Confirmed Trade: [NYR/VAN] JT Miller, Erik Brannstrom, Jackson Dorrington for Filip Chytil, Victor Mancini, 2025 1st round pick (top 13 protected)

We have been without our best player. And when he has played he is obviously playing injured.

Doesn't take away that we look a lot better since he left. Hoglander looks like a completely different player. Pettersson as of late is also looking a crap ton better.

Petey last 5 games 7 points
Miller last 5 games 3 points

Last 14 games:

Crybaby: 9 points
Miller: 14 points

Cherry picking stats is nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JKG33 and luiginb
While in NY, Vigneault called him out as immature and it's well known he got into a spat with Henrik freakin' Lundqvist. […]

This is who he is. NY traded for him because a new GM almost a decade later has a weird hard-on for JT.
Doesn’t seem that weird to me; Miller is an excellent golfer and Drury is a bad GM. Complimentary skillsets.
 
Okay cool. NHL site tracks last 5 games. Both are trending in different directions as of late. Not sure what your beef is with Canucks and Pettersson. Are you Millers mom ?
If that actually is, I say sit this one out. Any mother in the world would protect her son like this. I have no problem with that
 
Last 14 games:

Crybaby: 9 points
Miller: 14 points

Cherry picking stats is nice.
How much longer can JT Miller control his behaviour towards his teammates as the Rangers fall further and further from the playoffs? This is a guy, when having to deal with losing, rears his ugly side and lashes out at guys. Yes, he puts up points, but is he worth the trouble? There is a point where he is just too much of a disturbance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaWa and Kreator
How much longer can JT Miller control his behaviour towards his teammates as the Rangers fall further and further from the playoffs? This is a guy, when having to deal with losing, rears his ugly side and lashes out at guys. Yes, he puts up points, but is he worth the trouble? There is a point where he is just too much of a disturbance.

Im sorry NYR fans.

We've had so little for 50 years.

We need to fabricate gotcha's now.

We have nothing else really.

I posted before how Vancouver actually got like 7 quarters for their shiny JT dollar if you factor in cap dumps and whatnot but some of us are obviously taking it harder than others.

I dont apoligize for Soucy but I will for these fans above.

To all the fatass types (thats actually his name) I hope you never experience the level of dysfunction that is the Canucks orginization, in your personal lives if the Jt Miller experience wasnt "worth the trouble".

I give it a 8 outta 10 and this canuck fan would Jt Miller experience again.
 
Im sorry NYR fans.

We've had so little for 50 years.

We need to fabricate gotcha's now.

We have nothing else really.

I posted before how Vancouver actually got like 7 quarters for their shiny JT dollar if you factor in cap dumps and whatnot but some of us are obviously taking it harder than others.

I dont apoligize for Soucy but I will for these fans above.

To all the fatass types (thats actually his name) I hope you never experience the level of dysfunction that is the Canucks orginization, in your personal lives if the Jt Miller experience wasnt "worth the trouble".

I give it a 8 outta 10 and this canuck fan would Jt Miller experience again.
JT Miller is a 220 pound skilled wrecking ball on the ice. Unfortunately he’s a 220 wrecking ball to his teammates in the room too. You mention private lives. I have never heard anything bad about JT Miller in that sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca
JT Miller playing good, or bad with New york has nothing to do with us at this point. We had to trade him no matter what. It was the best move for Vancouver to move on, despite leaving a hole in our line up for the time being.
 
Lol clueless people still think it was EP40 vs JT Miller and it had to be one or the other.
I think most people understood the situation to be:

either EP or JTM or both will be traded, but under no circumstances will both stay.
The fact that the Canucks are still evaluating things with EP40 before his no movement kicks in on July1 should be enough common sense for people to understand that it wasnt JT Miller vs EP40.
that only tells you that the Canucks are willing to trade EP… it does nothing to refute the notion that management came to the conclusion that Miller and EP could no longer coexist on the same team.
 
