Mangosteen
Ground hog day no more
- Apr 9, 2018
- 1,509
- 1,125
I been trying to trade Crouse for two years. Was hopeful that the move would create emotion in him again.
Sergachev - MarinoKeller - Cooley - Guenther
But - Hayton - Schmaltz
Crouse - Iginla - Maccelli
McBain - Stenlund - Doan
That is an extremely young group.Keller - Cooley - Guenther
But - Hayton - Schmaltz
Crouse - Iginla - Maccelli
McBain - Stenlund - Doan
I somewhat doubt we'll see Iginla in the NHL next season, isn't BA on record that he wants to let prospects develop, or am I misremembering?We currently have an empty slot for a 12th forward. I count that spot as Doan's.
Next year But and Iginla replace Bjugstad and Kerfoot. Crouse, Maccelli and Schmaltz will stick around next year for continuity.
I think he's not too dogmatic about good long cookings. Cooley, Guenther must have showed, that they could belong, got a shot and are now regulars. MavLam could be next. Kolya on the other hand took a little longer and is doing at least Ok nowI somewhat doubt we'll see Iginla in the NHL next season, isn't BA on record that he wants to let prospects develop, or am I misremembering?
I do think Tij'll get his 9 games in anyways.I somewhat doubt we'll see Iginla in the NHL next season, isn't BA on record that he wants to let prospects develop, or am I misremembering?
Guenther was cooking in junior and minors for a long time.I think he's not too dogmatic about good long cookings. Cooley, Guenther must have showed, that they could belong, got a shot and are now regulars. MavLam could be next. Kolya on the other hand took a little longer and is doing at least Ok now
edit: typos. too early, not enough caffeine
It’s so young that the usual suspects will be crying of rebuild failure all over again! Many of whom, were outspoken proponents of playing youth over NHL’ers.That is an extremely young group.
And is Iginla really a C?
That is an extremely young group.
And is Iginla really a C?
You're right.I somewhat doubt we'll see Iginla in the NHL next season, isn't BA on record that he wants to let prospects develop, or am I misremembering?
McAvoy would cost Keller.I wonder if a trade with the Bruins may be possible? A shake up by them that we can take advantage of.
Valmaki-Stenlund
4
Carlo-Frederic
We probably are on Carlo's modified NTC and I would prefer Peeke, but the B's would prefer to keep him and they already have someone like Stenlund.l
I wonder if they would entertain trading McAvoy?
That's not entertaining! McAvoy is the one not living up to his contract.McAvoy would cost Keller.