Speculation: Nylander XI - All rumors, proposals, discussion, etc. HERE

Status
Not open for further replies.

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,321
5,978
NYC
He's worth a second round pick at best being unsigned and that price is dropping daily

Okay... That’s slightly harsh. A second and Pesce for Nyl and a 3rd or 4th at least rn. Yes as days go by it drops by not down to something as low as a second lol
 

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,835
9,733
No team is trading for an unsigned Nylander, they will have a contract worked out prior, or at the very least a good basis to start discussions.
Exactly, and Toronto is not going to trade him unsigned for A low return. Toronto will want to maximize the return, meaning a contract will have to be negotiated with the new team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

Brobust

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
7,184
6,566
I wonder why Drouin for Sergachev is never brought up as a comparable trade on here.

Drouin was actually under contract and walked away. He's a lesser player than Nylander. And the Lightning for a stud 20 year old for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marty111

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,835
9,733
Okay... That’s slightly harsh. A second and Pesce for Nyl and a 3rd or 4th at least rn. Yes as days go by it drops by not down to something as low as a second lol
lol, Toronto is not the one adding here. Nylander has absolutely no leverage, Toronto owns his rights until he is 27. He is restricted, he is going nowhere. So these lowball garbage trade offers are not going to cut it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mork

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,230
24,504
Evanston, IL
This is an exact replica of the Kessel scenario, coming off a ELC, the star winger who could be a center wants money traded in the fall.

Eventually he was traded for two 1sts and a 2nd.
He was traded for what was expected to be two late first rounders and a late second rounder.

As it turned out, the trade has been universally panned as one of the worst trades in recent memory.

What gives you the idea that any GM would be willing to risk a similar trade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,607
7,139
I wonder why Drouin for Sergachev is never brought up as a comparable trade on here.

Drouin was actually under contract and walked away. He's a lesser player than Nylander. And the Lightning for a stud 20 year old for him.

Drouin underachieved his first couple of years while Nylander has two 60 points seasons so I probably would put Nylander's value slightly higher
 

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,321
5,978
NYC
lol, Toronto is not the one adding here. Nylander has absolutely no leverage, Toronto owns his rights until he is 27. He is restricted, he is going nowhere. So these lowball garbage trade offers are not going to cut it.

You seriously think Canes would add much? Lol. Tor is in no position to expect them to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,835
9,733
You seriously think Canes would add much? Lol. Tor is in no position to expect them to.
Ok, but the other teams in the NHL can not expect Toronto to do them any favors. I mean, Nylander is a young elite player that every team would like on their roster.


The Leafs are in full control. If Willy wants be Stubborn, no prob...sit out until you are 27.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Spring Samauri

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,321
5,978
NYC
Ok, but the other teams in the NHL can not expect Toronto to do them any favors. I mean, Nylander is a young elite player that every team would like on their roster.


The Leafs are in full control. If Willy wants be Stubborn, no prob...sit out until you are 27.

Of course not, and obviously they wouldn’t. No team will overpay for someone holding out though. If a trade comes I think it will be very very even.

I feel as if every day Leafs gain leverage on signing Nyl but at the same time if they wait until a week before Dec to trade him I don’t think at that point that they will be the ones in full control. Why over pay for Toronto’s problem? If they don’t want to take what you have to offer then fine like you said let him sit out but at the same time loose an asset that can help you with a cup run.
 

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,814
17,958
He was traded for what was expected to be two late first rounders and a late second rounder.

As it turned out, the trade has been universally panned as one of the worst trades in recent memory.

What gives you the idea that any GM would be willing to risk a similar trade?
Lottery protect the picks
 

613Leafer

Registered User
May 26, 2008
13,021
3,960
He was traded for what was expected to be two late first rounders and a late second rounder.

As it turned out, the trade has been universally panned as one of the worst trades in recent memory.

What gives you the idea that any GM would be willing to risk a similar trade?

Why would you expect late 1sts on a team that had Stajan as a #1C, Toskala as a #1G, no #1D, and weak depth?

Leafs were projected bottom feeders by most at the time, and rightly so. Kessel at the time was only a ~60 point forward, not exactly a guy to carry a bottom feeder.
 

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,835
9,733
Of course not, and obviously they wouldn’t. No team will overpay for someone holding out though. If a trade comes I think it will be very very even.