JT vs EP, Rangers vs Canucks tomorrow at 1pm EST who ya got?? The winner will determine once and for all who won this trade
 
It's dumb to make this a Miller vs. Pettersson trade; they weren't traded for each other.
Canucks sold high on a contract that was about to look really bad, and the Rangers are full of bad salary and aging forwards.
The main knock on Miller was always "what are the Canucks going to do in a couple of years when that contract begins to stink" and they have solved that problem after extracting his most competitive years.
Pettersson on the other hand is younger and has turned the corner, likely still has many big seasons ahead of him.
What I'm currently choked about on behalf of the Canucks is Chytil's injury, and likewise injury history re: concussions - the Canucks are down one of the main assets they need right now to be competitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19
It's dumb to make this a Miller vs. Pettersson trade; they weren't traded for each other.
Canucks sold high on a contract

I agree with your first sentence

I disagree with your second sentence…how did the canucks sell high when they gave up the best player and traded him for a bottom 6 injury prone forward, a decent prospect and a mid 1st round pick at best?

The canucks lost the miller trade but trading him was still the right move. No point keeping someone that doesn’t want to play for your team anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shark Finn
I agree with your first sentence

I disagree with your second sentence…how did the canucks sell high when they gave up the best player and traded him for a bottom 6 injury prone forward, a decent prospect and a mid 1st round pick at best?

The canucks lost the miller trade but trading him was still the right move. No point keeping someone that doesn’t want to play for your team anymore.
The Canucks were over a barrel since JT limited their options given his desire to go to NY.

Long term this will still look good since I suspect his contract will age like milk left outside on a warm summer day.

Perhaps they could have insisted for a different young NHL forward like Will Cuylle. He’s not a center and who knows if he was available but he’s a good young middle 6 guy on a cheap deal.
 
I agree with your first sentence

I disagree with your second sentence…how did the canucks sell high when they gave up the best player and traded him for a bottom 6 injury prone forward, a decent prospect and a mid 1st round pick at best?

The canucks lost the miller trade but trading him was still the right move. No point keeping someone that doesn’t want to play for your team anymore.
Rangers trading a first and a good prospect for a 32 year old is a loss in itself. No clue what drury is thinking. They'll have to rebuild soon. In a couple of years when miller is 34 I highly doubt you'll think vancouver lost this deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca
I agree with your first sentence

I disagree with your second sentence…how did the canucks sell high when they gave up the best player and traded him for a bottom 6 injury prone forward, a decent prospect and a mid 1st round pick at best?

The canucks lost the miller trade but trading him was still the right move. No point keeping someone that doesn’t want to play for your team anymore.
That's a really good return for a 32yo player with a long contract to have gotten no retention.
It was a good trade - lots of teams pay to dump players in those scenarios (or don't get the return they expect).
I think it was an impressive trade and will be regarded as such in retrospect - it was almost the opposite of what happened with OEL.
 
I agree with your first sentence

I disagree with your second sentence…how did the canucks sell high when they gave up the best player and traded him for a bottom 6 injury prone forward, a decent prospect and a mid 1st round pick at best?

The canucks lost the miller trade but trading him was still the right move. No point keeping someone that doesn’t want to play for your team anymore.


Canucks traded a power forward who is 32 yrs old and about to exit his prime making 8 mil a year for 5 more years.

Opening up 8 mil in cap space alone and getting rid of that contract alone is a win for the Canucks who even with Miller is nowhere near ready to contend for the Cup.

Then getting M.Pettersson, Chytil and Mancini along with the trade is icing on the cake. We will take our bumps now but this was absolutely a win trade from Canucks pov. Especially since, JT Miller likely only wanted to go to NYR and NYR only.

We've been in the honeymoon phase with Miller before, enjoy it while it lasts.....He is a great player to have when things are going well for the team and himself......He is an absolute cancer when things are going bad and his antics will grow old fast on alot of players. This has been the book on him since his USA development days as a teenager.
 
I wonder if the rangers have the option to forfeit this years pick in favour of next season then they can retool for the next couple of years and be back to contenders, especially with shesterkin in net.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad