JohnHodgson
Registered User
- May 6, 2009
- 4,153
- 1,542
So not the three firsts you were talking about?
What are you talking about dude?
A top prospect is worth 2 first round picks if they are a blue-chip prospect.
lol
So not the three firsts you were talking about?
You should look up some historical deadline deals and re-evaluate what you said.
You remember what Blake Coleman, and Anthony Mantha got?
Miller is absolutely getting a package worth 3 1sts.
Adding Chycrun and Miller doesn't make your team significantly better?
What are you smoking and where can I get some?
You are delusional if you think there is a significant improvement. Like I said they are good players but not at the price being knocked around... Most of these deals being knocked around on this board are ridiculous. The initial proposal was basically two firsts and a second for JT, come on. If the situation were reveresed you would give up two firsts and a second for Jt. I thought not. Be realistic not a homer.
No he's not! He's not eichel!
Especially ones that favor the Rangers.Dear Devil's fan OP, Stop making trade proposals for the Rangers. Thanks.
yesAs a Ranger fan I give both proposals a hard no. The Rangers are just coming out of a major rebuild albeit ahead of schedule. Why trade the assets you accumulated for a short term fix, that does not significantly improve the team.
JT Miller we have been down that road already. He always came across as miserable during his time in NY. Miller and Horvat are good hockey players but not at the asking price. They are also both on contracts that expire after next year. For this year and next they are both in the 5+ million dollar contract zone.
I know Arizona is having a rough year, but Chych is a minus 31. I know some dont put a lot of weight on that stat these days , but when the +/- is that high, I do. I'm not gonna deal future picks and young prospects for someone that would be a second or third pairing Dman. He is also making 4.6 mil the next for three more years after this season. Thanks but no thanks.
x 2You are delusional if you think there is a significant improvement. Like I said they are good players but not at the price being knocked around... Most of these deals being knocked around on this board are ridiculous. The initial proposal was basically two firsts and a second for JT, come on. If the situation were reveresed you would give up two firsts and a second for Jt. I thought not. Be realistic not a homer.
It would be hard to not consider a Chychrun-Trouba as a 1st pairingChycrun would be a second or possibly third pair dman .. he is not supplanting Lindgren or their pet project K. Miller. Your going to give up three firsts and other assets for a second or third pair Dman?
With a +/- of -31!
Miller like I said is a solid player but not at the asking price or salary.. Not to mention you have to negotiate another deal after next year. The Rangers have a bunch of players coming off entry contracts. Kakko, Laf, KAM, also Strome, Hunt, Blais , and Georgiev . They currently have approx 6 mil in cap space. Do you trade for him and let him walk after giving up basically two firsts and a second. Does his miserable personality fit in the locker room also.
No. Not really. I’m by no means a Vancouver fan. But Lundkvist isn’t a top prospect. That’s why I assumed the 2nd was added.That’s, uh, exactly what is in offer lmao
solid second pair but not a first over Fox and LindgrenIt would be hard to not consider a Chychrun-Trouba as a 1st pairing
solid second pair but not a first over Fox and Lindgren
Haha you guys need to collectively go vote on where you are as a team lol.
Simultaneously we have posters saying they are first round exits at best, while others are saying the team is so good Chychrun would not be a top pairing defensman