I feel as if every day Leafs gain leverage on signing Nyl but at the same time if they wait until a week before Dec to trade him I don’t think at that point that they will be the ones in full control. Why over pay for Toronto’s problem? If they don’t want to take what you have to offer then fine like you said let him sit out but at the same time loose an asset that can help you with a cup run.
It is not a problem for Toronto. It costs the Leafs zero against the Cap. Willy can sit until he is 27 if he whats.

Nylander is a luxury, not a problem. Toronto has a ton of depth moving forward. They have no issues winning without him.
 

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,321
5,978
NYC
It is not a problem for Toronto. It costs the Leafs zero against the Cap. Willy can sit until he is 27 if he whats.

Nylander is a luxury, not a problem. Toronto has a ton of depth moving forward. They have no issues winning without him.

I’d say having someone of his caliper sitting when he could be playing is a problem. Yes they have no issues winning cuz Tor is a damn good team, but they could be even better with him or with a trade. It would feel shitty to loose in 7 in the 3rd round knowing you could have had an extra player who makes impact
 

Arthur Morgan

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
8,912
6,232
Toronto
www.youtube.com
how is he not signed yet. so frustrating. it's obvious he wants alot more than he's worth. this has gone on long enough.
I'm losing hope Nylander will ever play for the blue and white again
 

Syckle78

Registered User
Nov 5, 2011
14,585
7,826
Redford, MI
I wonder why Drouin for Sergachev is never brought up as a comparable trade on here.

Drouin was actually under contract and walked away. He's a lesser player than Nylander. And the Lightning for a stud 20 year old for him.
Sergachev had yet to prove anything in the NHL. You want to trade nylander for a recent number 8ish draft pick that hasn't done anything? Didn't think so.
 

AvatarAang

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
2,492
5,006
It is not a problem for Toronto. It costs the Leafs zero against the Cap. Willy can sit until he is 27 if he whats.

Nylander is a luxury, not a problem. Toronto has a ton of depth moving forward. They have no issues winning without him.

Pretty sure your boys in blue are getting wrecked lately.
 

TorontoTrades

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
6,459
2,194
If I could have Ehlers at 6.75 or Nylander at 6.75 I'd choose Ehlers. So I guess that says something to me about his value.... Then again, if I was asked if I could have Bobby Ryan at his current cap hit or Nylanders at Ryans cap hit id take Nylander.....


I think Leafs basically are saying Ehlers and Pastrnak are on those deals so how are you worth more? They are limited with Matthews and Marner being more important contracts coming up. I think Nylander has to decide if a little money is worth a chance to win. If say they could settle on 6.5 on 7 years is it worth getting traded to make 7 somewhere that could be not a playoff team (not knowing the trading partner). 45.5 million vs. 49 million and being a part of the core of a bright future. Leafs aren't the only team that would say no to a blank check.

However, A bridge deal should have been completed a while ago. I cant see them actually losing the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoName

BM14

Registered User
Dec 7, 2012
6,124
4,226
GTA
I’d say having someone of his caliper sitting when he could be playing is a problem. Yes they have no issues winning cuz Tor is a damn good team, but they could be even better with him or with a trade. It would feel ****ty to loose in 7 in the 3rd round knowing you could have had an extra player who makes impact
lol watch him in the playoffs. He's not a playoff performer.

Toronto doesn't need him.
 

37Bergenov14

Registered User
Jul 14, 2016
238
109
It is not a problem for Toronto. It costs the Leafs zero against the Cap. Willy can sit until he is 27 if he whats.

Nylander is a luxury, not a problem. Toronto has a ton of depth moving forward. They have no issues winning without him.

but him sitting out til he's 27 without being traded would also be terrible asset management by the leafs. Sure, he doesn't lose a ton of trade value over the short term, but as that time clicks past a few months/a year his value would take a major beating. so it's not really accurate to imply it's no sweat of the leafs' back letting him indefinitely sit out. it would be brutal to burn an asset of his value into the ground with little/nothing to show for it.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,971
25,670
Vancouver, BC
It is not a problem for Toronto. It costs the Leafs zero against the Cap. Willy can sit until he is 27 if he whats.

Nylander is a luxury, not a problem. Toronto has a ton of depth moving forward. They have no issues winning without him.
Wow! You’ve sure changed your tune.
Yesterday you claimed the Leafs were worse than an AHL team with Matthews and Nylander our. Consistency is certainly not your trademark. :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad