cardinal sins like drafting fit over BPA, counting their chickens before they hatch, overvaluing their own talent, and not understanding that you solve fit from the top down.
Someone like Molendyk has a Forsling-like profile. But 6' LHD < 6'2 RHD. Can you imagine the lineup problems they'd have with Molendyk and Buium? Bullet dodged.
His mailbag was an interesting read too
At this (again, early) stage, I’d qualify 2025 as a below-average draft class.
Too early to tell how good the draft is as a whole imo. Most interesting thing here is him saying hockey guys have Schaefer at 2-3 already. I like him but he's gonna need a big jump in production this year for that.His mailbag was an interesting read too
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5698485/2024/08/14/2025-nhl-draft-james-hagens/
One of us!I like him but he's gonna need a big jump in production this year for that.
Maybe the Flyers scouts and staff didn’t see Buium as a number 1 like a lot of us did. Maybe they are right and we are wrong. Maybe we are right and they are wrong. Either is possible and only time will tell.Not to continue to harp on this, but it baffles me they passed on the projected 1D in a D heavy draft for a C, when next year is fixing to be a very strong C heavy draft. Maybe they are trying to zig while others zag but seems a bit like a backwards approach.
If Buium dropped out of the top ten, it's rational to assume most teams didn't see him as a #1 D-man.
Odds are he was seen as a 2nd pair, PP1 QB guy, still valuable, but not enough to trade into the top ten to grab him. Since no one did.
Dahlin #1, Hughes #7, Boqvist #8, Bouchard #10, Dobson #12.
Next tier started at #17 with Ty Smith.
Boqvist might have been overdrafted, I'll make the argument that Bouchard/Dobson is a draw.
FYI- his son looks like a pretty good prospect for next year.
Luka Radivojevic - Stats, Contract, Salary & More
Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Luka Radivojevic, 2007-01-03 Edina, MN, USA Slovakia. Most recently in the USHL with Muskegon Lumberjacks. Complete player biography and stats.www.eliteprospects.com
He’s gonna go in like the 6th round at that size if the trend continues. His dad played with Briere though.
Flyers type of guy to reach for
Scouting Swedish Junior hockey in September? Pace yourself.Michal Svrcek is a fun watch. Not sure how good he is yet but I like him.