Observations XXI

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoNecksCurse

#164303
Oct 19, 2011
13,252
5,014
kesler and johansen meet for the 1st time this year after kesler trashing talking ryjo in the summer out of nowhere.
 

MrJoshua

Registered User
Mar 24, 2010
1,573
366
Decatur, AL
Well, 15th in the league for offense, top of the league in defense ... that's about what we expected, no? I hope for better offense moving forward if the middle six can heat up (although I must say again that Turris has had a surprisingly good start to the year), but while Forsberg-Johansen-Arvidsson is a great top line, our depth after that is solid but not spectacular. So I'm not really surprised we aren't top-10 in offense.

I AM surprised that our offense is that high when our PP stinks like roadkill on a summer day.
 

Roman Yoshi

#164303
Aug 16, 2009
10,935
3,282
Franklin, TN
I really need the Preds to win tonight. You ever have those times where something as small as a hockey team beating a rival means a lot? Now would be one of those times.
 

AdmiralsFan24

Registered User
Mar 22, 2011
15,009
3,935
Wisconsin
Wouldn't the best way to look at it be 5 on 5 scoring? We get the advantage of most empty net goals but I can't see us staying at 13.6% on the PP, despite how unimaginative it is for the entire season.
 

LCPreds

Registered User
Dec 8, 2013
7,598
4,416
TN
Power play sucks but that can be fixed. If they can continue to deliver similar results to what we’ve seen to start the season then I’m ok with that. Provided they fix the power play be the end of March.
 

Pred303

Registered User
Oct 8, 2004
7,881
2,895
Murfreesboro, Tn.
i'm angry only because I hate ANA. And our PP.

you knew at some point the PP failures would start to cost us points. and that some point would come when the top line finally cooled off. Without Arvy's speed to open up the ice for Forsberg/Johansen you also knew that would cause them to quit dominating the games. personally, next I would try Smith up on that 1st line right wing. the way we are constructed, you almost have to have at least a goal per game from that top line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roman Yoshi

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,078
12,537
I'm sure everybody has a pet theory on how to fix the PP. I'm pretty convinced that Subban is our best point-man there, despite the struggles and funks that he seems to somehow get into. With Arvy out, I'd go with JoF-Ha putting Hartman in the crease, and try to get Subban to play himself out of the funk moreso than leaning on Josi-Ellis... but admittedly it is just one subjective hunch and I don't honestly have any particular faith in any specific solution. :(
 

Pred303

Registered User
Oct 8, 2004
7,881
2,895
Murfreesboro, Tn.
our handedness somewhat limits the optimum setups and personnel on our PP. if we run a pure umbrella with three out front it depends on having three good onetimer shooters on the perimeter and two guys that can screen crash for rebounds. johansen likes to look pass first on one wing, and subban tends to hold onto the puck too long out top. these delays allow defenders to get out and block the one timers we do get.

when we try to run a regular overload set up, we have a righty johansen who has to run off the left halfboard. which means you want a good left handed shooter in the high slot. we don't really have that scoring lefty that we need. and in turn running the PP off the left halfboard means we have forsberg forced to play down low below the goalline, taking our best scorer out of one timer and high danger shooting ares. we don't have a good enough lefty pp quarterback to run a PP off the right half board where we could get forsberg in the high slot. it's sorta a personnel problem that forces us into an umbrella type attack, which in turn means we are very limited to perimeter type shots.. add in that our zone entries are well scouted and defended and it makes for a perfect storm of suck currently.
 

Gh24

Registered User
Feb 12, 2014
1,774
702
One thing I'm glad is that we're no longer just banging our heads against the wall trying to force those d to d passes and one-timers as the only option.
 

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,078
12,537
our handedness somewhat limits the optimum setups and personnel on our PP. if we run a pure umbrella with three out front it depends on having three good onetimer shooters on the perimeter and two guys that can screen crash for rebounds. johansen likes to look pass first on one wing, and subban tends to hold onto the puck too long out top. these delays allow defenders to get out and block the one timers we do get.

when we try to run a regular overload set up, we have a righty johansen who has to run off the left halfboard. which means you want a good left handed shooter in the high slot. we don't really have that scoring lefty that we need. and in turn running the PP off the left halfboard means we have forsberg forced to play down low below the goalline, taking our best scorer out of one timer and high danger shooting ares. we don't have a good enough lefty pp quarterback to run a PP off the right half board where we could get forsberg in the high slot. it's sorta a personnel problem that forces us into an umbrella type attack, which in turn means we are very limited to perimeter type shots.. add in that our zone entries are well scouted and defended and it makes for a perfect storm of suck currently.
The drop-back zone entry is a little dubious. Ultimately they should have enough SHEER TALENT to do at least something on the PP. I don't know, put Josi and PK together on the PP points, and really I don't think umbrella necessarily works here. Who knows really, they SHOULD have enough talent to make it work in almost any configuration, you'd think. I'm sure the coaching staff is pulling out hairs trying to figure it out, and I'm sure the players are at least scratching their heads. But something has to give at some point. ... doesn't it.... :(

Still, if that's our only headache and it seems soluble with some experimentation, all good, just... of course we are within our rights to try to delve into it...
 

FossilFndr

RIP Steve
Jan 18, 2014
3,206
1,408
Fall Branch, Tn.
Would it help to have a smaller gap between the D man and the following forward as they execute the drop back pass? Or do it 1/2 zone more into the attack giving the defenders less time to react? Or doing less of a drop back, almost just stopping the puck letting the forward skate into it instead of sending it 20 feet back?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad