Off Season Move(s) Thread | Page 17 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Off Season Move(s) Thread

Not sure about rumor; reason would be a shake up for a team that might be stalling, younger, more offensive.

I don’t consider very likely though, tbh.
I would be completely fine with someone like him in a trade. Think it gives them cap flexibility/certainty to improve the winger position either this offseason or the following.

I just feel like you’d hear some rumblings if he was somebody that was a realistic option. It’s why I think Peterka is the most likely player we’re gonna be bringing in.
 
I think Peterka is a higher end player than Cirelli. I see him having 80+ point potential. That would be the type of winger depth we need without having a high end center.
I do agree that Peterka is a higher end offensive player than Cirelli and would prefer Peterka than Cirelli. However, Cirelli would help in other departments that would be valuable to this team (PK, defending late game leads, covering for Ek when he is out injured, etc).
 
I would be completely fine with someone like him in a trade. Think it gives them cap flexibility/certainty to improve the winger position either this offseason or the following.

I just feel like you’d hear some rumblings if he was somebody that was a realistic option. It’s why I think Peterka is the most likely player we’re gonna be bringing in.

It's because he's not a realistic target. He's just a name that is possible in theory for trade until July 1st.

He'd be great to have in MN, but Tampa has 0 reason to trade him and nobody to replace what he adds to their team (d-zone, PK, etc).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad