Brilliant.
Tolvanen atm is the only one that bothers me. Sherwood may get up there if he can reproduce this season. That said I would have kept him rather than Smith.Trenin now makes 3.5 million and had 7G 8A 15P.
It took two full seasons in Columbus to for Olivier to get into double digital goals. He had 5 in the two previous seasons.
Tolvanen and Sherwood are really the only mistakes. Tolvaven was an obvious NHL player on a cheap ass contract. Sherwood may of seemed replaceable but we gave smith and McCarron contract extensions so why not him.
Either way none of them have the seasons they did in Nashville. Except trenin.... his offensive numbers suck and he is overpaid. Seems right up our alley.
Only one of those that bother me is Tolvanen, because it was just a poor decision that didn't need to be made.We don't suck because we lost Tolvanen, Jankowski, Carrier, Sherwood, or Trenin, that's for sure. (Or Jeannot, or anybody else we lost who is actually semi-sucking elsewhere). There is a little bit of a death-by-1000-cuts effect I guess. But we did backfill most of those guys adequately. At least from a pure performance-on-ice perspective. The only problem is we backfilled them with older and more expensive guys. And therefore still neither upgraded the upper end/elite-talent of our roster, nor developed young players into those roles. So it's not like losing those guys per se caused the downfall. They were mild symtpoms. Or could have been. If we had done everything else right. Except we had a complete immune system failure at the top, so that even smaller infections which would otherwise have been harmless became magnified, and we still ultimately died from basic general system failure.
![]()
He definitely got better as the year went on. He's a guy if he worked in the offseason on the defensive side of his game could be a solid guy. He's like a lot of offensive Dmen, needs to learn that's the bonus to his game and can earn him big bucks, but your defensive game keeps you in the leagueAm I the only one that kind of like Barron and sees some potential in him or am I just way off?
Perhaps we extend McCarron, Smith, Lauzon, and Sissons at first chance?Ok, you’re sitting around a room with the ass’t GM’s, coaches, scouts and maybe Haslam. You say “we gotta improve next year; what do we do?” The GM raises his hand and says “Well, first of all we gotta get Englund under contract. Anything else?”.
I agree he does show potential, however the real question is if he'll get developed correctly with the current staff.Am I the only one that kind of like Barron and sees some potential in him or am I just way off?
They may just anoint him "Josi light" if Josi decides it's not worth more brain damage.I agree he does show potential, however the real question is if he'll get developed correctly with the current staff.
I would think Marchy should still have positive value. His point production on an offensively starved team was still in line with his salary. Cap is set to jump over the next couple offseasons as well so his aging should be a non factor as even if his production doesn't go up with a competent coaching and system his caphit isn't bad.Marchessault traded at negative/zero value and Brunette retained. That'll fix it.
What are you going to do with Stamkos that said basically the same thing let alone anyone else that may agree with them? Marchessault isn't on an island with is opinion.Marchessault traded at negative/zero value and Brunette retained. That'll fix it.
The other part of this equation is both March and Stamkos have both won whereas AB was let go for his inability to win with a stacked roster and has shat the bed since his arrival here.What are you going to do with Stamkos that said basically the same thing let alone anyone else that may agree with them? Marchessault isn't on an island with is opinion.