Agree with the entire sentiment here. I would do it for Jansen (not a chance in heck for Kirk), but it seems on the surface to be an overpay by the Sox.That almost seems like a bad deal for the Sox.
Kopech put up 2.2 WAR last year in 25 starts with relatively good peripherals with the added bonus of being under team control until 2025. Hendriks has been one of the better relievers in baseball over the last 4 or so seasons and last year was no different with a FIP just barely above 1 and a 142 ERA+ (1.7 WAR)
The only issue with this is Hendriks makes a pretty hefty chunk of change for a reliever.
Another thing i think that will hurt is the fact the league knows the Jays basically have to move a catcher and Sean Murphy is still floating out there.
That's a deal i would consider for Jansen but under no circumstances would i for Kirk.
Would think we’d strongly consider it, but would the Cards?That ought to get the catcher market going.
Had the thought today while out on a walk. Would anyone do Kirk/Moreno for both Nootbaar and Carlson?
The first domino on the trade market might be falling shortly;
It's definitely good. Murphy is the only other notable name on the market for catchers.This is good for the Jays I think.
Braves and Jays not exactly a good match trade wise, and it gets the other big catcher off the board.
[Davidi] Jays “are believed to have discussed Pablo Lopez at the trade deadline,” “remain engaged with” Verlander, and “have long liked Kodai Senga.”
I feel pretty confident it'll be McGriff, Mattingly, and Murphy. Belle falls short, the steroid guys won't get enough support (even though I think they should be in), and everyone continues to hate Schilling because he's a piece of shit (which I fully support).Another interesting thing to watch; the contemporary era committee is expected to vote today on their nominations for the Hall of Fame with these names on the ballot with the results expected after 8 ET.
-Albert Belle
-Barry Bonds
-Roger Clemens
-Don Mattingly
-Fred McGriff
-Dale Murphy
-Rafael Palmeiro
-Curt Schilling
Obviously the steroid thing will reign but i think it's horeshit Crime Dog isn't in the hall already. Dude would have had 500 HRs easily if not for the 94 lockout. Really all those names sans probably Murphy and depending where you stand on Donnie Baseball should be in there.
I might not like Schilling's leanings but i have a hard time agreeing with keeping it out giving some of the other malcontents you have in the hall already.
I wish i could speak on Murphy but he was way before my time. Looking at his stats he doesn't seem like a top flight HOF candidate, but nothing that screams "he's not good enough either." 2 MVPs has to be worth something right?I feel pretty confident it'll be McGriff, Mattingly, and Murphy. Belle falls short, the steroid guys won't get enough support (even though I think they should be in), and everyone continues to hate Schilling because he's a piece of shit (which I fully support).
Crime Dog the only one to clear the threshold. Unanimously too.
At some point you're going to have to let the steroid era guys in.
Pretty much where I stand. Bothers me selig is in when he turned a blind eye to it/willingly used it to boost the game's standing in the late 90s and then shamed everyone else.I was adamantly against Bonds ever getting in but have changed my thinking on it. The league turned a blind eye to it forever and then decided it had to be dealt with when they got exposed. It’s a bad look on the players and league for the era but it was what it was.
Interesting that it's just McGriff. He definitely deserves it.I wish i could speak on Murphy but he was way before my time. Looking at his stats he doesn't seem like a top flight HOF candidate, but nothing that screams "he's not good enough either." 2 MVPs has to be worth something right?
Mattingly was as well to be fair since his prime largely came before i was born but i at least know more about him.
This man should be in politics.Blue Jays ready to swap and shop as baseball Winter Meetings get under way
As Ross Atkins and the Blue Jays get set to ramp up their off season business, they do so with what they hope will be seen as ample currencytorontosun.com
The needs are clear for a team aiming to maximize the value of having stars such as Vlad Guerrero Jr., Bo Bichette, George Springer, Alek Manoah, Kevin Gausman and others in the fold. Time is also ticking for a Jays team that two months ago was flatly swept away by the Seattle Mariners in two demoralizing wildcard round games.
The needs are certainly clear for the Jays. As Atkins acknowledged at the Toronto chapter of the Baseball Writers Association of America luncheon this past week, starting pitching tops the to-do list. The team simply can’t afford to head to spring training with a rotation of Manoah, Gausman, Jose Berrios (ideally an improved version) and question mark, question mark.
With the hole in right following the Hernandez trade, there will be a re-order of the Jays outfield and ideally a left-handed bat will be brought in to the righty heavy order.
Not all of it needs to get accomplished this week, of course, and likely won’t. But the sense from Atkins is that things could move quickly at the first Winter Meetings session since 2019.
“When you come together, there’s power to that because everyone is maximizing those windows with other teams,” Atkins said. “We spend the bulk of our time with representatives of other players and with other teams, that does push things to the forefront.”
The Jays have certainly been a team able to make a splash in recent off-seasons, a process the front office hopes to continue from its base here on the San Diego waterfront.
“We are in a great position,” said Atkins, who suggested improvements are likely to come more through free agency than via trade. “We understand from a business and practical standpoint what we think is ideal for the Toronto Blue Jays organization and (Rogers) is 100 per cent on board with that.”
“We have a mutual understanding of where that range is and if we need to go past that, I’m sure they’ll answer the phone when (team president Mark Shapiro) phones.”
How that money could be spent should start to unfold over the next three days.
“We don’t have the full picture painted on exactly how to do A, B and C to make our team better,” Atkins said. “But we do have a very clear understanding of where we could take our next strategic step.”
[Sherman] Would a reclamation project with strikeout stuff such as Toronto’s Yusei Kikuchi be intriguing to the Mets — with his downside perhaps as a swing-and-miss lefty reliever?