They seem pretty ineffective mostly because our roster lacks true power forwards, who can drive the net and open up space for them. As mediocre as Abby is, if we had two more of him, we could create 3 decent lines that work consistently. Our lineup generally lacks size and grit on the top lines to go with the playmaking. If I were Nyquist and Tatar, I would stop frustrating myself trying to create too much and start shooting from just about everywhere. Work the percentages, hope for rebounds, deflections, flukes, etc. Anything is better than skating around till you turn the puck over. I still like the fact they're at least trying, though.
Agree. We should go after Komarov if possible.
But don't think Toronto will want any of our players, because Babcock knows them too well. So it would be only for picks.
Gus most definitely stepped up recently, making himself more noticeable.
Getting the feeling that some only look out for actual assists or goals, not created chances.
Tatar mentioned something along the lines of him scoring less because of the system Detroit plays this year. I think he said it was like a tight checking thing. This was maybe like a month ago for a Slovak newspaper, can't remember which one now, so I can't find the link and the exact quote. Any thoughts on that guys?
These two are really one dimensional type NHLers. The stat lines for both are nearly identical, no joke.
Tomas Tatar 2015-2016 DET L 60 16 17 33 -3 24 5 10 0 0 3 1 126 12.7 14:36 20.0 23.8
Gustav Nyquist 2015-2016 DET R 61 14 18 32 -4 20 6 10 0 0 3 2 123 11.4 15:10 20.0 0.0
Both need to shoot A LOT more! Neither hit much nor drive the net often.
We basically have two new versions of Hudler & Filppula.
Thanks Ken Holland. I think Nyquist is the slower skater so if I was Kenny I would trade him first but ultimately both will probably be gone in a few seasons anyway.
Tatar mentioned something along the lines of him scoring less because of the system Detroit plays this year. I think he said it was like a tight checking thing. This was maybe like a month ago for a Slovak newspaper, can't remember which one now, so I can't find the link and the exact quote. Any thoughts on that guys?
Tatar mentioned something along the lines of him scoring less because of the system Detroit plays this year. I think he said it was like a tight checking thing. This was maybe like a month ago for a Slovak newspaper, can't remember which one now, so I can't find the link and the exact quote. Any thoughts on that guys?
Basically the entire team has lower offensive numbers than last year so he's not wrong in 'blaming' the system. However he would have 20 more points this year if he didn't think he was Patrick Kane and started passing the puck more and shooting when he's got chances instead of stickhandling.Tatar mentioned something along the lines of him scoring less because of the system Detroit plays this year. I think he said it was like a tight checking thing. This was maybe like a month ago for a Slovak newspaper, can't remember which one now, so I can't find the link and the exact quote. Any thoughts on that guys?
Basically the entire team has lower offensive numbers than last year so he's not wrong in 'blaming' the system. However he would have 20 more points this year if he didn't think he was Patrick Kane and started passing the puck more and shooting when he's got chances instead of stickhandling.
Small, soft euro... Not highly skilled enough to make up for softness and small size, not big and strong enough for his current skill-setWhat the hell happened to Nyquist?
Predicted to be a great scorer with a really high value, a couple of years ago.
Now....dud?
What the hell happened to Nyquist?
Predicted to be a great scorer with a really high value, a couple of years ago.
Now....dud?
During his explosion it was when he was relatively unknown. Now other teams plan for him and he gets beaten like a redheaded step child of a rented mule by defenders.
You talk as if it's been years and years since he was good. He is a good scorer, 50-60 point type of player. Thing is, when you have a team that doesn't score a lot of goals it hurts everyone's numbers. Gus still just needs a good finish to the season to get to 50+ points, he's hardly a dud.What the hell happened to Nyquist?
Predicted to be a great scorer with a really high value, a couple of years ago.
Now....dud?
Wasn't his SH% his first couple seasons sky high? And a lot of it was on the PP if I recall correctly. Regression towards the mean + our terribad PP this season = big decline in numbers.